Impact of polypharmacy on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Arrhythmia Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1002/joa3.13185
Yuma Ono MD, Hidekazu Kondo MD, PhD, Taisuke Harada MD, Kunio Yufu MD, PhD, Hiroki Sato MD, PhD, Kazuki Mitarai MD, Keisuke Yonezu MD, PhD, Katsunori Tawara MD, Hidefumi Akioka MD, PhD, Naohiko Takahashi MD, PhD
{"title":"Impact of polypharmacy on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy","authors":"Yuma Ono MD,&nbsp;Hidekazu Kondo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Taisuke Harada MD,&nbsp;Kunio Yufu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hiroki Sato MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kazuki Mitarai MD,&nbsp;Keisuke Yonezu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Katsunori Tawara MD,&nbsp;Hidefumi Akioka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Naohiko Takahashi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence rates of heart failure (HF) and hyperpolypharmacy have increased with the aging population. While a negative impact of hyperpolypharmacy on HF clinical outcomes has already been reported, the effects of hyperpolypharmacy on patients with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively evaluated data from 147 patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT between March 2004 and June 2020. Patients were divided into nonpolypharmacy (&lt;5 medications) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) groups, as well as nonhyperpolypharmacy (&lt;10 medications) and hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 medications) groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean age of the study population was 70.6 ± 9.7 years, and 90 patients (67.2%) were male. The median number of medications used was 10 (interquartile range: 7–13, range: 2–24); Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that the hyperpolypharmacy group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and all-cause mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Long-term survival in terms of MACE and all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the polypharmacy with cardiovascular medication and nonpolypharmacy with cardiovascular medication groups. By contrast, the polypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of MACE (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and all-cause mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.003) than the nonpolypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Hyperpolypharmacy was significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT. Noncardiovascular polypharmacy may underlie the harmful effects of hyperpolypharmacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prevalence rates of heart failure (HF) and hyperpolypharmacy have increased with the aging population. While a negative impact of hyperpolypharmacy on HF clinical outcomes has already been reported, the effects of hyperpolypharmacy on patients with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated data from 147 patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT between March 2004 and June 2020. Patients were divided into nonpolypharmacy (<5 medications) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) groups, as well as nonhyperpolypharmacy (<10 medications) and hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 medications) groups.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 70.6 ± 9.7 years, and 90 patients (67.2%) were male. The median number of medications used was 10 (interquartile range: 7–13, range: 2–24); Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that the hyperpolypharmacy group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; p = 0.004) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.005). Long-term survival in terms of MACE and all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the polypharmacy with cardiovascular medication and nonpolypharmacy with cardiovascular medication groups. By contrast, the polypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of MACE (p = 0.006) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.003) than the nonpolypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group.

Conclusions

Hyperpolypharmacy was significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT. Noncardiovascular polypharmacy may underlie the harmful effects of hyperpolypharmacy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种药物对晚期心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步化治疗的临床结果的影响。
背景:随着人口老龄化,心力衰竭(HF)和过度用药的患病率增加。虽然已经有报道称过度用药对HF临床结果有负面影响,但过度用药对接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的射血分数降低(HFrEF)的晚期HF患者的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性评估了2004年3月至2020年6月期间接受CRT治疗的147例晚期HFrEF患者的数据。结果:研究人群平均年龄为70.6±9.7岁,男性90例(67.2%)。用药中位数为10种(四分位数间:7-13种,范围:2-24种);Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,就主要不良心血管事件(MACE;P = 0.004)和全因死亡率(P = 0.005)。多药组与非多药组在MACE和全因死亡率方面的长期生存率无显著差异。相比之下,多药联合非心血管用药组在MACE方面的长期生存率(p = 0.006)和全因死亡率(p = 0.003)均明显低于非多药联合非心血管用药组。结论:在接受CRT治疗的晚期HFrEF患者中,过度用药与不良心血管结局显著相关。非心血管多重用药可能是过度多重用药有害作用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia: A Systematic Review. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Children: A 14-Year Population-Based Study. An Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Predictor of Successful Micra Implantation on the Right Ventricular Mid-Septum. Anatomical Predictors of Optimal Cryoballoon Size Selection: A Prospective Comparison of 28 mm Versus 31 mm Size-Adjustable Balloon Modes. Reduced Vascular Complications After Catheter Ablation Applying Sonography-Guidance and Modified Postprocedural Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1