Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy: A Safe and Effective Approach for Managing Recurrent Massive Pericardial Effusion.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Angiology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1177/00033197241311949
Ahmet Kıvrak, Samuray Zekeriyayev, Uğur Canpolat, Fedan Hajizade, Çiğdem Deniz, Cem Çöteli, Ahmet Hakan Ateş, Kudret Aytemir
{"title":"Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy: A Safe and Effective Approach for Managing Recurrent Massive Pericardial Effusion.","authors":"Ahmet Kıvrak, Samuray Zekeriyayev, Uğur Canpolat, Fedan Hajizade, Çiğdem Deniz, Cem Çöteli, Ahmet Hakan Ateş, Kudret Aytemir","doi":"10.1177/00033197241311949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PBP) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical interventions for recurrent severe pericardial effusion (PE), particularly in patients with malignancies. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of PBP in patients with recurrent severe PE. A total of 42 patients with recurrent severe PE underwent PBP between March 2008 and July 2024. PBP was performed under conscious sedation with fluoroscopic guidance using a 20-mm by 60-mm balloon. Data were collected on patient demographics, echocardiographic findings, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes. The study population had a mean age of 58.4 ± 11.2 years, with 54.8% being female. Most patients (76.2%) had malignant PEs. The procedure was technically successful in all cases, with no immediate complications. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Post-procedural transthoracic echocardiography showed no residual effusion in 40.5% of patients and minimal effusion in 50%. Over a median follow-up of 353 days, 54.8% of patients died due to the progression of underlying malignancies, and four patients experienced recurrent effusions requiring additional intervention. PBP is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent severe PE, particularly in patients with malignancies. The procedure's high success rate and favorable safety profile suggest it might be considered a first-line treatment option in appropriate clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197241311949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241311949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PBP) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical interventions for recurrent severe pericardial effusion (PE), particularly in patients with malignancies. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of PBP in patients with recurrent severe PE. A total of 42 patients with recurrent severe PE underwent PBP between March 2008 and July 2024. PBP was performed under conscious sedation with fluoroscopic guidance using a 20-mm by 60-mm balloon. Data were collected on patient demographics, echocardiographic findings, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes. The study population had a mean age of 58.4 ± 11.2 years, with 54.8% being female. Most patients (76.2%) had malignant PEs. The procedure was technically successful in all cases, with no immediate complications. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Post-procedural transthoracic echocardiography showed no residual effusion in 40.5% of patients and minimal effusion in 50%. Over a median follow-up of 353 days, 54.8% of patients died due to the progression of underlying malignancies, and four patients experienced recurrent effusions requiring additional intervention. PBP is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent severe PE, particularly in patients with malignancies. The procedure's high success rate and favorable safety profile suggest it might be considered a first-line treatment option in appropriate clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮球囊心包切开术:治疗复发性大量心包积液安全有效的方法。
经皮球囊心包切开术(PBP)已成为复发性严重心包积液(PE)的手术干预的一种侵入性较小的选择,特别是在恶性肿瘤患者中。本研究评估PBP治疗复发性严重PE患者的安全性和有效性。在2008年3月至2024年7月期间,共有42例复发性严重PE患者接受了PBP。PBP在清醒镇静下使用20mm × 60mm球囊在透视引导下进行。收集了患者人口统计学、超声心动图结果、手术细节和随访结果的数据。研究人群平均年龄58.4±11.2岁,女性占54.8%。多数患者(76.2%)为恶性pe。手术在技术上是成功的,没有立即出现并发症。平均住院时间为4天。术后经胸超声心动图显示40.5%的患者无残留积液,50%的患者有少量积液。在中位353天的随访中,54.8%的患者因潜在恶性肿瘤的进展而死亡,4名患者出现复发性积液,需要额外的干预。PBP是一种安全有效的治疗复发性严重PE的方法,特别是对于恶性肿瘤患者。该手术的高成功率和良好的安全性表明,在适当的临床环境中,它可能被视为一线治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte, Lymphocyte/C-reactive protein, Platelet/ Lymphocyte Rates in Covid-19 Cases Monitored in the Intensive Care Unit. Association Between Carotid Plaque Characteristics and Silent New Ipsilateral Ischemic Lesions After Carotid Artery Stenting. Letter: CXCL1 Index May Act as a Potential Biomarker of Plaque Instability in Patients with Carotid Stenosis. Authors' Reply. Letter: Exploring the Link Between GGT/ALT Ratio and Carotid Plaque in Coronary Artery Disease. Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in Children in South Africa: Reference Values for the Vicorder Device.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1