Aqueous Angiography Guided Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in High versus Low Aqueous Humor Outflow Regions in POAG: A Pilot RCT.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002537
Tanuj Dada, Ashi Gupta, Nitika Beri, Alex S Huang, Namrata Sharma, Dewang Angmo, Prafulla K Maharana, Amar Pujari
{"title":"Aqueous Angiography Guided Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in High versus Low Aqueous Humor Outflow Regions in POAG: A Pilot RCT.","authors":"Tanuj Dada, Ashi Gupta, Nitika Beri, Alex S Huang, Namrata Sharma, Dewang Angmo, Prafulla K Maharana, Amar Pujari","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Trabecular cutting minimally invasive glaucoma surgery like bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) when performed in baseline aqueous angiography identified low aqueous humor outflow regions, results in greater success of intraocular pressure reduction.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the efficacy of Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy (BANG) in high versus low aqueous humor outflow (AHO) regions as determined by Aqueous Angiography(AA) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-centre, pilot, randomized control trial recruited 30 eyes of 30 patients of POAG and visually significant cataract (45-80 y) and were randomised into two groups (\"A\": BANG performed in the high-flow regions and \"B\": BANG performed in the low-flow regions) of 15 each. AA was performed using indocyanine green dye (0.1%) to identify baseline high- and low-flow regions of the AHO pathways followed by BANG in these respective regions as per randomisation. Preoperative and postoperative data on IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) and any complications were noted over 6 months. Overall success was defined as achieving an IOP ≤15 mm Hg and ≥6 mm Hg at 6 months of follow-up with AGMs (qualified success) or without AGMs (complete success).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AA revealed high-flow regions of AHO pathways in the nasal quadrant and low-flow regions of AHO pathways in the temporal quadrant in all 30 patients. Both groups had comparable demographic composition [group A age: 65.3±6.48 y and male: female (14:1) and group B age: 64.6±7.08 y and male: female (13:2)]. The mean preoperative IOPs [group A (17.27±3.43 mm Hg); group B (17.60±5.42 mm Hg)] (P=0.842) and mean postoperative IOP at 6 months [group A (15.6±4.98 mm Hg); group B (13.13±2.29 mm Hg)] (P=0.09) were similar. However, lower qualified success was seen in group A (40.00%) compared to group B (86.67%; P=0.021). Survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis was higher in group B (P=0.021). Complications were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term results of BANG in low-flow AHO regions show enhanced success compared to those in high-flow AHO regions. This study suggests that trabecular cutting minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (like BANG) may be performed in baseline low-flow AHO regions (temporal quadrant) instead of the high-flow AHO (nasal quadrant) regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: Trabecular cutting minimally invasive glaucoma surgery like bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) when performed in baseline aqueous angiography identified low aqueous humor outflow regions, results in greater success of intraocular pressure reduction.

Purpose: To study the efficacy of Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy (BANG) in high versus low aqueous humor outflow (AHO) regions as determined by Aqueous Angiography(AA) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: A prospective, single-centre, pilot, randomized control trial recruited 30 eyes of 30 patients of POAG and visually significant cataract (45-80 y) and were randomised into two groups ("A": BANG performed in the high-flow regions and "B": BANG performed in the low-flow regions) of 15 each. AA was performed using indocyanine green dye (0.1%) to identify baseline high- and low-flow regions of the AHO pathways followed by BANG in these respective regions as per randomisation. Preoperative and postoperative data on IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) and any complications were noted over 6 months. Overall success was defined as achieving an IOP ≤15 mm Hg and ≥6 mm Hg at 6 months of follow-up with AGMs (qualified success) or without AGMs (complete success).

Results: AA revealed high-flow regions of AHO pathways in the nasal quadrant and low-flow regions of AHO pathways in the temporal quadrant in all 30 patients. Both groups had comparable demographic composition [group A age: 65.3±6.48 y and male: female (14:1) and group B age: 64.6±7.08 y and male: female (13:2)]. The mean preoperative IOPs [group A (17.27±3.43 mm Hg); group B (17.60±5.42 mm Hg)] (P=0.842) and mean postoperative IOP at 6 months [group A (15.6±4.98 mm Hg); group B (13.13±2.29 mm Hg)] (P=0.09) were similar. However, lower qualified success was seen in group A (40.00%) compared to group B (86.67%; P=0.021). Survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis was higher in group B (P=0.021). Complications were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: Short-term results of BANG in low-flow AHO regions show enhanced success compared to those in high-flow AHO regions. This study suggests that trabecular cutting minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (like BANG) may be performed in baseline low-flow AHO regions (temporal quadrant) instead of the high-flow AHO (nasal quadrant) regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在POAG高、低房水流出区的水血管造影引导下弯曲Ab针阴道切除术:一项先导随机对照试验。
应用:小梁切割微创青光眼手术,如弯腹针间角骨切除术(BANG),当基线水血管造影确定低房水流出区时,可以更成功地降低眼压。目的:探讨经水血管造影(AA)测定原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者房水高流出区与低流出区房水高流出区之间的差异,探讨弯针式骨切除术(BANG)的疗效。方法:一项前瞻性、单中心、先导、随机对照试验,招募30例POAG合并显著性白内障(45-80岁)患者的30只眼,随机分为两组(A组:在高流区行BANG, B组:在低流区行BANG),每组15只。使用吲哚菁绿染料(0.1%)进行AA,以确定who途径的基线高流量和低流量区域,然后根据随机化在这些相应区域进行BANG。术前和术后6个月的IOP数据、抗青光眼药物(AGMs)数量和任何并发症记录。总体成功被定义为在随访6个月时,有agm(合格成功)或无agm(完全成功)的IOP≤15mm Hg和≥6mm Hg。结果:在所有30例患者中,AA均显示鼻象限的ho通路高流区和颞象限的ho通路低流区。两组人口构成具有可比性[A组年龄:65.3±6.48岁,男女比(14:1);B组年龄:64.6±7.08岁,男女比(13:2)]。A组术前平均IOPs(17.27±3.43 mm Hg);B组(17.60±5.42 mm Hg) (P=0.842),术后6个月平均IOP [A组(15.6±4.98 mm Hg)];B组(13.13±2.29 mm Hg)差异无统计学意义(P=0.09)。但A组的合格率(40.00%)低于B组(86.67%);P = 0.021)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示B组生存率较高(P=0.021)。两组并发症具有可比性。结论:与高流量地区相比,低流量地区BANG的短期结果显示出更高的成功率。本研究表明,小梁切割微创青光眼手术(如BANG)可以在基线低流量的who区域(颞象限)进行,而不是在高流量的who区域(鼻象限)进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
CYP3A4 Poor and Intermediate Metabolizers Have a Higher Rate of Steroid-Induced Intraocular Pressure Response. Evidence of Mitophagy in Lens Capsule Epithelial Cells of Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. Long-term Visual Acuity Outcomes of Deep Sclerectomy in Pediatric Glaucoma. Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening Using imo: A Portable Head Mounted Perimeter With 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma With Central Visual Field Defects. Identification of Retinal Amyloid-Beta in Ex Vivo Human Glaucoma Eyes Using a Novel Ocular Tracer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1