Quality indicators of supportive care for patients with cancer undergoing treatment: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13519-z
Ayako Okuyama, Mai Kuwabara, Sadamoto Zenda
{"title":"Quality indicators of supportive care for patients with cancer undergoing treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"Ayako Okuyama, Mai Kuwabara, Sadamoto Zenda","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13519-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients need to be supported in combining treatment with daily life. However, measurement of supportive care indicators related to treatment-related side effects is under-reported. This review aimed to identify a list of quality indicators for managing cancer treatment-induced toxicities for adult patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was conducted on PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase from September 26, 2013 to December 26, 2023. Published English articles that developed or analyzed quality indicators of managing cancer treatment-induced toxicities for adult patients with cancer were selected. The identified indicators were classified according to Donabedian's model for quality of care in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two indicators (4 structural, 27 process, and 11 outcome indicators) in 18 articles were identified. Eight articles (44.4%) were from North America, four (22.2%) from Europe, two (11.1%) from Oceania, two (11.1%) from Asia, and one (5.6%) from Africa; 64.3% of the indicators were process indicators based on guidelines. The prevalence of patient symptoms determined using a patient-reported outcome measure was proposed as an outcome indicator. In seven studies (38.9%), these indicators were selected by multidisciplinary experts. None of the studies involved patients or family members in the indicator selection process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of supportive care should be improved by measuring these indicators, considering the patient's needs for supportive care at each hospital such that patients can continue their lives while undergoing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13519-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients need to be supported in combining treatment with daily life. However, measurement of supportive care indicators related to treatment-related side effects is under-reported. This review aimed to identify a list of quality indicators for managing cancer treatment-induced toxicities for adult patients with cancer.

Methods: A review was conducted on PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase from September 26, 2013 to December 26, 2023. Published English articles that developed or analyzed quality indicators of managing cancer treatment-induced toxicities for adult patients with cancer were selected. The identified indicators were classified according to Donabedian's model for quality of care in healthcare.

Results: Forty-two indicators (4 structural, 27 process, and 11 outcome indicators) in 18 articles were identified. Eight articles (44.4%) were from North America, four (22.2%) from Europe, two (11.1%) from Oceania, two (11.1%) from Asia, and one (5.6%) from Africa; 64.3% of the indicators were process indicators based on guidelines. The prevalence of patient symptoms determined using a patient-reported outcome measure was proposed as an outcome indicator. In seven studies (38.9%), these indicators were selected by multidisciplinary experts. None of the studies involved patients or family members in the indicator selection process.

Conclusion: The quality of supportive care should be improved by measuring these indicators, considering the patient's needs for supportive care at each hospital such that patients can continue their lives while undergoing treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正在接受治疗的癌症患者的支持性护理质量指标:一项系统综述。
背景:需要支持患者将治疗与日常生活相结合。然而,与治疗相关副作用相关的支持性护理指标的测量报告不足。本综述旨在确定成人癌症患者治疗引起的毒性管理的质量指标清单。方法:对2013年9月26日至2023年12月26日的PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Embase进行回顾性分析。研究人员选择了已发表的针对成年癌症患者制定或分析癌症治疗毒性管理质量指标的英文文章。根据Donabedian的医疗保健质量模型对确定的指标进行分类。结果:在18篇文章中确定了42个指标(4个结构指标,27个过程指标,11个结果指标)。北美洲8篇(44.4%),欧洲4篇(22.2%),大洋洲2篇(11.1%),亚洲2篇(11.1%),非洲1篇(5.6%);64.3%的指标是基于指南的过程指标。采用患者报告的结果测量方法确定患者症状的流行程度,建议将其作为结果指标。在7项研究中(38.9%),这些指标由多学科专家选择。在指标选择过程中,没有一项研究涉及患者或家庭成员。结论:通过测量这些指标,考虑患者在各医院对支持性护理的需求,提高支持性护理的质量,使患者在接受治疗的同时能够继续生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Integrating BRCA testing into routine prostate cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach by SIUrO and other Italian Scientific Societies. Multimodal treatments and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: insights from a nationally representative cohort in South Korea. Multiple time points for detecting circulating tumor DNA to monitor the response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Patient satisfaction with radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localization compared with wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: the RFID trial. Personalized optimization of systematic prostate biopsy core number based on mpMRI radiomics features: a large-sample retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1