Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy: a stepwise approach and comparative analysis of surgical outcomes: a narrative review of recent literature.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.31616/asj.2024.0465
Min-Woo Kim, Ye-Soo Park, Chang-Nam Kang, Sung Hoon Choi
{"title":"Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy: a stepwise approach and comparative analysis of surgical outcomes: a narrative review of recent literature.","authors":"Min-Woo Kim, Ye-Soo Park, Chang-Nam Kang, Sung Hoon Choi","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selecting the optimal surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy significantly affects symptom improvement, postoperative prognosis, and quality of life. Proper patient selection and precise surgical execution are crucial for achieving successful outcomes, considering the favorable natural course of cervical radiculopathy. Several factors must be considered, including the number of affected segments, spinal alignment, kyphosis degree, stiffness, and surgeon expertise, when determining the surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An anterior approach is commonly used in cases that involve fewer than three segments with mild kyphosis, whereas posterior laminoplasty or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are effective for cases with more than three segments with maintained lordosis. Both the degree of stiffness and spinal cord compression need to be considered for cases with kyphotic deformity. ACDF may be suitable when anterior structures are the primary source of compression and mild kyphosis is present. The decision between laminoplasty or laminectomy and fusion depends on the kyphosis degree for multilevel compression with kyphosis. An evaluation of cervical rigidity is required for severe kyphosis, and posterior laminectomy and fusion may be effective for flexible kyphosis, whereas a staged posterior-anterior-posterior approach may be required for rigid kyphosis to address both deformity and neural compression. This review summarizes recent research and presents illustrative cases of optimal surgical decision-making for various cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting the optimal surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy significantly affects symptom improvement, postoperative prognosis, and quality of life. Proper patient selection and precise surgical execution are crucial for achieving successful outcomes, considering the favorable natural course of cervical radiculopathy. Several factors must be considered, including the number of affected segments, spinal alignment, kyphosis degree, stiffness, and surgeon expertise, when determining the surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An anterior approach is commonly used in cases that involve fewer than three segments with mild kyphosis, whereas posterior laminoplasty or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are effective for cases with more than three segments with maintained lordosis. Both the degree of stiffness and spinal cord compression need to be considered for cases with kyphotic deformity. ACDF may be suitable when anterior structures are the primary source of compression and mild kyphosis is present. The decision between laminoplasty or laminectomy and fusion depends on the kyphosis degree for multilevel compression with kyphosis. An evaluation of cervical rigidity is required for severe kyphosis, and posterior laminectomy and fusion may be effective for flexible kyphosis, whereas a staged posterior-anterior-posterior approach may be required for rigid kyphosis to address both deformity and neural compression. This review summarizes recent research and presents illustrative cases of optimal surgical decision-making for various cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy presentations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓型颈椎病和神经根病:手术结果的逐步方法和比较分析:近期文献的叙述性回顾。
多节段型脊髓型颈椎病和神经根病选择最佳手术治疗方式对症状改善、术后预后和生活质量有显著影响。考虑到颈椎神经根病的良好自然病程,正确的患者选择和精确的手术执行对于获得成功的结果至关重要。在确定脊髓型颈椎病的手术入路时,必须考虑几个因素,包括受影响节段的数量、脊柱对齐、后凸程度、僵硬度和外科医生的专业知识。前路入路通常用于少于3节段轻度后凸的病例,而后路椎板成形术或前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)对超过3节段且前凸维持的病例有效。对于后凸畸形的病例,僵硬程度和脊髓压迫都需要考虑。当前路结构是压迫的主要来源且存在轻度后凸时,ACDF可能是合适的。椎板成形术或椎板切除术和融合的决定取决于多节段压迫后凸的程度。对于严重的后凸需要对颈椎僵硬度进行评估,对于柔性后凸,后路椎板切除术和融合可能有效,而对于刚性后凸,可能需要分阶段的后-前-后入路来解决畸形和神经压迫问题。这篇综述总结了最近的研究,并提出了各种神经根型颈椎病和脊髓病的最佳手术决策的说明性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computed tomography Hounsfield unit values as a treatment response indicator for spinal metastatic lesions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in Japan. Effect of core stabilization exercises on cervical sagittal balance parameters in patients with forward head posture: a randomized controlled trial in Egypt. Atlantodentoplasty using the anterior retropharyngeal approach for treating irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with atlantodental bony obstruction: a retrospective study. Endoscopic surgery for multilevel spinal stenosis: a comprehensive meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of uniportal and biportal approaches. Performance and clinical implications of machine learning models for detecting cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1