Patient and clinical characteristics associated with pain during cesarean delivery: a prospective single-center patient-reported outcome study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY International journal of obstetric anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104324
J Litman, R Bates, S R Lindheim, E E Sharpe, J C Ehrig, M P Hofkamp
{"title":"Patient and clinical characteristics associated with pain during cesarean delivery: a prospective single-center patient-reported outcome study.","authors":"J Litman, R Bates, S R Lindheim, E E Sharpe, J C Ehrig, M P Hofkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are multiple variables known to be associated with pain during cesarean delivery (PDCD), including patient-related factors, obstetrical and surgical factors, and anesthetic technique. The primary aim of this prospective patient-reported outcome study was to evaluate patient-related factors, including expectations and anxiety, and clinical variables associated with PDCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cesarean delivery from December 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 were enrolled 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. They completed the STAI-6 anxiety survey, a 13-item catastrophizing survey, a question about expected PDCD, and reported PDCD on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). We defined PDCD as a VAS score ≥30 mm. Demographic, physical, and clinical data were retrieved from the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 110 recruited patients with 40 (36%) reporting PDCD. Patients who had PDCD differed in race, surgical duration, and administration of supplemental systemic analgesic medication. A multivariate logistic regression identified that surgical duration, history of anxiety, intrapartum activation of epidural (versus spinal or combined spinal epidural) and Black race (versus White) were associated with PDCD. There were 33 (30%), 48 (44%), 14 (13%), 7 (6%), and 7 (6%) patients who reported no pain, pain less than expected, pain that was expected, more pain than expected, and much more pain than expected during their cesarean delivery, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort with a high reported PDCD rate, potentially modifiable variables associated with PDCD were initial anesthetic technique and surgical duration. A concerning finding was that most patients reported some level of PDCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"61 ","pages":"104324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are multiple variables known to be associated with pain during cesarean delivery (PDCD), including patient-related factors, obstetrical and surgical factors, and anesthetic technique. The primary aim of this prospective patient-reported outcome study was to evaluate patient-related factors, including expectations and anxiety, and clinical variables associated with PDCD.

Methods: Patients undergoing cesarean delivery from December 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 were enrolled 24 to 72 hours postoperatively. They completed the STAI-6 anxiety survey, a 13-item catastrophizing survey, a question about expected PDCD, and reported PDCD on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). We defined PDCD as a VAS score ≥30 mm. Demographic, physical, and clinical data were retrieved from the electronic medical record.

Results: There were 110 recruited patients with 40 (36%) reporting PDCD. Patients who had PDCD differed in race, surgical duration, and administration of supplemental systemic analgesic medication. A multivariate logistic regression identified that surgical duration, history of anxiety, intrapartum activation of epidural (versus spinal or combined spinal epidural) and Black race (versus White) were associated with PDCD. There were 33 (30%), 48 (44%), 14 (13%), 7 (6%), and 7 (6%) patients who reported no pain, pain less than expected, pain that was expected, more pain than expected, and much more pain than expected during their cesarean delivery, respectively.

Conclusions: In our cohort with a high reported PDCD rate, potentially modifiable variables associated with PDCD were initial anesthetic technique and surgical duration. A concerning finding was that most patients reported some level of PDCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与剖宫产疼痛相关的患者和临床特征:一项前瞻性单中心患者报告的结果研究
导言:已知与剖宫产(PDCD)疼痛相关的变量有多种,包括患者相关因素、产科和外科因素以及麻醉技术。这项前瞻性患者报告结果研究的主要目的是评估与患者相关的因素,包括期望和焦虑,以及与PDCD相关的临床变量。方法:2023年12月1日至2024年3月31日行剖宫产的患者,术后24 ~ 72小时入组。他们完成了焦虑问卷(STAI-6)、灾难化问卷(13项)、预期PDCD问卷(0-100 mm视觉模拟量表)。我们将PDCD定义为VAS评分≥30 mm。从电子病历中检索人口统计、物理和临床数据。结果:110例患者中有40例(36%)报告PDCD。患有PDCD的患者在种族、手术时间和补充全身镇痛药物的管理方面存在差异。多因素logistic回归发现,手术时间、焦虑史、分娩时硬膜外激活(与脊髓或脊髓联合硬膜外激活)和黑人(与白人)与PDCD相关。分别有33例(30%)、48例(44%)、14例(13%)、7例(6%)和7例(6%)患者在剖宫产过程中报告无疼痛、疼痛小于预期、疼痛在预期范围内、疼痛大于预期和疼痛远远大于预期。结论:在我们报道的PDCD发生率较高的队列中,与PDCD相关的潜在可修改变量是初始麻醉技术和手术时间。一个令人担忧的发现是,大多数患者报告有一定程度的PDCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
期刊最新文献
Embracing change: 2025 priorities and new structure of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. Factors affecting womens' attitude towards labor epidural analgesia in a culturally diverse population: a prospective patient-reported outcome study. Patient and clinical characteristics associated with pain during cesarean delivery: a prospective single-center patient-reported outcome study. Investigating disparity in labor epidural analgesia management in black vs. white women: a retrospective case-control study (2018-2022). Urinary retention during and after labor with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia: a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1