Impact of Time to Catheter-Based Therapy on Outcomes in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014499
Robert S Zhang, Eugene Yuriditsky, Peter Zhang, Bedros Taslakian, Lindsay Elbaum, Allison A Greco, Vikramjit Mukherjee, Radu Postelnicu, Nancy E Amoroso, Thomas S Maldonado, James M Horowitz, Sripal Bangalore
{"title":"Impact of Time to Catheter-Based Therapy on Outcomes in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"Robert S Zhang, Eugene Yuriditsky, Peter Zhang, Bedros Taslakian, Lindsay Elbaum, Allison A Greco, Vikramjit Mukherjee, Radu Postelnicu, Nancy E Amoroso, Thomas S Maldonado, James M Horowitz, Sripal Bangalore","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 patients were included (mean age, 58.3 years; 44% women; 29% catheter-directed thrombolysis; 68% mechanical thrombectomy; and 3% both). The median time to intervention was 6.1 hours in the early group and 20.8 hours in the delayed group (<i>P</i><0.001). A total of 16 patients (12% of patients) experienced the primary composite outcome. Early CBT was associated with a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome (4% versus 18%; log-rank <i>P</i><0.001; inverse probability of treatment weighting [hazard ratio, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03-0.58); <i>P</i>=0.007]) and secondary composite outcome (0% versus 9%; log-rank <i>P</i>=0.02). The early CBT group also had lower intensive care unit (3.0 versus 3.4 days; <i>P</i>=0.01) and hospital length of stay (5.0 versus 6.1 days; <i>P</i>=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"18 1","pages":"e014499"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates.

Results: A total of 133 patients were included (mean age, 58.3 years; 44% women; 29% catheter-directed thrombolysis; 68% mechanical thrombectomy; and 3% both). The median time to intervention was 6.1 hours in the early group and 20.8 hours in the delayed group (P<0.001). A total of 16 patients (12% of patients) experienced the primary composite outcome. Early CBT was associated with a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome (4% versus 18%; log-rank P<0.001; inverse probability of treatment weighting [hazard ratio, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03-0.58); P=0.007]) and secondary composite outcome (0% versus 9%; log-rank P=0.02). The early CBT group also had lower intensive care unit (3.0 versus 3.4 days; P=0.01) and hospital length of stay (5.0 versus 6.1 days; P=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention.

Conclusions: Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管治疗时间对急性肺栓塞预后的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是研究早期与延迟导管治疗(CBTs)对急性中危肺栓塞(PE)患者临床结局的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月至2024年1月来自2个学术中心的中危PE患者的数据。结果:共纳入133例患者(平均年龄58.3岁;44%的女性;29%导管溶栓;68%机械取栓;两者都是3%)。早期组到干预的中位时间为6.1小时,延迟组为20.8小时(PPP=0.007),次要综合结局(0%对9%;log-rank P = 0.02)。早期CBT组重症监护时间也较短(3.0天vs 3.4天;P=0.01)和住院时间(5.0 vs 6.1天;P = 0.046)。当患者按CBT时间(早期/晚期)和PE综合休克评分(高≥3分;结论:早期CBT可改善急性中危性PE患者的临床预后。复合PE休克评分可以帮助确定早期CBT患者的获益情况。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Guiding Catheter Disengagement on Resting Indexes for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses. Ultra-Low Contrast IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease: An Observational Prospective Study. Three-Dimensional CT for Preprocedural Planning of PCI for Ostial Right Coronary Artery Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Residual Mitral Regurgitation Interacts With Transmitral Mean Pressure Gradient to Modify the Association With Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Intravascular Imaging as a Performance Measure for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1