The Evaluation of the Pterygomaxillary Separation Pattern in Le Fort I Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011088
Mustafa M Faisal, Salwan Y Bede
{"title":"The Evaluation of the Pterygomaxillary Separation Pattern in Le Fort I Osteotomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.","authors":"Mustafa M Faisal, Salwan Y Bede","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pterygomaxillary separation (PMS) is an important step in Le Fort I osteotomy procedure, without which complete mobilization of the maxilla cannot be achieved. The aim of this study was to evaluate PMS patterns and their relationship with the anatomic measurements in Le Fort I osteotomy. In this prospective observational study cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the anatomic variables of the pterygomaxillary junction (PMJ) region including thickness, width, the distance between the most concave point at the lateral surface of PMJ and the greater palatine foramen (C-GPF), and the angle preoperatively, and the separation patterns postoperatively divided into the clean-cut type, maxillary sinus type, and the pterygoid fracture type. Twenty-seven patients (54 sides) were included in this study. Nineteen females (70.4%) and 8 males (29.6%) with a mean (standard deviation) of 22.1 (5.5) years. The mean PMJ thickness, width, C-GPF, and angle were 5.6 mm, 8.6 mm, 6.55 mm, and 91.5 degrees, respectively. The most common PMS pattern was the clean-cut type (38/54, 70.4%), followed by the pterygoid plate fracture type (10/54, 18.5%), and the maxillary sinus type (6/54, 11.1%). There were non-significant relationships between the anatomic variables of PMJ and PMS patterns (thickness P=0.179, width P=0.234, C-GPF P=0.174, and angle P=0.792). There were non-significant relationships between PMS patterns and age, sex, and skeletal classification of the patients (P= 0.941, 0.211, and 0.519, respectively).</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pterygomaxillary separation (PMS) is an important step in Le Fort I osteotomy procedure, without which complete mobilization of the maxilla cannot be achieved. The aim of this study was to evaluate PMS patterns and their relationship with the anatomic measurements in Le Fort I osteotomy. In this prospective observational study cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the anatomic variables of the pterygomaxillary junction (PMJ) region including thickness, width, the distance between the most concave point at the lateral surface of PMJ and the greater palatine foramen (C-GPF), and the angle preoperatively, and the separation patterns postoperatively divided into the clean-cut type, maxillary sinus type, and the pterygoid fracture type. Twenty-seven patients (54 sides) were included in this study. Nineteen females (70.4%) and 8 males (29.6%) with a mean (standard deviation) of 22.1 (5.5) years. The mean PMJ thickness, width, C-GPF, and angle were 5.6 mm, 8.6 mm, 6.55 mm, and 91.5 degrees, respectively. The most common PMS pattern was the clean-cut type (38/54, 70.4%), followed by the pterygoid plate fracture type (10/54, 18.5%), and the maxillary sinus type (6/54, 11.1%). There were non-significant relationships between the anatomic variables of PMJ and PMS patterns (thickness P=0.179, width P=0.234, C-GPF P=0.174, and angle P=0.792). There were non-significant relationships between PMS patterns and age, sex, and skeletal classification of the patients (P= 0.941, 0.211, and 0.519, respectively).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束ct对Le Fort I型截骨术翼颌分离模式的评价。
翼颌分离(PMS)是Le Fort I型截骨术的重要步骤,没有它就无法实现上颌的完全活动。本研究的目的是评估经前综合症模式及其与Le Fort I截骨术解剖测量的关系。本前瞻性观察研究采用锥束ct (cone beam computed tomography, CBCT)术前测量翼颌交界处(pterygomaxillary junction, PMJ)区域的厚度、宽度、PMJ外侧最凹点与腭大孔(C-GPF)的距离、角度等解剖变量,并将术后分离模式分为清切型、上颌窦型和翼状骨骨折型。27例患者(54侧)纳入本研究。女性19例(70.4%),男性8例(29.6%),平均(标准差)为22.1(5.5)岁。PMJ的平均厚度为5.6 mm,宽度为8.6 mm, C-GPF为6.55 mm,角度为91.5°。最常见的PMS类型为净切型(38/54,70.4%),其次为翼状骨板型(10/54,18.5%)和上颌窦型(6/54,11.1%)。PMJ解剖变量与PMS形态(厚度P=0.179,宽度P=0.234, C-GPF P=0.174,角度P=0.792)无显著相关。经前症候群类型与患者年龄、性别、骨骼分型无显著相关(P值分别为0.941、0.211、0.519)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Angiomyolipoma Suspected to be the Lobular Capillary Hemangioma in the Nasal Cavity. Expanded Forehead Flaps Based on the Frontal Branch of the Superficial Temporal Artery: Patterns, Techniques, and Outcomes in Cervicofacial Reconstruction. Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes Combined With Bone Grafts Ameliorate Bone Regeneration in Mandibular Defects. Analysis of the Volume of the Liposuction-Derived Adipose Tissue in Clinical Application. Delayed Superficial Temporal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Minor Trauma in a Post-facelift Patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1