A realist evaluation to explain and understand the role of paramedics in primary care.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03863-z
Georgette Eaton, Geoff Wong, Stephanie Tierney, Veronika Williams, Kamal R Mahtani
{"title":"A realist evaluation to explain and understand the role of paramedics in primary care.","authors":"Georgette Eaton, Geoff Wong, Stephanie Tierney, Veronika Williams, Kamal R Mahtani","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03863-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to the unsustainable workload and workforce crises in primary care, paramedics (with their generalist clinical background acquired from ambulance service experience) are increasingly employed in primary care. However, the specific contribution paramedics can offer to the primary care workforce has not been distinctly outlined. We used realist approaches to understand the ways in which paramedics impact (or not) the primary care workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A realist evaluation was undertaken, consisting of three independent but inter-related research studies: In WP1, a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey of paramedics in primary care in the UK was conducted to comprehend the existing practices of paramedics within the NHS. WP2 involved an analytic auto-netnography, where online conversations among paramedics in primary care were observed to understand paramedics' perceptions of their role. WP3 utilised focused observations and interviews to delve into the impact of paramedics on the primary care workforce. This comparative study collected data from sixty participants across fifteen sites in the UK, and twelve participants across three sites in a specific region in Canada, where Community Paramedicine is well established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The culmination of findings from each phase led to the development of a final programme theory, comprising of 50 context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) encompassing three conceptual categories: Expectations associated with paramedics in primary care, the transition of paramedics into primary care roles, and the roles and responsibilities of paramedics in primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our realist evaluation used a mixed-method approach to present empirical evidence of the role of paramedics in primary care. It offers insights into factors relating to their deployment, employment, and how they fit within the wider primary care team. Based on the evidence generated, we produced a series of practice implementation recommendations and highlighted areas for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03863-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In response to the unsustainable workload and workforce crises in primary care, paramedics (with their generalist clinical background acquired from ambulance service experience) are increasingly employed in primary care. However, the specific contribution paramedics can offer to the primary care workforce has not been distinctly outlined. We used realist approaches to understand the ways in which paramedics impact (or not) the primary care workforce.

Methods: A realist evaluation was undertaken, consisting of three independent but inter-related research studies: In WP1, a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey of paramedics in primary care in the UK was conducted to comprehend the existing practices of paramedics within the NHS. WP2 involved an analytic auto-netnography, where online conversations among paramedics in primary care were observed to understand paramedics' perceptions of their role. WP3 utilised focused observations and interviews to delve into the impact of paramedics on the primary care workforce. This comparative study collected data from sixty participants across fifteen sites in the UK, and twelve participants across three sites in a specific region in Canada, where Community Paramedicine is well established.

Results: The culmination of findings from each phase led to the development of a final programme theory, comprising of 50 context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) encompassing three conceptual categories: Expectations associated with paramedics in primary care, the transition of paramedics into primary care roles, and the roles and responsibilities of paramedics in primary care.

Conclusions: Our realist evaluation used a mixed-method approach to present empirical evidence of the role of paramedics in primary care. It offers insights into factors relating to their deployment, employment, and how they fit within the wider primary care team. Based on the evidence generated, we produced a series of practice implementation recommendations and highlighted areas for further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个现实的评估来解释和理解护理人员在初级保健中的作用。
背景:为了应对初级保健中不可持续的工作量和劳动力危机,护理人员(具有从救护车服务经验获得的通才临床背景)越来越多地在初级保健中使用。然而,护理人员对初级保健工作人员的具体贡献尚未明确概述。我们使用现实主义的方法来理解护理人员影响(或不影响)初级保健工作人员的方式。方法:进行现实主义评估,包括三个独立但相互关联的研究:在WP1中,对英国初级保健护理人员进行了混合方法横断面调查,以了解NHS内护理人员的现有做法。WP2涉及分析自动网络图,观察初级保健护理人员之间的在线对话,以了解护理人员对其角色的看法。WP3利用重点观察和访谈来深入研究护理人员对初级保健工作人员的影响。这项比较研究收集了来自英国15个地点的60名参与者的数据,以及来自加拿大一个特定地区3个地点的12名参与者的数据,在加拿大,社区辅助医疗已经建立得很好。结果:每个阶段的研究结果的高潮导致了最终方案理论的发展,包括50个情境-机制-结果配置(cmoc),其中包括三个概念类别:初级保健护理人员的期望,护理人员向初级保健角色的转变,以及初级保健护理人员的角色和责任。结论:我们的现实主义评估使用混合方法的方法来提出护理人员在初级保健中的作用的经验证据。它提供了与他们的部署、就业以及他们如何适应更广泛的初级保健团队有关的因素的见解。根据所产生的证据,我们提出了一系列实践实施建议,并强调了进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Antidepressant use and cognitive decline in patients with dementia: a national cohort study. Relationship of tobacco smoking to cause-specific mortality: contemporary estimates from Australia. Development and validation of the systemic nutrition/inflammation index for improving perioperative management of non-small cell lung cancer. Guidelines for the use of lung ultrasound to optimise the management of neonatal respiratory distress: international expert consensus. Long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors: findings from the OPT-CAD cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1