Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-management ability assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111049
Hang Li , Xue-Yun Wang , Ling-Yan Bao , Jia-Lei Zheng , Jing Li
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-management ability assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury","authors":"Hang Li ,&nbsp;Xue-Yun Wang ,&nbsp;Ling-Yan Bao ,&nbsp;Jia-Lei Zheng ,&nbsp;Jing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to develop a scale to assess the self-management capability of patients with spinal cord injuries and provide an evaluation tool for implementing targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Drawing upon the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC) and the <em>International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health</em> (ICF) framework, an initial version of the Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale was developed through literature analysis, semi-structured interviews, and expert inquiry using the Delphi method. Subsequently, two rounds of inquiries were conducted with a panel of 20 experts to refine items in the scale based on the feedback obtained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The two rounds of expert inquiry questionnaires yielded an effective recovery rate of 100%, with expert authority coefficients for the two rounds of inquiries being 0.925 and 0.940, respectively. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance for the two rounds was 0.200 and 0.317, respectively. The finalized 54-item Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale developed in this study comprises five dimensions: disease knowledge management, daily behavior management, social-psychological management, information and resource management, and rehabilitation exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale was developed based on the Delphi method. It may be used to evaluate the level of self-management capability of patients with spinal cord injuries but warrants further empirical verification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 111049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825000219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to develop a scale to assess the self-management capability of patients with spinal cord injuries and provide an evaluation tool for implementing targeted interventions.

Methods

Drawing upon the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework, an initial version of the Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale was developed through literature analysis, semi-structured interviews, and expert inquiry using the Delphi method. Subsequently, two rounds of inquiries were conducted with a panel of 20 experts to refine items in the scale based on the feedback obtained.

Results

The two rounds of expert inquiry questionnaires yielded an effective recovery rate of 100%, with expert authority coefficients for the two rounds of inquiries being 0.925 and 0.940, respectively. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance for the two rounds was 0.200 and 0.317, respectively. The finalized 54-item Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale developed in this study comprises five dimensions: disease knowledge management, daily behavior management, social-psychological management, information and resource management, and rehabilitation exercise.

Conclusion

A Spinal Cord Injury Patient Self-Management Capability Assessment Scale was developed based on the Delphi method. It may be used to evaluate the level of self-management capability of patients with spinal cord injuries but warrants further empirical verification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者自我管理能力评定量表的编制及心理测量学评价。
目的:本研究的目的是制定一个评估脊髓损伤患者自我管理能力的量表,并为实施有针对性的干预提供评估工具。方法:借鉴健康行为改变综合理论(ITHBC)和国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架,通过文献分析、半结构化访谈和专家咨询,采用德尔菲法编制脊髓损伤患者自我管理能力评估量表的初始版本。随后,由20名专家组成的小组进行了两轮调查,以便根据所获得的反馈意见改进量表中的项目。结果:两轮专家问询问卷的有效回收率为100%,两轮专家权威系数分别为0.925和0.940。两轮的肯德尔一致性系数分别为0.200和0.317。本研究编制的脊髓损伤患者自我管理能力评估量表共54项,包括疾病知识管理、日常行为管理、社会心理管理、信息资源管理和康复训练五个维度。结论:采用德尔菲法编制了脊髓损伤患者自我管理能力评估量表。它可以用来评价脊髓损伤患者的自我管理能力水平,但需要进一步的实证验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
Current and future clinical trials for the use of neuromodulation in the treatment of stroke: A review of the clinical Trials.gov database Risk factors for residual dizziness after successful repositioning in elderly patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo Clinical and imaging features and treatment response of anti-NMDAR encephalitis combined with MOGAD Validation of the Korean version of the Bad Sobernheim stress Questionnaire-Brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Pure endoscopic presigmoid infralabyrinthine approach for jugular foramen tumors: Operative technique and early results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1