Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.
Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Beniamino Brunetti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti
{"title":"Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Controlled Randomized Study.","authors":"Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Beniamino Brunetti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence v: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04655-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Renuvion was the first FDA approved helium plasma device utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of Renuvion improves the outcomes, skin quality and reduces the edema faster after lipoabdominoplasty.
Materials and methods: Patients with abdominal skin laxity after a weight loss of at least 20 kg, nonsmokers, without major comorbidities, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were included in this study. They were randomly divided in two groups: group 1, lipoabdominoplasty alone; group 2, lipoabdominoplasty and Renuvion. Both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. Postoperatively, all patients were administered the BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen and appraisal of excess skin scales. Two independent plastic surgeons reviewed photographs, rating the outcomes on a 1-5 visual analog scale (VAS). Pinch test and ultrasound of the subcutaneous tissue were also performed.
Results: Seventy-six patients were enrolled, 33 males and 43 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. The BODY-Q satisfaction with abdomen scores were higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p = 0.007), 1-year (p = 0.021) and 2-year (p = 0.024) evaluations. The BODY-Q appraisal of excess skin scores were significantly higher in group 2 in the 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.0001) and 2-year (p < 0.0001) postoperative evaluations. The VAS scale reported higher scores in group 2 (p = 0.01). Ultrasound at 6 months postoperatively demonstrated lower subcutaneous thickness in group 2 (31 mm ± 2.8 SD) compared to group 1 (42 mm ± 1.4 SD) implying a faster edema reabsorption.
Conclusions: Data showed a significantly greater improvement of abdominal skin laxity in patients treated with Renuvion compared to those who underwent lipoabdominoplasty alone. This is the first prospective randomized study about Renuvion and lipoabdominoplasty and could be considered a pilot study.
Level of evidence v: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.