Study on the sedative effect and safety of oral midazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in children during magnetic resonance imaging examination.
{"title":"Study on the sedative effect and safety of oral midazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in children during magnetic resonance imaging examination.","authors":"Yuancui Li, Rongzhu Lei","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1500277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial non-invasive diagnostic tool for pediatric diseases, requiring patients to remain still, often with the use of sedatives. Midazolam and dexmedetomidine are commonly used for sedation in children, but their combined effect needs further study. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combining intranasal dexmedetomidine (ID) with oral midazolam (OM) in children undergoing MRI, and assess its clinical feasibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 196 pediatric patients undergoing MRI from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to a control group (OM alone) or an observation group (OM + ID), with 98 cases each. Total sedation time, wake-up time, onset time, and adverse reactions were evaluated. Sedation effectiveness was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group had significantly longer total sedation time (<i>P</i> = 0.039) and higher one-time sedation success rate (<i>P</i> = 0.038) compared to the control group. The Ramsay score indicated better sedation effects in the observation group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Adverse events were similar between groups and resolved with rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining ID with OM provides effective sedation for pediatric MRI, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting its use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"12 ","pages":"1500277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1500277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial non-invasive diagnostic tool for pediatric diseases, requiring patients to remain still, often with the use of sedatives. Midazolam and dexmedetomidine are commonly used for sedation in children, but their combined effect needs further study. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combining intranasal dexmedetomidine (ID) with oral midazolam (OM) in children undergoing MRI, and assess its clinical feasibility.
Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 196 pediatric patients undergoing MRI from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to a control group (OM alone) or an observation group (OM + ID), with 98 cases each. Total sedation time, wake-up time, onset time, and adverse reactions were evaluated. Sedation effectiveness was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Score.
Results: The observation group had significantly longer total sedation time (P = 0.039) and higher one-time sedation success rate (P = 0.038) compared to the control group. The Ramsay score indicated better sedation effects in the observation group (P < 0.05). Adverse events were similar between groups and resolved with rest.
Conclusion: Combining ID with OM provides effective sedation for pediatric MRI, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting its use in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.