Luciano Tonetto Feltraco, Carolina Rossetto, Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Mariana Quirino Silveira Soares, Anne Caroline Oenning
{"title":"Utility of the radiological report function of an artificial intelligence system in interpreting CBCT images: a technical report.","authors":"Luciano Tonetto Feltraco, Carolina Rossetto, Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Mariana Quirino Silveira Soares, Anne Caroline Oenning","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this technical report was to assess whether the \"Radiological Report\" tool within the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat can achieve a satisfactory level of performance comparable to that of experienced dentomaxillofacial radiologists in interpreting cone-beam CT scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten cone-beam CT scans were carefully selected and analyzed using the AI tool, and they were also evaluated by two dentomaxillofacial radiologists. Observations related to tooth numeration, alterations in dental crowns, roots, and periodontal tissues were documented and subsequently compared to the AI findings. Kappa statistics, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to ascertain the degree of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the AI tool and the radiologists ranged from substantial to nearly perfect for identifying teeth, determining the number of roots and canals, assessing crown conditions, and detecting endodontic treatments. However, for tasks such as classifying bone loss, identifying posts, evaluating the quality of fillings, and appraising the situation of periodontal spaces, the agreement was deemed slight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"radiological report\" tool of the Diagnocat demonstrates satisfactory performance in reliably identifying teeth, roots, canals, assessing crown conditions, and detecting endodontic treatment. However, further investigations are needed to evaluate the tool's effectiveness in diagnosing posts, assessing the condition and quality of fillings, and determining the status of periodontal spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this technical report was to assess whether the "Radiological Report" tool within the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat can achieve a satisfactory level of performance comparable to that of experienced dentomaxillofacial radiologists in interpreting cone-beam CT scans.
Methods: Ten cone-beam CT scans were carefully selected and analyzed using the AI tool, and they were also evaluated by two dentomaxillofacial radiologists. Observations related to tooth numeration, alterations in dental crowns, roots, and periodontal tissues were documented and subsequently compared to the AI findings. Kappa statistics, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to ascertain the degree of agreement.
Results: The agreement between the AI tool and the radiologists ranged from substantial to nearly perfect for identifying teeth, determining the number of roots and canals, assessing crown conditions, and detecting endodontic treatments. However, for tasks such as classifying bone loss, identifying posts, evaluating the quality of fillings, and appraising the situation of periodontal spaces, the agreement was deemed slight.
Conclusions: The "radiological report" tool of the Diagnocat demonstrates satisfactory performance in reliably identifying teeth, roots, canals, assessing crown conditions, and detecting endodontic treatment. However, further investigations are needed to evaluate the tool's effectiveness in diagnosing posts, assessing the condition and quality of fillings, and determining the status of periodontal spaces.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X