Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Based on Proteomic Profiling.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JIR.S494191
Zihe Zhao, Taicai Chen, Qingyuan Liu, Jianhang Hu, Tong Ling, Yuanhao Tong, Yuexue Han, Zhengyang Zhu, Jianfeng Duan, Yi Jin, Dongsheng Fu, Yuzhu Wang, Chaohui Pan, Reyaguli Keyoumu, Lili Sun, Wendong Li, Xia Gao, Yinghuan Shi, Huan Dou, Zhao Liu
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Based on Proteomic Profiling.","authors":"Zihe Zhao, Taicai Chen, Qingyuan Liu, Jianhang Hu, Tong Ling, Yuanhao Tong, Yuexue Han, Zhengyang Zhu, Jianfeng Duan, Yi Jin, Dongsheng Fu, Yuzhu Wang, Chaohui Pan, Reyaguli Keyoumu, Lili Sun, Wendong Li, Xia Gao, Yinghuan Shi, Huan Dou, Zhao Liu","doi":"10.2147/JIR.S494191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD), a critical aortic disease, has exhibited stable mortality rates over the past decade. However, diagnostic approaches for TBAD during routine health check-ups are currently lacking. This study focused on developing a model to improve the diagnosis in a population.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Serum biomarkers were investigated in 88 participants using proteomic profiling combined with machine learning. The findings were validated using ELISA in other 80 participants. Subsequently, a diagnostic model for TBAD integrating biomarkers with clinical indicators was developed and assessed using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified through proteomic profiling and machine learning in discovery and derivation cohorts. Five of these (GDF-15, IL6, CD58, LY9, and Siglec-7) were further verified through ELISA validation within the validation cohort. In addition, ten blood-related indicators were selected as clinical indicators. Combining biomarkers and clinical indicators, the machine learning-based models performed well (AUC of the biomarker model = 0.865, AUC of the clinical model = 0.904, and AUC of the combined model = 0.909) using relative quantitation. The performance of the three models was verified (AUC of biomarker model = 0.866, AUC of clinical model = 0.868, and AUC of combined model = 0.886) using absolute quantitation. Crucially, the combined models outperformed individual biomarkers and clinical models, demonstrating superior efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using proteomic profiling, we identified serum IL-6, GDF-15, CD58, LY9, and Siglec-7 as TBAD biomarkers. The machine-learning-based diagnostic model exhibited significant potential for TBAD diagnosis using only blood samples within the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inflammation Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"533-547"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S494191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD), a critical aortic disease, has exhibited stable mortality rates over the past decade. However, diagnostic approaches for TBAD during routine health check-ups are currently lacking. This study focused on developing a model to improve the diagnosis in a population.

Patients and methods: Serum biomarkers were investigated in 88 participants using proteomic profiling combined with machine learning. The findings were validated using ELISA in other 80 participants. Subsequently, a diagnostic model for TBAD integrating biomarkers with clinical indicators was developed and assessed using machine learning.

Results: Six differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified through proteomic profiling and machine learning in discovery and derivation cohorts. Five of these (GDF-15, IL6, CD58, LY9, and Siglec-7) were further verified through ELISA validation within the validation cohort. In addition, ten blood-related indicators were selected as clinical indicators. Combining biomarkers and clinical indicators, the machine learning-based models performed well (AUC of the biomarker model = 0.865, AUC of the clinical model = 0.904, and AUC of the combined model = 0.909) using relative quantitation. The performance of the three models was verified (AUC of biomarker model = 0.866, AUC of clinical model = 0.868, and AUC of combined model = 0.886) using absolute quantitation. Crucially, the combined models outperformed individual biomarkers and clinical models, demonstrating superior efficacy.

Conclusion: Using proteomic profiling, we identified serum IL-6, GDF-15, CD58, LY9, and Siglec-7 as TBAD biomarkers. The machine-learning-based diagnostic model exhibited significant potential for TBAD diagnosis using only blood samples within the population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于蛋白质组学分析的Stanford B型主动脉夹层诊断模型的建立与验证。
目的:斯坦福B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)是一种严重的主动脉疾病,在过去的十年中表现出稳定的死亡率。然而,目前缺乏常规健康检查中TBAD的诊断方法。这项研究的重点是建立一个模型,以提高人群的诊断。患者和方法:使用结合机器学习的蛋白质组学分析研究了88名参与者的血清生物标志物。在其他80名参与者中使用ELISA验证了这些发现。随后,研究人员开发了一种结合生物标志物和临床指标的TBAD诊断模型,并使用机器学习对其进行了评估。结果:通过蛋白质组学分析和机器学习在发现和推导队列中鉴定出6种差异表达蛋白(DEPs)。其中5个(GDF-15、IL6、CD58、LY9和siglece -7)在验证队列中通过ELISA验证进一步验证。另外,选取10项血液相关指标作为临床指标。结合生物标志物和临床指标,机器学习模型的相对定量表现良好(生物标志物模型的AUC = 0.865,临床模型的AUC = 0.904,联合模型的AUC = 0.909)。采用绝对定量法验证三种模型的性能(生物标志物模型的AUC = 0.866,临床模型的AUC = 0.868,联合模型的AUC = 0.886)。至关重要的是,联合模型优于个体生物标志物和临床模型,显示出优越的疗效。结论:通过蛋白质组学分析,我们确定了血清IL-6、GDF-15、CD58、LY9和siglece -7是TBAD的生物标志物。基于机器学习的诊断模型仅使用人群中的血液样本就显示出TBAD诊断的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inflammation Research
Journal of Inflammation Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
658
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings on the molecular basis, cell biology and pharmacology of inflammation.
期刊最新文献
Quzhou Aurantii Fructus Flavonoids Ameliorate Inflammatory Responses, Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in DSS-Induced Colitis by Modulating PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway and Gut Microbiome. Rat Model of Cystic Neutrophilic Granulomatous Mastitis by Corynebacterium Kroppenstedtii. RECK as a Potential Crucial Molecule for the Targeted Treatment of Sepsis. Role of Aging in Ulcerative Colitis Pathogenesis: A Focus on ETS1 as a Promising Biomarker. Elucidating the Role of HIF-1α/YAP Signaling Pathway in Regulating Inflammation in Human Periodontal Stem Cells: An in vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1