Impact of frailty and older age on weaning from invasive ventilation: a secondary analysis of the WEAN SAFE study.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s13613-025-01435-1
Caoimhe M Laffey, Rionach Sheerin, Omid Khazaei, Bairbre A McNicholas, Tài Pham, Leo Heunks, Giacomo Bellani, Laurent Brochard, Dana Tomescu, Andrew J Simpkin, John G Laffey
{"title":"Impact of frailty and older age on weaning from invasive ventilation: a secondary analysis of the WEAN SAFE study.","authors":"Caoimhe M Laffey, Rionach Sheerin, Omid Khazaei, Bairbre A McNicholas, Tài Pham, Leo Heunks, Giacomo Bellani, Laurent Brochard, Dana Tomescu, Andrew J Simpkin, John G Laffey","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01435-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the impact of both frailty and chronologic age on outcomes of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of patients enrolled in the 'WorldwidE. AssessmeNt of Separation of pAtients From ventilatory assistancE (WEAN SAFE) study. We defined 4 non-overlapping groups, namely: 'frail' (clinical frailty scale [CFS] score > 4; age < 80 years); 'elderly' (CFS ≤ 4; age ≥ 80y), 'frail \\elderly' (CFS > 4; age ≥ 80 years), and a 'not frail or elderly' population. The primary outcome was the impact of frailty and older age on delayed weaning and failed weaning from invasive MV. Secondary outcomes included the impact of frailty and age on ICU and hospital survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study population, 760 (17%) were frail, while 360 (8%) were elderly, 197 (4%) were frail and elderly, while 3,176 (70%) were not frail or elderly. The frail and elderly cohorts were more likely to be female, had hypoxemic/hypercapnic respiratory failure or sepsis, and had more comorbidities. The proportion of delayed weaning and of failed weaning from invasive MV was significantly higher in the frail (28 and 23%), the elderly (25 and 19%), and the frail and elderly groups (22% and 25%), compared to the not frail or elderly population (12% and 13%, P < 0.01). ICU and hospital mortality was higher in the frail (21 and 33%), the elderly (19 and 31%), and the frail and elderly groups (26 and 46%), compared to the not frail or elderly population (12% and 18%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, there was an independent association between frailty and delayed weaning initiation and weaning failure. Old age was independently associated with risk of weaning failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty status had a more consistent impact than older age on weaning outcomes. However, overall outcomes in these cohorts are encouraging once separation attempts have been initiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01435-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand the impact of both frailty and chronologic age on outcomes of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods: The study population consisted of patients enrolled in the 'WorldwidE. AssessmeNt of Separation of pAtients From ventilatory assistancE (WEAN SAFE) study. We defined 4 non-overlapping groups, namely: 'frail' (clinical frailty scale [CFS] score > 4; age < 80 years); 'elderly' (CFS ≤ 4; age ≥ 80y), 'frail \elderly' (CFS > 4; age ≥ 80 years), and a 'not frail or elderly' population. The primary outcome was the impact of frailty and older age on delayed weaning and failed weaning from invasive MV. Secondary outcomes included the impact of frailty and age on ICU and hospital survival.

Results: In the study population, 760 (17%) were frail, while 360 (8%) were elderly, 197 (4%) were frail and elderly, while 3,176 (70%) were not frail or elderly. The frail and elderly cohorts were more likely to be female, had hypoxemic/hypercapnic respiratory failure or sepsis, and had more comorbidities. The proportion of delayed weaning and of failed weaning from invasive MV was significantly higher in the frail (28 and 23%), the elderly (25 and 19%), and the frail and elderly groups (22% and 25%), compared to the not frail or elderly population (12% and 13%, P < 0.01). ICU and hospital mortality was higher in the frail (21 and 33%), the elderly (19 and 31%), and the frail and elderly groups (26 and 46%), compared to the not frail or elderly population (12% and 18%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, there was an independent association between frailty and delayed weaning initiation and weaning failure. Old age was independently associated with risk of weaning failure.

Conclusions: Frailty status had a more consistent impact than older age on weaning outcomes. However, overall outcomes in these cohorts are encouraging once separation attempts have been initiated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱和老年对有创通气脱机的影响:对断奶安全研究的二次分析。
目的:了解体弱多病和年龄对有创机械通气(MV)脱机结果的影响。方法:研究人群包括在世界范围内登记的患者。患者脱离呼吸辅助(断奶安全)研究的评估。我们定义了4个不重叠的组,即:“虚弱”组(临床虚弱量表[CFS]评分bbbb4;4岁;年龄≥80岁),“非体弱或老年”人群。主要结局是体弱多病和老年对侵袭性MV延迟断奶和失败断奶的影响。次要结局包括虚弱和年龄对ICU和住院生存的影响。结果:研究人群中体弱多病760例(17%),老年360例(8%),体弱多病高龄197例(4%),非体弱多病高龄3176例(70%)。体弱多病和老年人更可能是女性,有低氧血症/高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭或败血症,并有更多的合并症。与非体弱多病或老年人群(12%和13%)相比,体弱多病组(28%和23%)、老年人(25%和19%)以及体弱多病和老年人群(22%和25%)因侵袭性MV而延迟断奶和断奶失败的比例显著高于体弱多病或老年人群(12%和13%)。结论:体弱多病状态对断奶结果的影响比年龄更大。然而,一旦开始尝试分离,这些队列的总体结果是令人鼓舞的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical power is not associated with mortality in COVID-19 mechanically ventilated patients. AI for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications. Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: diagnosis and management. [18F]FDG PET/CT identifies infectious and inflammatory foci in persistent critical illness. Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in the management of sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1