Derivation and validation of a simple prognostic risk score to predict short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: SABIHA Score.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.314
Kenan Toprak, Mustafa Kaplangöray, Mesut Karataş, Zuhal Fatma Cellat, Yakup Arğa, Rüstem Yılmaz, Mustafa Begenc Tascanov, Asuman Biçer
{"title":"Derivation and validation of a simple prognostic risk score to predict short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: SABIHA Score.","authors":"Kenan Toprak, Mustafa Kaplangöray, Mesut Karataş, Zuhal Fatma Cellat, Yakup Arğa, Rüstem Yılmaz, Mustafa Begenc Tascanov, Asuman Biçer","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the context of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), a frequently encountered medical emergency associated with high early mortality rates, there is a need to predict short-term outcomes for risk stratification.Our aim was to derive and validate a model, a simple clinical scoring system using baseline vital signs, clinical and presenting characteristics, and readily available laboratory tests, that allows accurate prediction of short-term mortality in individuals experiencing ACPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 1088 patients with ACPE from six health centers. Subjects were randomly allocated into derivation and validation cohorts at a 4:3 ratio, facilitating comprehensive examination and validation of prognostic model. Independent predictors of mortality (p<0.05) from the multivariable model were included in the risk score. The discriminant ability of the score was tested by ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the derivation cohort (n=623), age, blood urea nitrogen, heart rate, intubation, anemia, and systolic blood pressure were identified as independent predictors of mortality in multivariable analysis. These variables were used to develop a risk score ranging from 0 to 6 by scoring 0 and 1. The SABIHA score provided a good calibration with a concordance index of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.821-0.937). While the probability of short-term mortality was 80.0% in the high risk group, this rate was only 3.3% in the low risk group. This score also performed well on the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A simple clinical score consisting of routinely obtained variables can be used in risk stratification to predict short-term outcomes in patients with ACPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the context of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), a frequently encountered medical emergency associated with high early mortality rates, there is a need to predict short-term outcomes for risk stratification.Our aim was to derive and validate a model, a simple clinical scoring system using baseline vital signs, clinical and presenting characteristics, and readily available laboratory tests, that allows accurate prediction of short-term mortality in individuals experiencing ACPE.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1088 patients with ACPE from six health centers. Subjects were randomly allocated into derivation and validation cohorts at a 4:3 ratio, facilitating comprehensive examination and validation of prognostic model. Independent predictors of mortality (p<0.05) from the multivariable model were included in the risk score. The discriminant ability of the score was tested by ROC analysis.

Results: In the derivation cohort (n=623), age, blood urea nitrogen, heart rate, intubation, anemia, and systolic blood pressure were identified as independent predictors of mortality in multivariable analysis. These variables were used to develop a risk score ranging from 0 to 6 by scoring 0 and 1. The SABIHA score provided a good calibration with a concordance index of 0.879 (95% CI: 0.821-0.937). While the probability of short-term mortality was 80.0% in the high risk group, this rate was only 3.3% in the low risk group. This score also performed well on the validation set.

Conclusions: A simple clinical score consisting of routinely obtained variables can be used in risk stratification to predict short-term outcomes in patients with ACPE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推导和验证预测急性心源性肺水肿短期死亡率的简单预后风险评分:SABIHA评分。
目的:急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE)是一种经常遇到的与高早期死亡率相关的医疗紧急情况,在这种情况下,有必要预测短期结果以进行风险分层。我们的目的是推导和验证一个模型,一个简单的临床评分系统,使用基线生命体征,临床和表现特征,以及容易获得的实验室测试,可以准确预测ACPE患者的短期死亡率。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括来自6个卫生中心的1088例ACPE患者。受试者按4:3的比例随机分为推导组和验证组,便于对预后模型进行全面检查和验证。在衍生队列(n=623)中,年龄、血尿素氮、心率、插管、贫血和收缩压在多变量分析中被确定为死亡率的独立预测因素。这些变量被用来建立一个从0到6的风险评分,得分为0和1。SABIHA评分提供了良好的校准,一致性指数为0.879 (95% CI: 0.821-0.937)。高风险组的短期死亡率为80.0%,而低风险组的短期死亡率仅为3.3%。该分数在验证集上也表现良好。结论:由常规获得的变量组成的简单临床评分可用于风险分层,以预测ACPE患者的短期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Academic articles with public health perspectives as a potential tool for Korean doctors in addressing health issues. Common carotid arterial pseudoaneurysm mistaken for peritonsillar abscess. Derivation and validation of a simple prognostic risk score to predict short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: SABIHA Score. Impact of Concomitant Injuries on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Isolated versus Non-Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury. Performance of transesophageal echocardiography probe at temperature monitoring during simulated hypothermia and rewarming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1