{"title":"Urinary retention during and after labor with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia: a prospective observational study","authors":"Willemijn Lips , Corina S. Sie , Liv M. Freeman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study investigates the incidence and risk factors for urinary retention during and after labor in women receiving programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia and evaluates the optimal bladder management strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study assessed urinary retention during voiding attempts every two to three hours during labor and postpartum, among women with labor epidural analgesia using PIEB. Urinary retention was defined as a post-void residual volume >150 mL, determined by catheterization after spontaneous voiding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 137 women included, with 277 voiding attempts during labor, the urinary retention rate was 20.6%, occurring in 48 women (35%). When the spontaneously voided volume was >50 mL, urinary retention was observed in less than 10% of attempts. Postpartum urinary retention occurred in nine women (6.7%) with a mean post-void residual volume of 1133 ± 447 mL; all were nulliparous, seven had induced labor, and five had an episiotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women who are able to successfully void during labor have a low risk of intrapartum urinary retention. We would recommend considering catheterization every 3 to 4 hours for women who are unable to urinate spontaneously, void less than 50 ml, or experience complete motor blockade during labor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24003388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study investigates the incidence and risk factors for urinary retention during and after labor in women receiving programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) analgesia and evaluates the optimal bladder management strategy.
Methods
This prospective observational study assessed urinary retention during voiding attempts every two to three hours during labor and postpartum, among women with labor epidural analgesia using PIEB. Urinary retention was defined as a post-void residual volume >150 mL, determined by catheterization after spontaneous voiding.
Results
Among 137 women included, with 277 voiding attempts during labor, the urinary retention rate was 20.6%, occurring in 48 women (35%). When the spontaneously voided volume was >50 mL, urinary retention was observed in less than 10% of attempts. Postpartum urinary retention occurred in nine women (6.7%) with a mean post-void residual volume of 1133 ± 447 mL; all were nulliparous, seven had induced labor, and five had an episiotomy.
Conclusions
Women who are able to successfully void during labor have a low risk of intrapartum urinary retention. We would recommend considering catheterization every 3 to 4 hours for women who are unable to urinate spontaneously, void less than 50 ml, or experience complete motor blockade during labor.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.