Accuracy and Performance Characteristics of Administrative Codes for the Diagnosis of Autoinflammatory Syndromes: A Discovery and Validation Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172
Saeyun Lee, Sujin Kim, Suzanne Segerstrom, Polly J Ferguson, Aleksander Lenert
{"title":"Accuracy and Performance Characteristics of Administrative Codes for the Diagnosis of Autoinflammatory Syndromes: A Discovery and Validation Study.","authors":"Saeyun Lee, Sujin Kim, Suzanne Segerstrom, Polly J Ferguson, Aleksander Lenert","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the accuracy and performance characteristics of administrative codes in diagnosing autoinflammatory syndromes (AISs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified potential AIS patients from the electronic medical records at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics and the Stead Family Children's Hospital using a screening filter based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases ( ICD-10 ) codes and interleukin-1 antagonists. Diagnostic criteria for adult-onset Still disease, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet disease (BD), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome and chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (SAPHO-CNO) were reviewed for each patient. Patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria were categorized as non-AIS. In this cross-sectional study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ICD codes in diagnosing AIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 502 patients with potential AIS, 338 patients (67%) had a true AIS diagnosis. Sensitivity ranged from 80% (SAPHO-CNO) to 100% (BD and FMF), and positive predictive value ranged from 15% (FMF) to 80% (SAPHO-CNO). Specificity ranged from 81% (FMF) to 99% (CAPS and SAPHO-CNO), whereas negative predictive value ranged from 98% (adult-onset Still disease) to 100% (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, BD, FMF, and CAPS). All ICD codes or code combinations for the diagnosis of specific AIS subtypes showed high accuracy with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated the accuracy of administrative codes for diagnosing AIS, supporting their use in constructing AIS cohorts for clinical outcomes research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"60-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the accuracy and performance characteristics of administrative codes in diagnosing autoinflammatory syndromes (AISs).

Methods: We identified potential AIS patients from the electronic medical records at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics and the Stead Family Children's Hospital using a screening filter based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases ( ICD-10 ) codes and interleukin-1 antagonists. Diagnostic criteria for adult-onset Still disease, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet disease (BD), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome and chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (SAPHO-CNO) were reviewed for each patient. Patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria were categorized as non-AIS. In this cross-sectional study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ICD codes in diagnosing AIS.

Results: Out of the 502 patients with potential AIS, 338 patients (67%) had a true AIS diagnosis. Sensitivity ranged from 80% (SAPHO-CNO) to 100% (BD and FMF), and positive predictive value ranged from 15% (FMF) to 80% (SAPHO-CNO). Specificity ranged from 81% (FMF) to 99% (CAPS and SAPHO-CNO), whereas negative predictive value ranged from 98% (adult-onset Still disease) to 100% (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, BD, FMF, and CAPS). All ICD codes or code combinations for the diagnosis of specific AIS subtypes showed high accuracy with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.89.

Conclusions: This study validated the accuracy of administrative codes for diagnosing AIS, supporting their use in constructing AIS cohorts for clinical outcomes research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断自身炎症综合征的行政代码的准确性和性能特征:一项发现和验证研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估和验证行政代码诊断自身炎症综合征(ais)的准确性和性能特点。方法:我们使用基于第10版国际疾病分类(ICD-10)代码和白细胞介素-1拮抗剂的筛选过滤器,从爱荷华大学医院和诊所和Stead家庭儿童医院的电子病历中识别潜在的AIS患者。对每位患者的成人发病Still病、全身性青少年特发性关节炎、behet病(BD)、家族性地中海热(FMF)、冷冻素相关周期性综合征(CAPS)、SAPHO(滑膜炎、痤疮、脓疱病、骨质增生和骨炎)综合征和慢性非细菌性骨髓炎(SAPHO- cno)的诊断标准进行了回顾。不符合诊断标准的患者被归类为非ais。在本横断面研究中,我们计算了ICD编码诊断AIS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和受者工作特征曲线下面积。结果:在502例潜在AIS患者中,338例患者(67%)有真正的AIS诊断。敏感性从80% (SAPHO-CNO)到100% (BD和FMF),阳性预测值从15% (FMF)到80% (SAPHO-CNO)。特异性范围从81% (FMF)到99% (CAPS和SAPHO-CNO),而阴性预测值范围从98%(成人发病Still病)到100%(系统性青少年特发性关节炎、BD、FMF和CAPS)。所有诊断特定AIS亚型的ICD编码或编码组合准确率均较高,受试者工作特征曲线下面积≥0.89。结论:本研究验证了诊断AIS的行政代码的准确性,支持将其用于构建AIS队列进行临床结果研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.
期刊最新文献
Just Autoimmunity? The Role of the Innate Immune Response in Lupus. Neuro-IgG4-Related Inflammatory Pseudotumor. Anti-RA33 Antibodies Are Present in Patients With Lyme Disease. Allopurinol Adherence in US Patients With Gout: Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2018-2021. Risk of Malignancy Related to Ixekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis or Axial Spondyloarthropathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1