Application of Different Surgical Strategies in Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastric Ulcers with Perforation: A Comparative Study of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes and Complication Risks.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3812
Jianqiang Pan, Miao Shen, Su Peng
{"title":"Application of Different Surgical Strategies in Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastric Ulcers with Perforation: A Comparative Study of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes and Complication Risks.","authors":"Jianqiang Pan, Miao Shen, Su Peng","doi":"10.62713/aic.3812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the short- and long-term efficacy of simple suture with omental patch repair (Graham patch) in open surgery versus laparoscopic omental patch repair (LOPR) in treating patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated gastric ulcers with perforation, and analyzed the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical information of patients who had stomach perforation repair surgery in Deqing People's Hospital between January 2021 and January 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a control group (n = 54), whose subjects underwent the Graham patch repair, and an observation group (n = 52), whose subjects underwent laparoscopic gastric perforation repair. The general characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative surgical indicators, 1-year postoperative recurrence, and incidence of various postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients' clinical data were included in the study, of which 52 (49.1%) underwent LOPR and 54 (50.9%) were treated with Graham patch. The general characteristics of the patients in both groups were comparable. The observation group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative recovery time compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the observation group had lower rates of postoperative complications and recurrence compared to the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOPR is a potential therapeutic method for patients with H. pylori-associated gastric ulcers with perforations on grounds of its superior efficacy and decreased incidence of comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 1","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study compared the short- and long-term efficacy of simple suture with omental patch repair (Graham patch) in open surgery versus laparoscopic omental patch repair (LOPR) in treating patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated gastric ulcers with perforation, and analyzed the incidence of complications.

Methods: The clinical information of patients who had stomach perforation repair surgery in Deqing People's Hospital between January 2021 and January 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a control group (n = 54), whose subjects underwent the Graham patch repair, and an observation group (n = 52), whose subjects underwent laparoscopic gastric perforation repair. The general characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative surgical indicators, 1-year postoperative recurrence, and incidence of various postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 106 patients' clinical data were included in the study, of which 52 (49.1%) underwent LOPR and 54 (50.9%) were treated with Graham patch. The general characteristics of the patients in both groups were comparable. The observation group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative recovery time compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the observation group had lower rates of postoperative complications and recurrence compared to the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: LOPR is a potential therapeutic method for patients with H. pylori-associated gastric ulcers with perforations on grounds of its superior efficacy and decreased incidence of comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同手术策略在幽门螺杆菌相关胃溃疡伴穿孔中的应用:近期和长期预后及并发症风险的比较研究
目的:本研究比较单纯缝合网膜补片修补术(Graham patch)与腹腔镜网膜补片修补术(LOPR)治疗幽门螺杆菌(h.p ylori)相关胃溃疡伴穿孔患者的短期和长期疗效,并分析并发症的发生率。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年1月在德清市人民医院行胃穿孔修复手术患者的临床资料。将患者分为对照组(n = 54)和观察组(n = 52),对照组采用Graham补片修补术,观察组采用腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术。记录两组患者的一般特征、治疗结果、术中术后手术指标、术后1年复发率及术后各种并发症的发生率,并进行比较。结果:共纳入106例患者的临床资料,其中52例(49.1%)行LOPR治疗,54例(50.9%)行Graham贴片治疗。两组患者的一般特征具有可比性。观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复时间均明显优于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组术后并发症及复发率低于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论:LOPR治疗幽门螺杆菌相关性胃溃疡伴穿孔疗效优越,并发症发生率低,是一种有潜力的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Application of Different Surgical Strategies in Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastric Ulcers with Perforation: A Comparative Study of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes and Complication Risks. Conservative Management of Gastric Twist and Leak Post Band Removal and Sleeve Gastrectomy. Effect of Fast-Track Surgery Based on Nutritional Support in the Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Radical Thyroidectomy and Lateral Lymphadenectomy: A Retrospective Analysis. Effectiveness of Perioperative Finger Sensory Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Fingertip Amputation and Reimplantation: A Retrospective Study. A Novel Ensemble Approach for Rib Fracture Detection and Visualization using CNNs and Grad-CAM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1