Ablation of slow activation areas in addition to pulmonary vein isolation improves the maintenance of the sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s10840-025-01992-2
Li Shu, Zhen Yuan, Yi Lu, Shenghui Ma, Chunhui Liu, Zhejun Cai
{"title":"Ablation of slow activation areas in addition to pulmonary vein isolation improves the maintenance of the sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Li Shu, Zhen Yuan, Yi Lu, Shenghui Ma, Chunhui Liu, Zhejun Cai","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-01992-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Slow activation areas, characterized by decreased conduction velocities in the left atrium, are commonly observed in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, it remains unclear whether the ablation of slow activation areas combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves clinical outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent catheter ablation for PeAF. A total of 78 consecutive patients were included in the PVI + SAA group, while another 78 patients who underwent PVI with/without the roof line, matched 1:1 by propensity score, served as the control group. Slow activation area was defined as ≥ 4 10 ms-step isochrones within 10 mm distance. The endpoint was AF recurrence, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (AT) lasting > 30 s after the blanking period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean mapping time was 10 ± 3 min in the PVI + SAA group. Slow activation areas were identified in 37 of the 78 patients, predominantly located in the anterior wall and often overlapping with the low-voltage areas. The proportion of atrial arrhythmia-free patients was significantly higher in the PVI + SAA group compared to the PVI group (Log-rank P = 0.024; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.85). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in AT/AF recurrence rates between patients who underwent additional ablation of slow activation area and those without identified slow activation areas in the PVI + SAA group (Log-rank P = 0.73; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.42-3.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Slow activation areas can be efficiently identified using isochronal mapping. Targeted ablation of slow activation areas helps reduce AT/AF recurrence in patients with PeAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-01992-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Slow activation areas, characterized by decreased conduction velocities in the left atrium, are commonly observed in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, it remains unclear whether the ablation of slow activation areas combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent catheter ablation for PeAF. A total of 78 consecutive patients were included in the PVI + SAA group, while another 78 patients who underwent PVI with/without the roof line, matched 1:1 by propensity score, served as the control group. Slow activation area was defined as ≥ 4 10 ms-step isochrones within 10 mm distance. The endpoint was AF recurrence, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (AT) lasting > 30 s after the blanking period.

Results: The mean mapping time was 10 ± 3 min in the PVI + SAA group. Slow activation areas were identified in 37 of the 78 patients, predominantly located in the anterior wall and often overlapping with the low-voltage areas. The proportion of atrial arrhythmia-free patients was significantly higher in the PVI + SAA group compared to the PVI group (Log-rank P = 0.024; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.85). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in AT/AF recurrence rates between patients who underwent additional ablation of slow activation area and those without identified slow activation areas in the PVI + SAA group (Log-rank P = 0.73; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.42-3.42).

Conclusions: Slow activation areas can be efficiently identified using isochronal mapping. Targeted ablation of slow activation areas helps reduce AT/AF recurrence in patients with PeAF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除肺静脉隔离外,消融慢活化区可改善持续性房颤患者窦性心律的维持。
背景:以左心房传导速度降低为特征的慢激活区常见于持续性心房颤动(PeAF)患者。然而,目前尚不清楚慢激活区消融联合肺静脉隔离(PVI)是否能改善这些患者的临床结果。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了因PeAF接受导管消融治疗的患者。连续78例患者被纳入PVI + SAA组,另外78例患者接受了有/没有顶线的PVI,倾向评分1:1匹配作为对照组。慢激活区定义为10 mm距离内≥4个10 ms步长等时线。终点为AF复发、心房扑动或房性心动过速(AT),停药期后持续bbbb30 s。结果:PVI + SAA组平均作图时间为10±3 min。78例患者中有37例发现慢激活区,主要位于前壁,经常与低压区重叠。PVI + SAA组无房性心律失常患者比例显著高于PVI组(Log-rank P = 0.024;风险比[HR]: 0.40;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.19-0.85)。亚组分析显示,在PVI + SAA组中,额外消融慢活化区与未识别慢活化区患者的AT/AF复发率无显著差异(Log-rank P = 0.73;人力资源:1.20;95% ci: 0.42-3.42)。结论:慢激活区可通过等时作图有效识别。靶向消融慢激活区有助于减少PeAF患者AT/AF复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
期刊最新文献
Impact of left atrial myopathy and post-ablation remodeling on quality of life: a DECAAF II sub-analysis. Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients. Non-invasive prediction of atrial cardiomyopathy characterized by multipolar high-density contact mapping. Pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation in the setting of pulmonary vein stents: a case report. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing atrioventricular junction ablation: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1