Evaluation of a self-screening tool and patient alert cards to help patients identify and manage severe adverse drug reactions.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9
Warisara Srisuriyachanchai, Chingching Foocharoen, Ajanee Mahakkanukrauh, Anthony R Cox, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul
{"title":"Evaluation of a self-screening tool and patient alert cards to help patients identify and manage severe adverse drug reactions.","authors":"Warisara Srisuriyachanchai, Chingching Foocharoen, Ajanee Mahakkanukrauh, Anthony R Cox, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have examined the use of self-screening tools and patient alert cards (PAC) for screening adverse drug reactions (ADRs).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the benefits of self-screening tools and PAC for screening ADRs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective study of outpatients was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The sample included patients over 18 years of age who were currently taking one of four prescription medicines-methotrexate, sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, or prednisolone. A self-screening tool was distributed to patients in either hard copy or on-line format depending on patient preference. Simple random sampling was used to assign patients to either receive a PAC or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 922 self-screening tools were distributed with 709 returned (71.5%). Over half (n = 388) of the respondents reported a total of 3437 symptoms that they credited to their medication. The most commonly reported symptom was angioedema (15.8%). The majority of patients (76.7%) used the temporal relationship between the onset of symptoms and the administration of the drug to decide if their ADR was associated with the drug and this proportion was higher in respondents who selected the online self-screening tool (70.7% and 83.2%, p = 0.040). Half of the patients reported high satisfaction with their PACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing patients with a self-screening tool and a PAC supported patients to report more ADRs compared to rates for spontaneous reporting alone. We propose that they should be provided to all patients to increase ADR reporting and to encourage HCPs to provide drug information, thereby improving patient medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01864-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the use of self-screening tools and patient alert cards (PAC) for screening adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Aim: To evaluate the benefits of self-screening tools and PAC for screening ADRs.

Method: A prospective study of outpatients was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The sample included patients over 18 years of age who were currently taking one of four prescription medicines-methotrexate, sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, or prednisolone. A self-screening tool was distributed to patients in either hard copy or on-line format depending on patient preference. Simple random sampling was used to assign patients to either receive a PAC or not.

Results: A total of 922 self-screening tools were distributed with 709 returned (71.5%). Over half (n = 388) of the respondents reported a total of 3437 symptoms that they credited to their medication. The most commonly reported symptom was angioedema (15.8%). The majority of patients (76.7%) used the temporal relationship between the onset of symptoms and the administration of the drug to decide if their ADR was associated with the drug and this proportion was higher in respondents who selected the online self-screening tool (70.7% and 83.2%, p = 0.040). Half of the patients reported high satisfaction with their PACs.

Conclusion: Providing patients with a self-screening tool and a PAC supported patients to report more ADRs compared to rates for spontaneous reporting alone. We propose that they should be provided to all patients to increase ADR reporting and to encourage HCPs to provide drug information, thereby improving patient medication safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估自我筛选工具和患者警报卡,以帮助患者识别和管理严重的药物不良反应。
背景:很少有研究调查使用自我筛选工具和患者警报卡(PAC)筛选药物不良反应(adr)。目的:评价自筛工具和PAC在adr筛查中的应用价值。方法:对某三级教学医院门诊患者进行前瞻性研究。样本包括18岁以上的患者,他们目前正在服用四种处方药中的一种——甲氨蝶呤、磺胺嘧啶、环孢素或强的松龙。根据患者的偏好,以硬拷贝或在线格式向患者分发自我筛选工具。使用简单的随机抽样来分配患者接受或不接受PAC。结果:共发放自筛工具922件,回收工具709件(71.5%)。超过一半(n = 388)的受访者报告了3437种症状,他们认为这些症状是由药物引起的。最常见的症状是血管性水肿(15.8%)。大多数患者(76.7%)使用症状发作与药物给药之间的时间关系来确定其不良反应是否与药物相关,而选择在线自我筛查工具的受访者中这一比例更高(70.7%和83.2%,p = 0.040)。一半的患者报告对他们的PACs非常满意。结论:提供患者自我筛选工具和PAC支持患者报告更多的不良反应,而不是单独的自发报告率。我们建议将其提供给所有患者,以增加ADR报告,并鼓励HCPs提供药物信息,从而提高患者的用药安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
期刊最新文献
Community pharmacists improving equitable access to contraceptive methods: a commentary. Bacillus coagulans TBC169 probiotics for intestinal function recovery after gynecological open surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient and hospital staff perspectives on introducing pharmacist-led medication reviews at an orthopedic ward: a mixed methods pilot study. Medication-induced causes of delirium in patients with and without dementia: a systematic review of published neurology guidelines. Defining polypharmacy in older adults: a cross-sectional comparison of prevalence estimates calculated according to active ingredient and unique product counts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1