A New Short-Term Assessment Condition for Evaluating Nonfunctional Electromyographic Activity of Masseter Muscle During Wakefulness.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1111/joor.13942
Suvichaya Angkulmahasuk, Akira Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Ishiyama, Kenji Fueki
{"title":"A New Short-Term Assessment Condition for Evaluating Nonfunctional Electromyographic Activity of Masseter Muscle During Wakefulness.","authors":"Suvichaya Angkulmahasuk, Akira Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Ishiyama, Kenji Fueki","doi":"10.1111/joor.13942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Awake bruxism involves masticatory muscle activity during wakefulness, potentially leading to clinical concerns. Accurate electromyography (EMG) assessment is challenging with brief durations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish a reliable, short-term measure for nonfunctional masseter muscle activity during wakefulness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four healthy participants completed the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and were assessed with an EMG logger (FLA-500-SD) across three sessions. On Day 1, participants performed four tasks (reading, bead-grabbing, video watching and math) for 15 min each in random order. On Day 2, scheduled at least 1 week later, tasks were repeated in a different sequence. On Day 3, participants underwent a 7-h continuous EMG recording during daily activities while maintaining activity diaries. Main outcomes included the mean number of EMG bursts per hour, burst duration, burst peak value relative to maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) and integral value (μV.s, %MVC.s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (mean age: 28.0 ± 3.1) scored low on AB likelihood per partial OBC results, contrasting with EMG activity levels. Significant differences in EMG parameters were noted across tasks, with consistent values between Days 1 and 2. The reading, video, and math tasks showed strongest correlations with long-term EMG measurements (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.62-0.66, p < 0.001). Reading task demonstrated high test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.9), with the highest specificity (100%) and positive predictive value, though sensitivity was limited compared with long-term AB measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMG measurements during a 15-min reading task may correspond to prolonged monitoring, suggesting the potential for short-task EMG assessments in practice. Integrating such assessments might enhance diagnostic accuracy, although judgement remains essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Awake bruxism involves masticatory muscle activity during wakefulness, potentially leading to clinical concerns. Accurate electromyography (EMG) assessment is challenging with brief durations.

Objective: To establish a reliable, short-term measure for nonfunctional masseter muscle activity during wakefulness.

Methods: Thirty-four healthy participants completed the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and were assessed with an EMG logger (FLA-500-SD) across three sessions. On Day 1, participants performed four tasks (reading, bead-grabbing, video watching and math) for 15 min each in random order. On Day 2, scheduled at least 1 week later, tasks were repeated in a different sequence. On Day 3, participants underwent a 7-h continuous EMG recording during daily activities while maintaining activity diaries. Main outcomes included the mean number of EMG bursts per hour, burst duration, burst peak value relative to maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) and integral value (μV.s, %MVC.s).

Results: Participants (mean age: 28.0 ± 3.1) scored low on AB likelihood per partial OBC results, contrasting with EMG activity levels. Significant differences in EMG parameters were noted across tasks, with consistent values between Days 1 and 2. The reading, video, and math tasks showed strongest correlations with long-term EMG measurements (rs = 0.62-0.66, p < 0.001). Reading task demonstrated high test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.9), with the highest specificity (100%) and positive predictive value, though sensitivity was limited compared with long-term AB measures.

Conclusions: EMG measurements during a 15-min reading task may correspond to prolonged monitoring, suggesting the potential for short-task EMG assessments in practice. Integrating such assessments might enhance diagnostic accuracy, although judgement remains essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估咬肌清醒时非功能性肌电活动的新短期评估条件。
背景:清醒磨牙症涉及咀嚼肌在清醒时的活动,可能导致临床关注。准确的肌电图(EMG)评估是具有挑战性的短持续时间。目的:建立一种可靠的、短期测量清醒时咬肌非功能性活动的方法。方法:34名健康参与者完成了口腔行为检查表(OBC),并在三个疗程中使用肌电记录仪(FLA-500-SD)进行评估。第一天,参与者按随机顺序完成四项任务(阅读、抓脑袋、看视频和数学),每项任务15分钟。在第2天,至少1周后,以不同的顺序重复任务。在第3天,参与者在保持活动日记的同时,在日常活动中连续记录7小时的肌电图。主要观察结果包括每小时平均肌电脉冲数、脉冲持续时间、脉冲峰值相对于最大自主收缩量(%MVC)和积分值(μV)。年代,% MVC.s)。结果:与肌电活动水平相比,参与者(平均年龄:28.0±3.1)在每部分OBC结果中AB可能性得分较低。不同任务的肌电图参数有显著差异,第1天和第2天的值一致。阅读、视频和数学任务显示与长期肌电图测量的相关性最强(rs = 0.62-0.66, p 0.9),具有最高的特异性(100%)和阳性预测值,尽管与长期AB测量相比敏感性有限。结论:15分钟阅读任务期间的肌电图测量可能对应于长时间的监测,这表明在实践中有可能进行短任务肌电图评估。综合这些评估可能会提高诊断的准确性,尽管判断仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
期刊最新文献
Association of Skeletal Facial Pattern With Treatment Response of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Using Mandibular Advancement Devices - A Cluster Analysis. Normalcy of Swallowing in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Particle Therapy Supported by Combined Swallowing Training and Feeding Management: A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Preferred Chewing Side in Partially Edentulous Patients Is More Related to Residual Dentition Than Hemispheric Laterality. Importance of Pain Drawing Profiles and Their Association With Pain Intensity/Interference and Clinical TMD Diagnoses Among Tertiary Care TMD Pain Patients. Masticatory Performance Within a Representative Swiss Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1