Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bupropion versus aripiprazole augmentation in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1815
Dong Yun Lee, Rae Woong Park, Soo Min Jeon
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bupropion versus aripiprazole augmentation in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.","authors":"Dong Yun Lee, Rae Woong Park, Soo Min Jeon","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects 10-30% of patients with major depressive disorder, leading to increased comorbidities, higher mortality, and significant economic and social burdens. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bupropion and aripiprazole as augmentation therapies for TRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, retrospective cohort study included adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of depressive disorder who met the criteria for TRD. Data were collected from a nationwide claims database in South Korea. Patients prescribed bupropion were matched 1:1 with those prescribed aripiprazole. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age. An as-treated analysis was performed as the primary analysis, and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed to identify different risk windows. The primary outcome was depression-related hospitalization, and the secondary outcomes were first-time diagnoses of movement disorder and seizure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,619 patients (bupropion: <i>n</i> = 1,568; aripiprazole: <i>n</i> = 4,051) were included in this study. Bupropion was associated with lower risks of hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.86) and movement disorders (HR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.85) than aripiprazole. No significant difference in seizure risk (HR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.30-1.31) was observed between the two treatments. The subgroup analysis of participants aged ≥60 years revealed no significant differences in the three outcomes between the two medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bupropion augmentation is associated with a significantly lower risk of depression-related re-hospitalization and movement disorders in patients with TRD. Therefore, bupropion augmentation can be a comprehensive treatment strategy for TRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects 10-30% of patients with major depressive disorder, leading to increased comorbidities, higher mortality, and significant economic and social burdens. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bupropion and aripiprazole as augmentation therapies for TRD.

Methods: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of depressive disorder who met the criteria for TRD. Data were collected from a nationwide claims database in South Korea. Patients prescribed bupropion were matched 1:1 with those prescribed aripiprazole. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age. An as-treated analysis was performed as the primary analysis, and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed to identify different risk windows. The primary outcome was depression-related hospitalization, and the secondary outcomes were first-time diagnoses of movement disorder and seizure.

Results: A total of 5,619 patients (bupropion: n = 1,568; aripiprazole: n = 4,051) were included in this study. Bupropion was associated with lower risks of hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.86) and movement disorders (HR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.85) than aripiprazole. No significant difference in seizure risk (HR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.30-1.31) was observed between the two treatments. The subgroup analysis of participants aged ≥60 years revealed no significant differences in the three outcomes between the two medications.

Conclusions: Bupropion augmentation is associated with a significantly lower risk of depression-related re-hospitalization and movement disorders in patients with TRD. Therefore, bupropion augmentation can be a comprehensive treatment strategy for TRD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安非他酮与阿立哌唑增强治疗成人难治性抑郁症的疗效和安全性比较:韩国一项全国性队列研究
背景:难治性抑郁症(TRD)影响10-30%的重度抑郁症患者,导致合并症增加、死亡率升高以及显著的经济和社会负担。本研究旨在比较安非他酮和阿立哌唑作为TRD辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。方法:这项以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究纳入了年龄≥18岁、诊断为抑郁症且符合TRD标准的成年人。数据是从韩国全国索赔数据库中收集的。服用安非他酮的患者与服用阿立哌唑的患者比例为1:1。按年龄进行亚组分析。进行治疗前分析作为主要分析,并进行意向治疗分析以确定不同的风险窗口。主要结局是与抑郁症相关的住院治疗,次要结局是首次诊断出运动障碍和癫痫发作。结果:共5619例患者(安非他酮:n = 1568;阿立哌唑(n = 4051)纳入本研究。安非他酮与较低的住院风险相关(危险比[HR]: 0.51;95%可信区间[CI] 0.29-0.86)和运动障碍(HR: 0.56;95% CI 0.36-0.85)优于阿立哌唑。癫痫发作风险无显著差异(HR: 0.65;95% CI 0.30-1.31)。年龄≥60岁受试者的亚组分析显示,两种药物的三个结局无显著差异。结论:安非他酮增强与TRD患者抑郁相关的再住院和运动障碍的风险显著降低相关。因此,安非他酮强化治疗可作为TRD的综合治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
期刊最新文献
Mental disorders into adulthood among adolescents placed in residential care: A prospective 10-year follow-up study - CORRIGENDUM. Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies. Mental health status of the European population and its determinants: A cross-national comparison study. Risk profiles before suicide mortality in patients with bipolar disorder across the lifespan. Prefrontal cortex stimulation prevents stress-induced HPA axis reactivity in people at familial risk of schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1