The effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on patients underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery; a systematic review.

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/EWMH1925
Fatemeh Chichagi, Reyhaneh Alikhani, Mohammad Hossein Hosseini, Kiarash Azadi, Niyousha Shirsalimi, Saeed Ghodsi, Mana Jameie
{"title":"The effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on patients underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery; a systematic review.","authors":"Fatemeh Chichagi, Reyhaneh Alikhani, Mohammad Hossein Hosseini, Kiarash Azadi, Niyousha Shirsalimi, Saeed Ghodsi, Mana Jameie","doi":"10.62347/EWMH1925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To our knowledge, there is no clear consensus on a definitive cardiac rehabilitation method for patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). We conducted this systematic review to compare and evaluate the effects of two of the most frequent cardiac rehabilitation modalities, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), on cardiopulmonary variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic search of the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Following the removal of duplicate results, the original search yielded 385 citations. We identified four randomized clinical trials after reviewing titles, abstracts, and potential full-text studies. We utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2) to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included four randomized clinical trials involving 143 people. All trials included individuals who had CABG and completed HIIT or MICT sessions for at least four weeks. The findings indicated that HIIT programs may improve functional capacity, heart rate variability indices, and blood pressure management while lowering brain natriuretic peptide (BNP<sub>1-32</sub>) and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP<sub>1-76</sub>) levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the findings, it appeared that supervised high-intensity exercise regimens could be more useful to patients. Following the surgery, HIIT therapy improves exercise capacity, the autonomic nervous system, volume overload, and blood pressure regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":"14 6","pages":"306-317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/EWMH1925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To our knowledge, there is no clear consensus on a definitive cardiac rehabilitation method for patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). We conducted this systematic review to compare and evaluate the effects of two of the most frequent cardiac rehabilitation modalities, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), on cardiopulmonary variables.

Methods: We carried out a systematic search of the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Following the removal of duplicate results, the original search yielded 385 citations. We identified four randomized clinical trials after reviewing titles, abstracts, and potential full-text studies. We utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2) to assess the risk of bias.

Results: We included four randomized clinical trials involving 143 people. All trials included individuals who had CABG and completed HIIT or MICT sessions for at least four weeks. The findings indicated that HIIT programs may improve functional capacity, heart rate variability indices, and blood pressure management while lowering brain natriuretic peptide (BNP1-32) and N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP1-76) levels.

Conclusion: Given the findings, it appeared that supervised high-intensity exercise regimens could be more useful to patients. Following the surgery, HIIT therapy improves exercise capacity, the autonomic nervous system, volume overload, and blood pressure regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度间歇训练和中强度持续训练对冠状动脉搭桥术患者的影响系统回顾。
目的:据我们所知,对于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的心脏康复方法尚无明确的共识。我们进行了这一系统综述,以比较和评估两种最常见的心脏康复方式,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和中等强度连续训练(MICT)对心肺变量的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、谷歌Scholar等数据库。在删除重复结果之后,原始搜索产生了385次引用。在回顾了题目、摘要和潜在的全文研究后,我们确定了四项随机临床试验。我们使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB2)来评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了四项随机临床试验,涉及143人。所有的试验都包括CABG和完成HIIT或MICT至少四周的个体。研究结果表明,HIIT方案可以改善功能能力、心率变异性指标和血压管理,同时降低脑钠肽(BNP1-32)和n端前b型钠肽(NT-proBNP1-76)水平。结论:鉴于这些发现,似乎有监督的高强度运动方案对患者更有用。手术后,HIIT治疗可改善运动能力、自主神经系统、容量过载和血压调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Burden and predictors of mortality related to cardiogenic shock in the South Bronx Population. Comparison of long-term outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis treated with different immunosuppressive drugs. Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists. Physical cardiac rehabilitation effects on cardio-metabolic outcomes in the patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. Prevalence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in patients with aortic stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1