Is There Scientific Evidence on the Practice of Rib Resection or Remodeling for Body Contouring Purposes?-A Systematic Review.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04685-3
Lydia Masako Ferreira, Graziela Schmitz Bonin, Afranio Benedito Silva Bernardes, Gabriel Felsky Dos Anjos, José Yoshikazu Tariki, Celso Boechat, Marcelo Sacramento Cunha, Ognev Meireles Cosac, Pedro Eduardo Nader Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa Aloe, Yuji Ikuta, Wanda Elizabeth Messiere Correa, Gabriel de Almeida Arruda Felix, Felipe Contoli Isoldi
{"title":"Is There Scientific Evidence on the Practice of Rib Resection or Remodeling for Body Contouring Purposes?-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lydia Masako Ferreira, Graziela Schmitz Bonin, Afranio Benedito Silva Bernardes, Gabriel Felsky Dos Anjos, José Yoshikazu Tariki, Celso Boechat, Marcelo Sacramento Cunha, Ognev Meireles Cosac, Pedro Eduardo Nader Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa Aloe, Yuji Ikuta, Wanda Elizabeth Messiere Correa, Gabriel de Almeida Arruda Felix, Felipe Contoli Isoldi","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04685-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rib resection and remodeling have gained attention as cosmetic procedures to enhance body contours, particularly waist-to-hip ratio. Historically, rib resection has been used for medical reasons; however, plastic surgeons have recently adopted it for aesthetic purposes. However, concerns remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of the procedure, particularly due to the potential for complications, such as pneumothorax, chronic pain, and impaired respiratory function. This systematic review aimed to assess the existing evidence on rib resection or remodeling for body contouring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and others were searched for studies involving rib resection or remodeling for aesthetic purposes. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, including adult patients and outcomes related to waist circumference reduction, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 12 studies that revealed variability in techniques, patient selection, and outcomes. Rib resection was associated with significant risks such as pneumothorax and chronic pain; however, newer rib remodeling techniques, such as green-stick fractures and rib shaving, showed fewer complications. Despite promising results in some cases, the lack of long-term studies and randomized clinical trials limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of these procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rib remodeling appears to offer a less invasive alternative to full-rib resection, with a reduced risk of complications. However, the current literature is insufficient to provide conclusive evidence regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of these procedures. Further high-quality studies, including randomized trials, are needed to inform surgical practices and patient decision-making regarding rib-based body contouring.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04685-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rib resection and remodeling have gained attention as cosmetic procedures to enhance body contours, particularly waist-to-hip ratio. Historically, rib resection has been used for medical reasons; however, plastic surgeons have recently adopted it for aesthetic purposes. However, concerns remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of the procedure, particularly due to the potential for complications, such as pneumothorax, chronic pain, and impaired respiratory function. This systematic review aimed to assess the existing evidence on rib resection or remodeling for body contouring.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and others were searched for studies involving rib resection or remodeling for aesthetic purposes. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, including adult patients and outcomes related to waist circumference reduction, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

Results: This review included 12 studies that revealed variability in techniques, patient selection, and outcomes. Rib resection was associated with significant risks such as pneumothorax and chronic pain; however, newer rib remodeling techniques, such as green-stick fractures and rib shaving, showed fewer complications. Despite promising results in some cases, the lack of long-term studies and randomized clinical trials limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of these procedures.

Conclusion: Rib remodeling appears to offer a less invasive alternative to full-rib resection, with a reduced risk of complications. However, the current literature is insufficient to provide conclusive evidence regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of these procedures. Further high-quality studies, including randomized trials, are needed to inform surgical practices and patient decision-making regarding rib-based body contouring.

Level of evidence i: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否有科学证据表明肋骨切除或重塑用于身体轮廓的目的?-系统评价。
引言:肋骨切除和重塑已成为人们关注的美容手术,以提高身体轮廓,特别是腰臀比。从历史上看,肋骨切除术一直用于医学原因;然而,最近整形外科医生为了美观而采用了它。然而,该手术的安全性和有效性仍然值得关注,特别是由于潜在的并发症,如气胸、慢性疼痛和呼吸功能受损。本系统综述旨在评估现有的肋骨切除或重塑身体轮廓的证据。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane等数据库,以寻找以美学为目的的肋骨切除或重塑的研究。研究的选择是基于预定义的纳入标准,包括成人患者和与腰围减小、不良事件和患者满意度相关的结果。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。结果:本综述包括12项研究,揭示了技术、患者选择和结果的可变性。肋骨切除与气胸和慢性疼痛等显著风险相关;然而,较新的肋骨重塑技术,如绿棒骨折和肋骨剃须,并发症较少。尽管在某些情况下有很好的结果,但缺乏长期研究和随机临床试验限制了对这些手术的有效性和安全性得出明确结论的能力。结论:肋骨重塑似乎提供了一种侵入性较小的替代全肋骨切除,降低了并发症的风险。然而,目前的文献不足以提供关于这些手术的长期安全性和有效性的确凿证据。需要进一步的高质量研究,包括随机试验,为手术实践和患者对基于肋骨的身体轮廓的决策提供信息。证据等级i:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Global Landscape of Knowledge Mapping and Research Trends in Hyaluronic Acid for Wound Healing: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1952-2023). Mending a World of Problems: 12-Year Review of Medical Tourism Inbound Complications in a Tertiary Centre. Prognosis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Flap Necrosis: Predictors of Failure and Salvage. The Top 100 Cited Articles in Male Aesthetic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis. Upper Blepharoplasty for Dermatochalasis With or Without Resection of the Orbicularis Oculi Muscle, Preaponeurotic and Nasal Fat Pads: A Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1