Pavement policies: unraveling the Norwegian ban on skateboarding.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1488825
Tommy Langseth, Nils Asle Bergsgard
{"title":"Pavement policies: unraveling the Norwegian ban on skateboarding.","authors":"Tommy Langseth, Nils Asle Bergsgard","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1488825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper investigates the historical prohibition of skateboarding in Norway from 1977 to 1989, a unique instance of such a comprehensive ban globally. The study aims to understand the circumstances leading to this ban and the rationale behind it. Two primary explanations emerged around the ban: one from a bureaucratic perspective citing risk management, and the other from skateboarders seeing it as a regulation of their counterculture. We argue that neither narrative alone is sufficient, proposing instead that other mechanisms were at play. Firstly, the ban was the inaugural case under the newly enacted Product Control Act, which was initially designed to address environmental issues. The State Pollution Control Authority found itself ill-prepared to handle the new responsibilities inherent in product control, resulting in diffuse responsibilities across several agencies. Secondly, the ambiguous categorization of skateboards as toys rather than sports equipment influenced the decision to enact the ban. The timing of the skateboard phenomenon coincided with the passing of the Product Control Act, suggesting a case of a solution seeking a problem. In conclusion, we posit that the skateboard ban resulted from a complex interplay of factors, including novel legislation, ambiguous responsibilities, cultural categorizations, and coincidental timing, rather than being solely a response to risk management or counterculture curtailment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1488825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1488825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the historical prohibition of skateboarding in Norway from 1977 to 1989, a unique instance of such a comprehensive ban globally. The study aims to understand the circumstances leading to this ban and the rationale behind it. Two primary explanations emerged around the ban: one from a bureaucratic perspective citing risk management, and the other from skateboarders seeing it as a regulation of their counterculture. We argue that neither narrative alone is sufficient, proposing instead that other mechanisms were at play. Firstly, the ban was the inaugural case under the newly enacted Product Control Act, which was initially designed to address environmental issues. The State Pollution Control Authority found itself ill-prepared to handle the new responsibilities inherent in product control, resulting in diffuse responsibilities across several agencies. Secondly, the ambiguous categorization of skateboards as toys rather than sports equipment influenced the decision to enact the ban. The timing of the skateboard phenomenon coincided with the passing of the Product Control Act, suggesting a case of a solution seeking a problem. In conclusion, we posit that the skateboard ban resulted from a complex interplay of factors, including novel legislation, ambiguous responsibilities, cultural categorizations, and coincidental timing, rather than being solely a response to risk management or counterculture curtailment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人行道政策:解除挪威对滑板的禁令。
本文研究了挪威从1977年到1989年对滑板运动的历史禁令,这是全球范围内全面禁止滑板运动的一个独特例子。这项研究旨在了解导致这一禁令的情况及其背后的理由。关于这项禁令,出现了两种主要的解释:一种是从官僚主义的角度出发,理由是风险管理;另一种是从滑板爱好者的角度出发,认为这是对他们的反主流文化的一种监管。我们认为,单独的叙述都是不够的,而是提出其他机制在起作用。首先,该禁令是新颁布的《产品控制法》(Product Control Act)的首个案例,该法案最初旨在解决环境问题。国家污染控制总局发现自己在处理产品控制中固有的新责任方面准备不足,导致几个机构的责任分散。其次,滑板作为玩具而不是运动器材的模糊分类影响了颁布禁令的决定。滑板现象发生的时间恰好与《产品控制法》的通过相吻合,这是一个寻求问题解决方案的案例。总之,我们认为滑板禁令是由多种因素复杂的相互作用造成的,包括新的立法、模糊的责任、文化分类和巧合的时机,而不仅仅是对风险管理或反主流文化限制的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting small to feel big: the psychology of weight cutting in combat sports. Strength and dynamic balance performance in soccer players in the United States: age, sex, and bilateral differences. An 8-week physical exercise intervention for e'athletes improves physical performance rather than short-term esports performance parameters - a randomized controlled trial. The effects of weather on physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults. Editorial: Physical activity, sports and health: reflections and challenges based on sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1