Comparative Effectiveness of Calcium-Channel Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Diuretics on Cardiovascular Events Likelihood in Hypertensive African-American and Non-Hispanic Caucasians: A Retrospective Study Across HCA Healthcare

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1002/clc.70075
Anil Harrison, Sushil Rayamajhi, Farhad Shaker, Schwartz Thais, Melissa Moreno, Kaveh Hosseini
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Calcium-Channel Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Diuretics on Cardiovascular Events Likelihood in Hypertensive African-American and Non-Hispanic Caucasians: A Retrospective Study Across HCA Healthcare","authors":"Anil Harrison,&nbsp;Sushil Rayamajhi,&nbsp;Farhad Shaker,&nbsp;Schwartz Thais,&nbsp;Melissa Moreno,&nbsp;Kaveh Hosseini","doi":"10.1002/clc.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hypertension, a leading global risk factor for mortality and disability, disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities. Our study investigates the association between the type of prior antihypertensive medication use and the likelihood of cardiovascular events (CVE) and assesses whether the patient's race influences this relationship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study of 14 836 hypertension cases aged ≥ 40 years was conducted using data from HCA Healthcare between 2017 and 2023. Logistic regression was employed to predict the likelihood of CVE and mortality at admission, adjusting for baseline comorbidities, with Race added as an effect modifier. Interaction analysis was performed among races based on antihypertensive medication types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>African American patients on ACE inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were 1.7 times more likely to have cardiovascular events (CVE) compared to those on calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and 0.66 times as likely compared to diuretics. CCB users had a lower CVE risk than diuretic users. Among White patients, ACE/ARB users had a 1.18 times higher CVE risk than CCB users and 0.45 times lower compared to diuretics, while CCBs offered a 0.38 times lower risk than diuretics. Only ACE/ARB use showed significantly higher CVE odds for African Americans compared to White patients, with similar risks across racial groups for CCBs and diuretics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Prior antihypertensive type significantly influenced CVE risk, with race as an effect modifier. CCB users had lower CVE odds than ACE/ARBs or diuretics, and ACE/ARBs showed reduced CVE likelihood compared to diuretics in both racial groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hypertension, a leading global risk factor for mortality and disability, disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities. Our study investigates the association between the type of prior antihypertensive medication use and the likelihood of cardiovascular events (CVE) and assesses whether the patient's race influences this relationship.

Methods

A retrospective study of 14 836 hypertension cases aged ≥ 40 years was conducted using data from HCA Healthcare between 2017 and 2023. Logistic regression was employed to predict the likelihood of CVE and mortality at admission, adjusting for baseline comorbidities, with Race added as an effect modifier. Interaction analysis was performed among races based on antihypertensive medication types.

Results

African American patients on ACE inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were 1.7 times more likely to have cardiovascular events (CVE) compared to those on calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and 0.66 times as likely compared to diuretics. CCB users had a lower CVE risk than diuretic users. Among White patients, ACE/ARB users had a 1.18 times higher CVE risk than CCB users and 0.45 times lower compared to diuretics, while CCBs offered a 0.38 times lower risk than diuretics. Only ACE/ARB use showed significantly higher CVE odds for African Americans compared to White patients, with similar risks across racial groups for CCBs and diuretics.

Conclusion

Prior antihypertensive type significantly influenced CVE risk, with race as an effect modifier. CCB users had lower CVE odds than ACE/ARBs or diuretics, and ACE/ARBs showed reduced CVE likelihood compared to diuretics in both racial groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钙通道阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和利尿剂对高血压非裔美国人和非西班牙裔白种人心血管事件可能性的比较效果:一项来自HCA医疗保健的回顾性研究
背景:高血压是导致死亡和残疾的主要全球危险因素,对少数种族和族裔的影响尤为严重。我们的研究调查了既往抗高血压药物使用类型与心血管事件(CVE)可能性之间的关系,并评估患者的种族是否影响这种关系。方法:采用HCA Healthcare 2017 - 2023年的数据,对14836例年龄≥40岁的高血压患者进行回顾性研究。采用Logistic回归预测入院时CVE的可能性和死亡率,调整基线合并症,并添加种族作为效果调节因子。根据抗高血压药物类型进行种族间相互作用分析。结果:服用ACE抑制剂(ACE)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)的非裔美国患者发生心血管事件(CVE)的可能性是服用钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)的1.7倍,是服用利尿剂的0.66倍。CCB使用者的CVE风险低于利尿剂使用者。在白人患者中,ACE/ARB使用者的CVE风险比CCB使用者高1.18倍,比利尿剂低0.45倍,而CCB的风险比利尿剂低0.38倍。与白人患者相比,非裔美国人使用ACE/ARB的CVE几率明显更高,不同种族的CCBs和利尿剂的风险相似。结论:既往抗高血压类型显著影响CVE风险,种族是影响因素。CCB使用者的CVE发生率低于ACE/ arb或利尿剂,ACE/ arb与利尿剂相比,在两个种族组中均显示CVE可能性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
期刊最新文献
National Trends in Mortality Due to Ischemic Stroke Among Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation in the USA, 1999–2020 Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Staged Revascularization of Nonculprit Arteries in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Urgent Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair Is Associated With Worse in-Hospital Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis Investigating Left Atrial Diameter and Heart Failure Onset in Middle-Aged and Elderly: A Retrospective-Prospective Study Blood Metabolome Mediates the Effect of the Plasma Lipidome on the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1