Machine Learning in Optimising Nursing Care Delivery Models: An Empirical Analysis of Hospital Wards

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1111/jep.70001
Manar Aslan, Ergin Toros
{"title":"Machine Learning in Optimising Nursing Care Delivery Models: An Empirical Analysis of Hospital Wards","authors":"Manar Aslan,&nbsp;Ergin Toros","doi":"10.1111/jep.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the performance of machine learning (ML) techniques in optimising nurse staffing and evaluating the appropriateness of nursing care delivery models in hospital wards. The primary outcome measures include the adequacy of nurse staffing and the appropriateness of the nursing care delivery system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Historical and current healthcare challenges, such as nurse shortages and increasing patient acuity, necessitate innovative approaches to nursing care delivery. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for flexible and scalable staffing models to manage surges in patient volume and acuity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive study was conducted in 39 inpatient wards across a university hospital and three state hospitals, involving 117 ward-level observations. Data were collected using the Rush Medicus Patient Classification Scale and analysed using k-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression algorithms. Effectiveness was measured by the accuracy of machine learning predictions regarding nurse staffing adequacy, while suitability was determined by the congruence between observed nursing care models and patient needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>STROBE checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting both nurse staffing adequacy and the appropriateness of nursing care delivery systems. The study found that 68.4% of wards had sufficient nurse staffing and 26.5% of wards used appropriate care delivery models, with functional nursing and total patient care models being the most commonly used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights functional nursing and total patient care models, emphasising the need to consider nurse qualifications and patient needs in selecting care systems. Machine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proved effective in aligning staffing with patient requirements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proves effective in optimising nursing care delivery models, suggesting significant potential for enhancing patient care and nurse satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The research underscores machine learning's role in improving nursing care delivery, aligning nurse staffing with patient needs, and advancing healthcare outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>The findings advocate for integrating machine learning in the planning of nursing care delivery models. This study sets a precedent for using data-driven approaches to improve nurse staffing and care delivery, potentially enhancing global clinical outcomes and operational efficiencies. The global clinical community can learn from this study the value of employing machine learning techniques to make informed, evidence-based decisions in healthcare management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>While the study lacked direct patient involvement, its goal was to enhance patient care and healthcare efficiency. Future research will aim to incorporate patient and public insights more directly.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to assess the performance of machine learning (ML) techniques in optimising nurse staffing and evaluating the appropriateness of nursing care delivery models in hospital wards. The primary outcome measures include the adequacy of nurse staffing and the appropriateness of the nursing care delivery system.

Background

Historical and current healthcare challenges, such as nurse shortages and increasing patient acuity, necessitate innovative approaches to nursing care delivery. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for flexible and scalable staffing models to manage surges in patient volume and acuity.

Materials and Methods

A descriptive study was conducted in 39 inpatient wards across a university hospital and three state hospitals, involving 117 ward-level observations. Data were collected using the Rush Medicus Patient Classification Scale and analysed using k-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression algorithms. Effectiveness was measured by the accuracy of machine learning predictions regarding nurse staffing adequacy, while suitability was determined by the congruence between observed nursing care models and patient needs.

Reporting Method

STROBE checklist.

Results

The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting both nurse staffing adequacy and the appropriateness of nursing care delivery systems. The study found that 68.4% of wards had sufficient nurse staffing and 26.5% of wards used appropriate care delivery models, with functional nursing and total patient care models being the most commonly used.

Discussion

The study highlights functional nursing and total patient care models, emphasising the need to consider nurse qualifications and patient needs in selecting care systems. Machine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proved effective in aligning staffing with patient requirements.

Conclusion

Machine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proves effective in optimising nursing care delivery models, suggesting significant potential for enhancing patient care and nurse satisfaction.

Implications

The research underscores machine learning's role in improving nursing care delivery, aligning nurse staffing with patient needs, and advancing healthcare outcomes.

Impact

The findings advocate for integrating machine learning in the planning of nursing care delivery models. This study sets a precedent for using data-driven approaches to improve nurse staffing and care delivery, potentially enhancing global clinical outcomes and operational efficiencies. The global clinical community can learn from this study the value of employing machine learning techniques to make informed, evidence-based decisions in healthcare management.

Patient or Public Contribution

While the study lacked direct patient involvement, its goal was to enhance patient care and healthcare efficiency. Future research will aim to incorporate patient and public insights more directly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化护理服务模式中的机器学习:医院病房的实证分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估机器学习(ML)技术在优化护士配置和评估医院病房护理服务模式的适当性方面的表现。主要结果措施包括护士人员配备的充分性和护理服务系统的适当性。背景:历史和当前的医疗保健挑战,如护士短缺和患者的日益敏锐,需要创新的护理方法。例如,2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了灵活和可扩展的人员配备模式的必要性,以应对患者数量和敏锐度的激增。材料和方法:在一所大学医院和三所州立医院的39个住院病房进行了一项描述性研究,涉及117个病房水平的观察。使用Rush Medicus患者分类量表收集数据,并使用k近邻、支持向量机、随机森林和逻辑回归算法进行分析。有效性是通过机器学习预测护士人员配备充分性的准确性来衡量的,而适用性是通过观察到的护理模式和患者需求之间的一致性来确定的。报告方式:STROBE核对表。结果:随机森林算法在预测护士人员配备充足性和护理服务系统的适当性方面表现出最高的准确性。研究发现68.4%的病房配备了足够的护士,26.5%的病房使用了适当的护理模式,其中功能护理和全面病人护理模式是最常用的。讨论:该研究强调功能护理和全面病人护理模式,强调在选择护理系统时需要考虑护士资格和病人需求。事实证明,机器学习,尤其是随机森林算法,在调整人员配备与患者需求方面是有效的。结论:机器学习,特别是随机森林算法,在优化护理交付模型方面被证明是有效的,这表明在提高患者护理和护士满意度方面具有巨大的潜力。启示:该研究强调了机器学习在改善护理服务、使护士人员配备与患者需求保持一致以及提高医疗保健结果方面的作用。影响:研究结果提倡将机器学习整合到护理服务模式的规划中。该研究开创了使用数据驱动方法改善护士人员配置和护理服务的先例,有可能提高全球临床结果和运营效率。全球临床社区可以从这项研究中学习到使用机器学习技术在医疗保健管理中做出明智的、基于证据的决策的价值。患者或公众贡献:虽然该研究缺乏患者的直接参与,但其目标是提高患者护理和医疗保健效率。未来的研究将旨在更直接地结合患者和公众的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Examining a Holistic Framework for Evaluating Clinical Outcomes in Parallel With Non-Clinical Outcomes The Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Stress Scale for Siblings of Childhood Cancer Patients 'I'm Not Sure Who to Refer You to': Experiences of Clinicians Accessing Allied Health for Their Patients With Parkinson's Disease Correction to “Reassurance for Patients—Essential Not Optional” The Effect of Out-of-Hospital Extended Care on the Prognosis of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1