The effect of brief, repetitive balance training on balance and fall risk in older people with stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1177/02692155241312067
Almudena Medina-Rincón, Laura M Pérez, Caritat Bagur-Calafat, Ana M Barrios-Franquesa, Marta Amor-Barbosa, Víctor Doménech-García, Pablo Bellosta-López, Almudena Buesa-Estéllez, Montserrat Girabent-Farrés
{"title":"The effect of brief, repetitive balance training on balance and fall risk in older people with stroke: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Almudena Medina-Rincón, Laura M Pérez, Caritat Bagur-Calafat, Ana M Barrios-Franquesa, Marta Amor-Barbosa, Víctor Doménech-García, Pablo Bellosta-López, Almudena Buesa-Estéllez, Montserrat Girabent-Farrés","doi":"10.1177/02692155241312067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of integrating a specific balance-training program focused on static balance to the conventional rehabilitation program on dynamic balance, risk of falls, and activities of daily living (ADLs) in older adults post-stroke.DesignA single-blinded randomized controlled trial.SettingInstitutional Intermediate Care Hospital.SubjectsPost-stroke older adults in a subacute phase without cognitive impairment, aged 65 years and older, exhibiting trunk control in a seated position for 30 seconds without supporting the arms.InterventionThe control group underwent the usual treatment, consisting of 60-minute physiotherapy sessions, 5 days per week, for 30 days. The experimental group integrated into the usual treatment 15 minutes of the balance-training program (45 min + 15 min).Main measuresBalance impairment (Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), risk of falls (BBS), and independence for ADLs (Barthel Index)) were assessed at baseline, 15 and 30 days after the start of interventions.ResultsSeventy-one post-stroke patients (77.7 ± 9.0 years, 49.2% women) were randomized into the experimental (<i>n</i> = 35) or control (<i>n</i> = 36) groups. The experimental group showed improved dynamic balance at day 15 (Mini-BESTest: 2.90 [1.05-4.77], <i>p</i> = 0.003; BBS: 4.31 [1.41-7.23], <i>p</i> = 0.004) and day 30 (Mini-BESTest: 6.06 [2.85-9.27], <i>p</i> < 0.001; BBS: 8.24 [2.96-13.53], <i>p</i> = 0.003), as well as greater independence levels (11 [2.75-19.23], <i>p</i> = 0.010) compared to the control group. The control group showed higher risk of falls on day 15 (<i>p</i> = 0.035) and day 30 (<i>p</i> = 0.003) than the experimental group.ConclusionsA simple, easily reproducible approach designed by and for the older adult to rehabilitate post-stroke impairments effectively improved balance, functional gait, risk of falls, and ADLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241312067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241312067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of integrating a specific balance-training program focused on static balance to the conventional rehabilitation program on dynamic balance, risk of falls, and activities of daily living (ADLs) in older adults post-stroke.DesignA single-blinded randomized controlled trial.SettingInstitutional Intermediate Care Hospital.SubjectsPost-stroke older adults in a subacute phase without cognitive impairment, aged 65 years and older, exhibiting trunk control in a seated position for 30 seconds without supporting the arms.InterventionThe control group underwent the usual treatment, consisting of 60-minute physiotherapy sessions, 5 days per week, for 30 days. The experimental group integrated into the usual treatment 15 minutes of the balance-training program (45 min + 15 min).Main measuresBalance impairment (Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), risk of falls (BBS), and independence for ADLs (Barthel Index)) were assessed at baseline, 15 and 30 days after the start of interventions.ResultsSeventy-one post-stroke patients (77.7 ± 9.0 years, 49.2% women) were randomized into the experimental (n = 35) or control (n = 36) groups. The experimental group showed improved dynamic balance at day 15 (Mini-BESTest: 2.90 [1.05-4.77], p = 0.003; BBS: 4.31 [1.41-7.23], p = 0.004) and day 30 (Mini-BESTest: 6.06 [2.85-9.27], p < 0.001; BBS: 8.24 [2.96-13.53], p = 0.003), as well as greater independence levels (11 [2.75-19.23], p = 0.010) compared to the control group. The control group showed higher risk of falls on day 15 (p = 0.035) and day 30 (p = 0.003) than the experimental group.ConclusionsA simple, easily reproducible approach designed by and for the older adult to rehabilitate post-stroke impairments effectively improved balance, functional gait, risk of falls, and ADLs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短暂、重复的平衡训练对老年中风患者平衡和跌倒风险的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价以静态平衡为重点的特定平衡训练计划与传统康复计划相结合对老年人脑卒中后动态平衡、跌倒风险和日常生活活动(ADLs)的影响。设计:单盲随机对照试验。环境:机构中级护理医院。受试者:中风后亚急性期无认知障碍的老年人,年龄65岁及以上,在不支撑手臂的情况下,在坐姿中表现出30秒的躯干控制能力。干预:对照组接受常规治疗,包括60分钟的物理治疗,每周5天,持续30天。实验组在常规治疗中加入15分钟的平衡训练计划(45分钟+ 15分钟)。主要测量指标:在干预开始后的基线、15天和30天评估平衡障碍(Mini-BESTest和Berg平衡量表(BBS)、跌倒风险(BBS)和adl的独立性(Barthel指数)。结果:71例脑卒中后患者(77.7±9.0岁,女性49.2%)随机分为实验组(n = 35)和对照组(n = 36)。试验组在第15天动态平衡得到改善(mini - best: 2.90 [1.05-4.77], p = 0.003;BBS: 4.31 [1.41-7.23], p = 0.004)和第30天(mini - best: 6.06 [2.85-9.27], p = 0.003),并且与对照组相比,独立性水平更高(11 [2.75-19.23],p = 0.010)。对照组在第15天(p = 0.035)和第30天(p = 0.003)摔倒的风险高于实验组。结论:由老年人设计的一种简单、易于重复的方法可以有效地改善平衡、功能性步态、跌倒风险和ADLs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experience of people with shoulder osteoarthritis and their perceptions of non-surgical management: A qualitative study. Group versus individual delivery of upper limb intervention for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Response letter: The only defendable scientific position: A strong case against radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. 'It can be very complicated': A qualitative analysis of clinicians' practices and perspectives on treating adolescents with nonspecific persistent back pain. The influence of hearing loss and hearing aid use on experienced emotion in everyday listening situations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1