Indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab and a C1-esterase inhibitor in pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of comparative effectiveness research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0110
Maureen Watt, Rachel Goldgrub, Mia Malmenäs, Katrin Haeussler
{"title":"Indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab and a C1-esterase inhibitor in pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema.","authors":"Maureen Watt, Rachel Goldgrub, Mia Malmenäs, Katrin Haeussler","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare the efficacy and safety of lanadelumab versus other approved long-term prophylaxis (LTP) treatments in patients with pediatric hereditary angioedema (HAE) aged <12 years. <b>Materials</b> <b>&</b> <b>methods:</b> A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies of LTP in patients with HAE aged <12 years. Two studies met the inclusion criteria in an indirect treatment comparison of efficacy and safety data in pediatric HAE patients. These were for lanadelumab (SPRING, NCT04070326) and intravenous-C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH[IV], NCT02052141). A propensity score analysis used individual patient-level data from both studies in a logistic regression model to estimate inverse probability weights. To avoid convergence issues and an underpowered analysis due to the small sample size (n = 29), the base case was defined as Poisson regression analyses on monthly attack rate adjusting for one covariate (baseline attack rate). Model selection among unadjusted, adjusted and weighted regression models was conducted through the Akaike and Bayesian Information Criteria. <b>Results:</b> Lanadelumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) reduced the monthly HAE attack rate by 82.1% versus C1-INH(IV) 1000 IU twice weekly (every 3-4 days [BIW]; rate ratio [RR], 0.1792 [95% CI: 0.0296-1.0853]) and by 88.9% versus C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW (RR: 0.1107 [95% CI: 0.0234-0.5239]). Treatment with lanadelumab Q2W reduced the risk of total adverse events by 56.2% versus C1-INH(IV) 1000 IU BIW (RR:0.4377 [95% CI: 0.1536-1.2469]) and by 66.0% versus C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW (RR: 0.3401 [95% CI: 0.1234-0.9371]). <b>Conclusion:</b> This exploratory analysis suggested a trend toward greater efficacy and fewer adverse events with lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W compared with C1-INH(IV) BIW 1000 IU and 500 IU in pediatric patients with HAE. Future studies could potentially assess larger samples over longer periods of time for the long-term preventative efficacy, safety and tolerability of lanadelumab and C1-INH(IV).</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of lanadelumab versus other approved long-term prophylaxis (LTP) treatments in patients with pediatric hereditary angioedema (HAE) aged <12 years. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies of LTP in patients with HAE aged <12 years. Two studies met the inclusion criteria in an indirect treatment comparison of efficacy and safety data in pediatric HAE patients. These were for lanadelumab (SPRING, NCT04070326) and intravenous-C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH[IV], NCT02052141). A propensity score analysis used individual patient-level data from both studies in a logistic regression model to estimate inverse probability weights. To avoid convergence issues and an underpowered analysis due to the small sample size (n = 29), the base case was defined as Poisson regression analyses on monthly attack rate adjusting for one covariate (baseline attack rate). Model selection among unadjusted, adjusted and weighted regression models was conducted through the Akaike and Bayesian Information Criteria. Results: Lanadelumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) reduced the monthly HAE attack rate by 82.1% versus C1-INH(IV) 1000 IU twice weekly (every 3-4 days [BIW]; rate ratio [RR], 0.1792 [95% CI: 0.0296-1.0853]) and by 88.9% versus C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW (RR: 0.1107 [95% CI: 0.0234-0.5239]). Treatment with lanadelumab Q2W reduced the risk of total adverse events by 56.2% versus C1-INH(IV) 1000 IU BIW (RR:0.4377 [95% CI: 0.1536-1.2469]) and by 66.0% versus C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW (RR: 0.3401 [95% CI: 0.1234-0.9371]). Conclusion: This exploratory analysis suggested a trend toward greater efficacy and fewer adverse events with lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W compared with C1-INH(IV) BIW 1000 IU and 500 IU in pediatric patients with HAE. Future studies could potentially assess larger samples over longer periods of time for the long-term preventative efficacy, safety and tolerability of lanadelumab and C1-INH(IV).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
lanadelumab和c1酯酶抑制剂对遗传性血管性水肿患儿的间接治疗比较。
目的:比较lanadelumab与其他批准的长期预防(LTP)治疗儿童遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)老年患者的疗效和安全性材料和方法:进行了系统的文献综述,以确定HAE老年患者LTP的研究结果:lanadelumab 150 mg / 2周(Q2W)与C1-INH(IV)相比,每月HAE发作率降低82.1%(每3-4天[BIW];发病率比[RR], 0.1792 [95% CI: 0.0296-1.0853]),与C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW相比,发病率比为88.9% (RR: 0.1107 [95% CI: 0.0234-0.5239])。与C1-INH(IV) 1000 IU BIW相比,使用lanadelumab Q2W治疗总不良事件的风险降低了56.2% (RR:0.4377 [95% CI: 0.1536-1.2469]),与C1-INH(IV) 500 IU BIW相比降低了66.0% (RR: 0.3401 [95% CI: 0.1234-0.9371])。结论:这项探索性分析表明,在儿童HAE患者中,与C1-INH(IV) BIW 1000 IU和500 IU相比,lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W具有更大的疗效和更少的不良事件。未来的研究可能会在更长的时间内评估更大的样本,以评估lanadelumab和C1-INH(IV)的长期预防功效、安全性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world studies of crizotinib in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: experience from China. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab combined with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain. The burden of Alagille syndrome: uncovering the potential of emerging therapeutics - a comprehensive systematic literature review. A real-world analysis of antidepressant medications in US veterans aged 60 years and older: a comparative analysis. Indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab and a C1-esterase inhibitor in pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1