Clustering and drivers of symptoms observed at week six after antidepressant treatment in depressed outpatients.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1801
Michel Danon, Daphnée Poupon, Philippe Courtet, Philip Gorwood
{"title":"Clustering and drivers of symptoms observed at week six after antidepressant treatment in depressed outpatients.","authors":"Michel Danon, Daphnée Poupon, Philippe Courtet, Philip Gorwood","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive symptoms remaining after antidepressant treatment increase the risk of relapse and recurrence. We aimed to analyze the distribution and main drivers of remaining symptoms in patients with a major depressive episode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent samples of 8,229 and 5,926 patients from two large naturalistic studies were retrospectively analyzed. DSM-IV criteria for major depressive episodes were assessed during two face-to-face visits with clinicians: before the prescription of a new antidepressant, and after 6 weeks of treatment. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess baseline severity of anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both samples, two clusters of remaining symptoms were observed. The first cluster encompassed symptoms related to a negative emotional and cognitive bias and was specifically driven by the baseline severity of depression. The second cluster encompassed neurovegetative symptoms and was specifically driven by the baseline severity of anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The baseline anxiety-depressive balance of patients could be considered to adapt the treatment, focusing on emotional and cognitive symptoms with patients with high baseline severity of depression, and neurovegetative symptoms with patients with high baseline anxiety severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e85"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depressive symptoms remaining after antidepressant treatment increase the risk of relapse and recurrence. We aimed to analyze the distribution and main drivers of remaining symptoms in patients with a major depressive episode.

Methods: Two independent samples of 8,229 and 5,926 patients from two large naturalistic studies were retrospectively analyzed. DSM-IV criteria for major depressive episodes were assessed during two face-to-face visits with clinicians: before the prescription of a new antidepressant, and after 6 weeks of treatment. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess baseline severity of anxiety and depression.

Results: In both samples, two clusters of remaining symptoms were observed. The first cluster encompassed symptoms related to a negative emotional and cognitive bias and was specifically driven by the baseline severity of depression. The second cluster encompassed neurovegetative symptoms and was specifically driven by the baseline severity of anxiety.

Conclusions: The baseline anxiety-depressive balance of patients could be considered to adapt the treatment, focusing on emotional and cognitive symptoms with patients with high baseline severity of depression, and neurovegetative symptoms with patients with high baseline anxiety severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症门诊患者抗抑郁治疗后第6周观察到的症状聚类和驱动因素。
背景:抗抑郁药物治疗后仍存在的抑郁症状增加了复发和复发的风险。我们的目的是分析重性抑郁发作患者剩余症状的分布和主要驱动因素。方法:回顾性分析来自两项大型自然主义研究的8,229和5,926例独立样本。在与临床医生的两次面对面访问中评估DSM-IV重度抑郁发作的标准:在处方新的抗抑郁药之前和治疗6周后。医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)用于评估焦虑和抑郁的基线严重程度。结果:在两个样本中,观察到两组剩余症状。第一组包括与消极情绪和认知偏见相关的症状,并特别受到抑郁症基线严重程度的驱动。第二组包括神经植物症状,并特别受到焦虑基线严重程度的驱动。结论:可以考虑患者的基线焦虑抑郁平衡,以适应治疗,对基线抑郁严重程度高的患者,重点关注情绪和认知症状,对基线焦虑严重程度高的患者,重点关注神经植物症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
期刊最新文献
The impact of social distancing on mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: A nationwide study of 4.6 million Danish adults. Associations between IL-6 and trajectories of depressive symptoms across the life course: Evidence from ALSPAC and UK Biobank cohorts. European Psychiatry: 2024 in review. HOW TO IMPROVE PSYCHIATRIC NOSOGRAPHY IN THE XXI CENTURY: A PHENOMENOLOGIST'S VIEWPOINT. Excess costs of post-traumatic stress disorder related to child maltreatment in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1