Early Enteral Nutrition May Improve Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/1465194
Liangliang Zheng, Jingwei Duan, Baomin Duan
{"title":"Early Enteral Nutrition May Improve Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Liangliang Zheng, Jingwei Duan, Baomin Duan","doi":"10.1155/emmi/1465194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Aim:</b> International guidelines recommend early enteral nutrition (EEN) for critically ill patients. However, evidence supporting the optimal timing of EN in patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock (CS) is lacking. As such, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of EEN versus delayed EN in patients diagnosed with CS. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV version 2.2 database. Patients who received EN within 2 days of admission were assigned to the EEN group. A 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to control for bias in baseline characteristics and ensure the reliability of the results. To exclude the impact of confounders, an adjusted proportional hazards regression model was used to verify the independence between EEN and survival outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Of 1846 potentially eligible patients, 1398 received EEN and 448 received delayed EN. After 1:1 PSM, 818 patients were assigned to the EEN (<i>n</i> = 409) and delayed EN (<i>n</i> = 409) groups. Regarding cumulative survival, patients with CS receiving EEN experienced better 30-, 90-, and 180-day survival outcomes than the delayed EN group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.803 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-0.998], <i>p</i>=0.045; HR 0.729 [95% CI 0.599-0.889], <i>p</i>=0.001; and HR 0.778 [95% CI 0.644-0.938], <i>p</i>=0.008, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, EEN was found to be independently associated with survival outcomes. Moreover, EEN did not increase the risk(s) for ileus, aspiration pneumonia, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients who received delayed EN experienced longer hospital stays than those receiving EEN (17 days [interquartile range [IQR] 10-25] versus 12 days [IQR 7-19 days], respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> EEN was not associated with harm, but rather with improved survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with CS. Further studies are required to verify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1465194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/1465194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: International guidelines recommend early enteral nutrition (EEN) for critically ill patients. However, evidence supporting the optimal timing of EN in patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock (CS) is lacking. As such, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of EEN versus delayed EN in patients diagnosed with CS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV version 2.2 database. Patients who received EN within 2 days of admission were assigned to the EEN group. A 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to control for bias in baseline characteristics and ensure the reliability of the results. To exclude the impact of confounders, an adjusted proportional hazards regression model was used to verify the independence between EEN and survival outcomes. Results: Of 1846 potentially eligible patients, 1398 received EEN and 448 received delayed EN. After 1:1 PSM, 818 patients were assigned to the EEN (n = 409) and delayed EN (n = 409) groups. Regarding cumulative survival, patients with CS receiving EEN experienced better 30-, 90-, and 180-day survival outcomes than the delayed EN group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.803 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-0.998], p=0.045; HR 0.729 [95% CI 0.599-0.889], p=0.001; and HR 0.778 [95% CI 0.644-0.938], p=0.008, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, EEN was found to be independently associated with survival outcomes. Moreover, EEN did not increase the risk(s) for ileus, aspiration pneumonia, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients who received delayed EN experienced longer hospital stays than those receiving EEN (17 days [interquartile range [IQR] 10-25] versus 12 days [IQR 7-19 days], respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusion: EEN was not associated with harm, but rather with improved survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with CS. Further studies are required to verify these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期肠内营养可提高心源性休克患者的生存率。
背景和目的:国际指南推荐危重患者早期肠内营养(EEN)。然而,对于诊断为心源性休克(CS)的患者,尚缺乏支持EN最佳时机的证据。因此,本研究旨在比较诊断为CS的患者的EEN与延迟EN的临床结果和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用重症监护医学信息市场IV版2.2数据库的数据进行。入院2天内接受EN治疗的患者被分配到EEN组。采用1:1的倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析来控制基线特征的偏差,并确保结果的可靠性。为了排除混杂因素的影响,采用调整后的比例风险回归模型来验证EEN与生存结局之间的独立性。结果:在1846名可能符合条件的患者中,1398名接受了EN治疗,448名接受了延迟EN治疗。在1:1 PSM后,818例患者被分配到EEN (n = 409)和延迟EN (n = 409)组。在累积生存方面,CS患者接受EN治疗的30天、90天和180天生存结果优于延迟EN治疗组(风险比[HR] 0.803[95%可信区间[CI] 0.647-0.998], p=0.045;HR 0.729 [95% CI 0.599-0.889], p=0.001;HR 0.778 [95% CI 0.644-0.938], p=0.008)。在调整混杂因素后,发现EEN与生存结果独立相关。此外,EEN不会增加肠梗阻、吸入性肺炎或胃肠道出血的风险。延迟接受EN治疗的患者比接受EN治疗的患者住院时间更长(分别为17天[四分位数间距[IQR] 10-25]和12天[IQR] 7-19天];P < 0.001)。结论:在诊断为CS的患者中,EEN与伤害无关,而是与改善的生存结果相关。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
National Trends in Pulmonary Embolism Visit in United State Emergency Departments and Associated Costs (2006-2018). Enhanced Benefit of STA-MCA Bypass Surgery in Chronic Terminal Internal Carotid and/or Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Patients With Impaired Collateral Circulation: Introducing a Novel Assessment Approach for Collateral Compensation. Mapping Trends Regarding the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles. Reasons and Features of Patients Who Leave the Emergency Department Without Being Seen. Efficacy of the Protocol for Trauma Team Activation in Taipei: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1