Emergency department crowding in the Netherlands; evaluation of a real-time ambulance diversion dashboard.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00784-1
E C M Baan-Kooman, S Mol, M C van der Linden, M I Gaakeer, V A de Ridder
{"title":"Emergency department crowding in the Netherlands; evaluation of a real-time ambulance diversion dashboard.","authors":"E C M Baan-Kooman, S Mol, M C van der Linden, M I Gaakeer, V A de Ridder","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00784-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a growing concern worldwide and associated with negative effects. In 2013, 68% of Dutch ED-managers experienced crowding on several days of the week. This resulted into the introduction in phases of an ambulance diversion dashboard, in order to influence ED input. Increasing numbers of Dutch EDs have implemented this dashboard, visualizing regional ambulance diversions by means of a traffic light.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive study of a nationwide online survey of Dutch EDs, conducted between January and October 2023. It included both qualitative and quantitative questions. The outcomes and analysis are derived from descriptive data of respondents' experience of crowding as well as their usage and perceived effectiveness of the ambulance diversions dashboard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of the survey, 62 of 82 Dutch EDs (75.6%) actually used the dashboard, of which 56 EDs responded (90.3% response rate). 69.7% Of ED managers experienced ED crowding more than three times a week. Of the respondents using the dashboard, 52.8% reported it only occasionally alleviates ED inflow. The purported reasons are the limited number of patients affected by the red light (ambulance diversion) and the presence of regional crowding. The effects of the orange light (impending ambulance diversion) on ED input differ greatly among hospitals, mostly due to their own internal agreements. In accordance, many respondents (53.6%) expressed dissatisfaction with the resources available to them to alleviate crowding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After conducting a national survey, ED crowding is reported as a persisting nationwide problem with its prevalence largely unchanged since the introduction of the ambulance diversion dashboard. Most hospitals reported having insufficient resources to alleviate it. The effects of the ambulance diversion dashboard to decrease crowding are apparently limited because it affects a small portion of total ED presentations and because of the influence of regional crowding. The main function of the orange light is to increase ED throughput and output rather than reducing ED input.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00784-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a growing concern worldwide and associated with negative effects. In 2013, 68% of Dutch ED-managers experienced crowding on several days of the week. This resulted into the introduction in phases of an ambulance diversion dashboard, in order to influence ED input. Increasing numbers of Dutch EDs have implemented this dashboard, visualizing regional ambulance diversions by means of a traffic light.

Methods: This is a descriptive study of a nationwide online survey of Dutch EDs, conducted between January and October 2023. It included both qualitative and quantitative questions. The outcomes and analysis are derived from descriptive data of respondents' experience of crowding as well as their usage and perceived effectiveness of the ambulance diversions dashboard.

Results: At the time of the survey, 62 of 82 Dutch EDs (75.6%) actually used the dashboard, of which 56 EDs responded (90.3% response rate). 69.7% Of ED managers experienced ED crowding more than three times a week. Of the respondents using the dashboard, 52.8% reported it only occasionally alleviates ED inflow. The purported reasons are the limited number of patients affected by the red light (ambulance diversion) and the presence of regional crowding. The effects of the orange light (impending ambulance diversion) on ED input differ greatly among hospitals, mostly due to their own internal agreements. In accordance, many respondents (53.6%) expressed dissatisfaction with the resources available to them to alleviate crowding.

Conclusion: After conducting a national survey, ED crowding is reported as a persisting nationwide problem with its prevalence largely unchanged since the introduction of the ambulance diversion dashboard. Most hospitals reported having insufficient resources to alleviate it. The effects of the ambulance diversion dashboard to decrease crowding are apparently limited because it affects a small portion of total ED presentations and because of the influence of regional crowding. The main function of the orange light is to increase ED throughput and output rather than reducing ED input.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰急诊科拥挤状况;实时救护车分流仪表板的评估。
背景:急诊科(ED)拥挤是世界范围内日益关注的问题,并与负面影响有关。2013年,68%的荷兰ed经理一周中有几天会遇到人满为患的情况。这导致了救护车分流仪表板的引入,以影响急诊科的输入。越来越多的荷兰急诊室已经实施了这个仪表盘,通过红绿灯来可视化区域救护车改道。方法:这是一项描述性研究,在2023年1月至10月期间对荷兰ed进行了全国性的在线调查。它包括定性和定量问题。结果和分析来自于受访者拥挤体验的描述性数据,以及他们对救护车改道仪表板的使用和感知有效性。结果:在调查期间,82名荷兰ed中有62名(75.6%)实际使用了仪表板,其中56名ed做出了回应(回复率为90.3%)。69.7%的急诊科经理每周经历三次以上的急诊科拥挤。在使用仪表板的受访者中,52.8%的人表示它只是偶尔缓解ED流入。据称的原因是受红灯影响的病人数量有限(救护车转移)和区域拥挤的存在。橙灯(即将到来的救护车分流)对急诊室投入的影响在医院之间差异很大,主要是由于他们自己的内部协议。与此同时,许多受访者(53.6%)对可用于缓解拥挤的资源表示不满。结论:在进行了一项全国调查后,据报道,急诊科拥挤是一个持续存在的全国性问题,自引入救护车分流仪表板以来,其患病率基本上没有改变。大多数医院报告说,没有足够的资源来缓解这种情况。救护车分流仪表盘对减少拥挤的作用显然是有限的,因为它只影响了一小部分ED的总表现,而且由于区域拥挤的影响。橙灯的主要功能是增加ED的吞吐量和输出,而不是减少ED的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Emergency department crowding in the Netherlands; evaluation of a real-time ambulance diversion dashboard. A case of stroke as a unique sign of subclinical infective endocarditis by Abiotrophia defectiva: a case report. Retrospective analysis of trauma patients transported by dispatch monitored type B ambulances to Dhulikhel Hospital, Kavre, Nepal, 2019-2023. A novel tool for assessing pediatric emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a pilot study. Lack of standardization in the nomenclature of dating strokes or the desperate search for a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1