Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques in the rotation of the maxillary occlusal plane after Le Fort I osteotomy.

Danilo de Moraes Castanha, Arthur Alves Thomaz de Aquino, Thalles Moreira Suassuna, Eduarda Gomes Onofre de Araújo, Fábio Andrey da Costa Araújo, Emanuel Sávio de Souza Andrade
{"title":"Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques in the rotation of the maxillary occlusal plane after Le Fort I osteotomy.","authors":"Danilo de Moraes Castanha, Arthur Alves Thomaz de Aquino, Thalles Moreira Suassuna, Eduarda Gomes Onofre de Araújo, Fábio Andrey da Costa Araújo, Emanuel Sávio de Souza Andrade","doi":"10.4317/jced.62324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze the biomechanical and functional characteristics of different maxillary fixation techniques after Le Fort I osteotomy and occlusal plane rotation, using the finite element method to simulate the mechanical behavior of three different osteosynthesis approaches.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a virtual experimental study carried out using finite element analysis to compare three different osteosynthesis techniques after Le Fort I osteotomy and rotation of the maxillary occlusal plane. Three configurations were tested: four-point fixation with \"L\" plates (C1), two-point fixation with \"L\" plates (C2), and two-point fixation with pre-modeled Lindorf plates (C3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis indicated that set C1 showed maximum displacement in the anterior region, while C2 and C3 showed displacement in the posterior region. The von Mises stresses revealed that C1 exceeded the yield limit of titanium, indicating potential failure. On the other hand, C2 and C3 showed a more balanced distribution of stresses within acceptable limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fixation techniques with fewer points (C2 and C3) proved to be as effective, or even superior, to the traditional four-point fixation method (C1), offering better stress distribution and lower mechanical stress. <b>Key words:</b>Le Fort osteotomy, Internal fixation, Finite elements, Biomechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"16 12","pages":"e1530-e1537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To analyze the biomechanical and functional characteristics of different maxillary fixation techniques after Le Fort I osteotomy and occlusal plane rotation, using the finite element method to simulate the mechanical behavior of three different osteosynthesis approaches.

Material and methods: This is a virtual experimental study carried out using finite element analysis to compare three different osteosynthesis techniques after Le Fort I osteotomy and rotation of the maxillary occlusal plane. Three configurations were tested: four-point fixation with "L" plates (C1), two-point fixation with "L" plates (C2), and two-point fixation with pre-modeled Lindorf plates (C3).

Results: The analysis indicated that set C1 showed maximum displacement in the anterior region, while C2 and C3 showed displacement in the posterior region. The von Mises stresses revealed that C1 exceeded the yield limit of titanium, indicating potential failure. On the other hand, C2 and C3 showed a more balanced distribution of stresses within acceptable limits.

Conclusions: The fixation techniques with fewer points (C2 and C3) proved to be as effective, or even superior, to the traditional four-point fixation method (C1), offering better stress distribution and lower mechanical stress. Key words:Le Fort osteotomy, Internal fixation, Finite elements, Biomechanics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le Fort I型截骨术后上颌咬合平面旋转不同固定技术的生物力学评价。
背景:为了分析Le Fort I型截骨和咬合平面旋转后不同上颌固定方式的生物力学和功能特点,采用有限元方法模拟三种不同入路的力学行为。材料和方法:这是一项虚拟实验研究,使用有限元分析来比较Le Fort I截骨和上颌咬合平面旋转后三种不同的植骨技术。测试了三种配置:“L”钢板的四点固定(C1),“L”钢板的两点固定(C2)和预先建模的Lindorf钢板的两点固定(C3)。结果:分析显示C1组移位最大的是前位区,C2和C3组移位最大的是后位区。von Mises应力表明,C1超过了钛的屈服极限,预示着潜在的失效。另一方面,C2和C3在可接受范围内的应力分布更为平衡。结论:少点固定技术(C2和C3)与传统的四点固定方法(C1)一样有效,甚至更好,应力分布更好,机械应力更小。关键词:Le Fort截骨术,内固定,有限元,生物力学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
期刊最新文献
Oral manifestations of syphilis: A report of six cases. Oral neurovascular hamartoma: An independent entity not associated to rhabdoid tumors. The effect of replacing dental needles between subsequent inferior alveolar nerve blocks on pain and trismus - a double blinded, randomised split-mouth study. Glandular odontogenic cyst: Comprehensive clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characterization. Influence of anterior open bite on oral health-related quality of life. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1