Impact of mitomycin C on surgical outcomes of PAUL glaucoma implant in neovascular glaucoma: 12-month follow-up results.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1177/11206721251313835
Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak
{"title":"Impact of mitomycin C on surgical outcomes of PAUL glaucoma implant in neovascular glaucoma: 12-month follow-up results.","authors":"Ali Olgun, Murat Karapapak","doi":"10.1177/11206721251313835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) and the adjunctive impact of intraoperative Mitomycin C (MMC) on surgical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, comparative study included NVG patients who underwent PGI implantation. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 (PGI without MMC) and Group 2 (PGI with MMC). Inclusion criteria encompassed a minimum 12-month postoperative follow-up and preoperative light perception. Surgical success was defined as maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) between 6-21 mmHg without additional surgical intervention from the third month to the end of the 12-month follow-up. Failure due to hypotony was defined as an IOP ≤5 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled a total of eighty-one patients, with 40 patients in Group 1 and 41 in Group 2. There were no significant differences in the demographic data and baseline ocular characteristics between the groups. Group 1 required more medications at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.05 for all). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 85% for Group 1 and 87.8% for Group 2, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.140). Group 2 demonstrated a lower frequency of additional glaucoma procedures (p = 0.003) and delayed ripcord suture removal (p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating MMC as an adjunct to PGI implantation may improve IOP control and decrease the requirement for additional medications and surgical interventions in NVG patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the surgical success criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251313835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251313835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) and the adjunctive impact of intraoperative Mitomycin C (MMC) on surgical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods: This retrospective, comparative study included NVG patients who underwent PGI implantation. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 (PGI without MMC) and Group 2 (PGI with MMC). Inclusion criteria encompassed a minimum 12-month postoperative follow-up and preoperative light perception. Surgical success was defined as maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) between 6-21 mmHg without additional surgical intervention from the third month to the end of the 12-month follow-up. Failure due to hypotony was defined as an IOP ≤5 mmHg.

Results: The study enrolled a total of eighty-one patients, with 40 patients in Group 1 and 41 in Group 2. There were no significant differences in the demographic data and baseline ocular characteristics between the groups. Group 1 required more medications at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.05 for all). Surgical success rates at 12 months were 85% for Group 1 and 87.8% for Group 2, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.140). Group 2 demonstrated a lower frequency of additional glaucoma procedures (p = 0.003) and delayed ripcord suture removal (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Incorporating MMC as an adjunct to PGI implantation may improve IOP control and decrease the requirement for additional medications and surgical interventions in NVG patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the surgical success criterion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丝裂霉素C对PAUL青光眼植入治疗新生血管性青光眼手术疗效的影响:12个月随访结果
目的:评价PAUL青光眼植入物(PGI)的疗效及术中辅助丝裂霉素C (MMC)对新生血管性青光眼(NVG)患者手术疗效的影响。方法:回顾性比较研究纳入行PGI植入术的NVG患者。该队列分为两组:1组(无MMC的PGI)和2组(有MMC的PGI)。纳入标准包括至少12个月的术后随访和术前光感知。手术成功的定义是在第3个月至12个月随访结束时,维持眼压(IOP)在6-21 mmHg之间,没有额外的手术干预。低眼压导致的失败定义为IOP≤5mmhg。结果:共纳入81例患者,其中组1 40例,组2 41例。两组之间的人口统计学数据和基线眼部特征无显著差异。第一组在1、3、6和12个月时需要更多的药物治疗(p结论:将MMC作为PGI植入的辅助手段可以改善眼压控制,减少NVG患者对额外药物和手术干预的需求。然而,两组在手术成功标准方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Value of MRI-based radiomics models for predicting visual outcome in patients with MOG-optic neuritis: A preliminary study. Orbital textiloma: Two case reports and a literature review. Anterior chamber morphological and refractive outcomes following phacoemulsification in pseudoexfoliative eyes: A case-control study. Safety and efficacy of a modified suprachoroidal silicone tube shunt implant in primary open angle and pseudo-exfoliative glaucoma. A face-to-face survey on the practice of ophthalmic clinicians in the management of dry eye disease in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1