The Predictive Value of Preadolescent Suicidal Ideation Reporter Discrepancies in the ABCD Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Child Psychiatry & Human Development Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01806-y
Alyssa J Parker, Peyton Brock, Mina Hughes, Olivia P Cutshaw, Grace Messina, Jillian Lee Wiggins, Lea R Dougherty
{"title":"The Predictive Value of Preadolescent Suicidal Ideation Reporter Discrepancies in the ABCD Study.","authors":"Alyssa J Parker, Peyton Brock, Mina Hughes, Olivia P Cutshaw, Grace Messina, Jillian Lee Wiggins, Lea R Dougherty","doi":"10.1007/s10578-024-01806-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little data exist to guide suicide assessment protocols in preadolescent youth. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) data (N = 10,010) at baseline (ages 9-10) and 24-month follow-up (ages 11-12), this report investigates informant agreement/disagreement in caregiver- and youth- reports of suicidal ideation and their associations with youth sex assigned at birth and symptomatology across preadolescence. Using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) at both timepoints, four informant discrepancy groups were created from caregiver- and youth- reported suicidal ideation: (1) Concordant No; (2) Concordant Yes; (3) Discordant Caregiver Yes, Youth No; (4) Discordant Caregiver No, Youth Yes. Internalizing and externalizing symptoms were measured at the 24-month follow-up using the caregiver-report Child Behavior Checklist and the youth-report ABCD Brief Problem Monitor. Results indicated low-to-fair caregiver-youth agreement for youth suicidal ideation across preadolescence. Suicidal ideation reported by youth, but not caregivers, demonstrated a shift in prevalence at the follow-up, with females surpassing males in self-reported endorsements. Finally, informant groups at both time points were associated with caregiver- and youth-reported youth symptomatology at the 24-month follow-up, and associations varied by reporter. Findings demonstrate the importance of leveraging both caregiver and youth reports to assess preadolescent suicidal ideation and highlight the clinical utility of informant discrepancies in assessing suicide risk. The accurate assessment of suicidal ideation in preadolescents is essential to curb the increasing rates of preadolescent suicide and identify at-risk youth for interventions prior to even larger uptick of suicide in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01806-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little data exist to guide suicide assessment protocols in preadolescent youth. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) data (N = 10,010) at baseline (ages 9-10) and 24-month follow-up (ages 11-12), this report investigates informant agreement/disagreement in caregiver- and youth- reports of suicidal ideation and their associations with youth sex assigned at birth and symptomatology across preadolescence. Using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) at both timepoints, four informant discrepancy groups were created from caregiver- and youth- reported suicidal ideation: (1) Concordant No; (2) Concordant Yes; (3) Discordant Caregiver Yes, Youth No; (4) Discordant Caregiver No, Youth Yes. Internalizing and externalizing symptoms were measured at the 24-month follow-up using the caregiver-report Child Behavior Checklist and the youth-report ABCD Brief Problem Monitor. Results indicated low-to-fair caregiver-youth agreement for youth suicidal ideation across preadolescence. Suicidal ideation reported by youth, but not caregivers, demonstrated a shift in prevalence at the follow-up, with females surpassing males in self-reported endorsements. Finally, informant groups at both time points were associated with caregiver- and youth-reported youth symptomatology at the 24-month follow-up, and associations varied by reporter. Findings demonstrate the importance of leveraging both caregiver and youth reports to assess preadolescent suicidal ideation and highlight the clinical utility of informant discrepancies in assessing suicide risk. The accurate assessment of suicidal ideation in preadolescents is essential to curb the increasing rates of preadolescent suicide and identify at-risk youth for interventions prior to even larger uptick of suicide in adolescence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABCD研究中青少年前自杀意念的预测价值
指导青春期前青少年自杀评估方案的数据很少。利用基线(9-10岁)和24个月随访(11-12岁)的青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)数据(N = 10,010),本报告调查了照顾者和青少年对自杀意念报告的同意/不同意及其与青少年出生时性别分配和青春期前症状的关系。在两个时间点使用儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表(K-SADS),从照顾者和青少年报告的自杀意念中创建了四个信息差异组:(1)一致性No;(2)“是”;(3)不和谐的照顾者是,青年否;(4)不和谐的照顾者不是,年轻是。在24个月的随访中,使用照顾者报告儿童行为检查表和青少年报告ABCD简要问题监测表测量内化和外化症状。结果表明,青少年自杀意念的照顾者与青少年之间的一致性低至公平。在随访中,青少年(而非护理人员)报告的自杀意念显示了患病率的变化,女性在自我报告的支持方面超过了男性。最后,在24个月的随访中,两个时间点的信息者组与护理者和青少年报告的青少年症状有关,并且随报告者而异。研究结果证明了利用照顾者和青少年报告来评估青春期前自杀意念的重要性,并强调了评估自杀风险时信息差异的临床效用。准确评估青春期前的自杀意念对于遏制青春期前自杀率的上升以及在青春期自杀率大幅上升之前识别有风险的青少年进行干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Predictive Value of Preadolescent Suicidal Ideation Reporter Discrepancies in the ABCD Study. Expert Rater Agreement for Symptoms and Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in Youth. Heterogeneity in Developmental Trajectories of Internalizing and Externalizing Symptomatology: Associations with Risk and Protective Factors. Impact of Positive Childhood Experiences (PCEs): A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Training Community Clinicians in Implementing CBT-ERP for Youth with OCD: A Pilot Study in Australian Community Mental Health Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1