Cognitive Functioning in Females with Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Literature Review.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acaf003
Ashlee Berryman, Liana Machado
{"title":"Cognitive Functioning in Females with Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Literature Review.","authors":"Ashlee Berryman, Liana Machado","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive complaints are commonplace among women living with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP); yet, surprisingly few studies have assessed their cognitive functioning. As an initial step to address the resulting knowledge gap, this review aimed to synthesize the current literature reporting on cognition in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, and due to the poverty of endometriosis studies, to draw on data from female cohorts with other chronic pain conditions to gain potentially relevant insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three database searches were conducted (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 8 regarding endometriosis, n = 10 regarding other chronic pain conditions).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six of the seven studies employing objective cognitive measures in females with other chronic pain reported significant cognitive deficits. Associated changes in neural circuitry thought to underpin these deficits align with neural patterns reported in females with endometriosis-associated CPP. While two studies reported a high prevalence (≥60%) of self-reported cognitive impairment in endometriosis-associated CPP, objective performance deficits have not been reported. Nonetheless, self-reported accounts of cognitive impairment suggest females with endometriosis-associated CPP may experience difficulties with inhibition, attention, and memory. Most studies did not control for potential moderating factors and comorbidities that prevail among endometriosis populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The field is in desperate need of research assessing cognitive performance in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, to objectively determine any cognitive difficulties. Attention should be paid to likely moderators, pain-related mechanisms, and whether findings extend to endometriosis without CPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive complaints are commonplace among women living with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP); yet, surprisingly few studies have assessed their cognitive functioning. As an initial step to address the resulting knowledge gap, this review aimed to synthesize the current literature reporting on cognition in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, and due to the poverty of endometriosis studies, to draw on data from female cohorts with other chronic pain conditions to gain potentially relevant insights.

Methods: Three database searches were conducted (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 8 regarding endometriosis, n = 10 regarding other chronic pain conditions).

Results: Six of the seven studies employing objective cognitive measures in females with other chronic pain reported significant cognitive deficits. Associated changes in neural circuitry thought to underpin these deficits align with neural patterns reported in females with endometriosis-associated CPP. While two studies reported a high prevalence (≥60%) of self-reported cognitive impairment in endometriosis-associated CPP, objective performance deficits have not been reported. Nonetheless, self-reported accounts of cognitive impairment suggest females with endometriosis-associated CPP may experience difficulties with inhibition, attention, and memory. Most studies did not control for potential moderating factors and comorbidities that prevail among endometriosis populations.

Conclusion: The field is in desperate need of research assessing cognitive performance in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, to objectively determine any cognitive difficulties. Attention should be paid to likely moderators, pain-related mechanisms, and whether findings extend to endometriosis without CPP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性子宫内膜异位症相关慢性盆腔疼痛的认知功能:文献综述
目的:认知主诉在患有子宫内膜异位症相关慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)的女性中很常见;然而,令人惊讶的是,很少有研究评估他们的认知功能。作为解决由此产生的知识差距的第一步,本综述旨在综合目前关于子宫内膜异位症相关CPP女性认知的文献报道,并且由于子宫内膜异位症研究的贫乏,从患有其他慢性疼痛疾病的女性队列中提取数据,以获得潜在的相关见解。方法:检索3个数据库(Scopus、PubMed、PsycINFO)。18项研究符合纳入标准(n = 8关于子宫内膜异位症,n = 10关于其他慢性疼痛状况)。结果:七项研究中有六项采用客观认知测量方法对患有其他慢性疼痛的女性进行了显著的认知缺陷。神经回路的相关变化被认为是这些缺陷的基础,与报道的子宫内膜异位症相关CPP女性的神经模式一致。虽然两项研究报告了子宫内膜异位症相关CPP患者自我报告认知障碍的高患病率(≥60%),但尚未报道客观表现缺陷。尽管如此,自我报告的认知障碍表明,患有子宫内膜异位症相关CPP的女性可能在抑制、注意力和记忆方面遇到困难。大多数研究没有控制子宫内膜异位症人群中普遍存在的潜在调节因素和合并症。结论:该领域迫切需要研究评估子宫内膜异位症相关CPP女性的认知表现,以客观地确定任何认知困难。应注意可能的调节因素,疼痛相关机制,以及研究结果是否适用于无CPP的子宫内膜异位症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Longitudinal Psychiatric Signatures in Huntington's Disease. Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric Normative Project: Robust Age- and Regression-Based Demographic Norms for the Repeatable Battery for Neuropsychological Status and Select Neuropsychological Tests in Older Adults. Switching and its Impact on Perseveration in a Verbal Fluency Task: a Study in Persons With Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome. Comparison of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Geriatric Anxiety Scale in an Older Adult Neurology Clinic Sample. Normative Data for the Modified Location Learning Test (m-LLT) in the French-Quebec Population Aged Between 50 and 89 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1