Giae Yun, Jinyeong Yi, Sangyub Han, Jihyeon Seong, Enver Menadjiev, Hyunkyung Han, Jaesik Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sejoong Kim
{"title":"Validation of an acute kidney injury prediction model as a clinical decision support system.","authors":"Giae Yun, Jinyeong Yi, Sangyub Han, Jihyeon Seong, Enver Menadjiev, Hyunkyung Han, Jaesik Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sejoong Kim","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.24.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical clinical condition that requires immediate intervention. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model called PRIME Solution to predict AKI and evaluated its ability to enhance clinicians' predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRIME Solution was developed using convolutional neural networks with residual blocks on 183,221 inpatient admissions from a tertiary hospital (2013-2017) and externally validated with 4,501 admissions at another tertiary hospital (2020-2021). To assess its application, we conducted a prospective evaluation using retrospectively collected data from 100 patients at the latter hospital, including 15 AKI cases. AKI prediction performance was compared among specialists, physicians, and medical students, both with and without AI assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without assistance, specialists demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.797), followed by medical students (0.619) and the PRIME Solution (0.568). AI assistance improved overall recall (61.0% to 74.0%) and F1 scores (38.7% to 42.0%), while reducing average review time (73.8 to 65.4 seconds, p < 0.001). However, the impact varied across expertise levels. Specialists showed the greatest improvement (recall, 32.1% to 64.3%; F1, 36.4% to 48.6%), whereas medical students' performance improved but aligned more closely with the AI model. Additionally, the effect of AI assistance varied by prediction outcome, showing greater improvement in recall for cases predicted as AKI, and better precision, F1 score, and review time reduction (73.4 to 62.1 seconds, p < 0.001) for cases predicted as non-AKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AKI predictions were enhanced by AI assistance, but the improvements varied according to the expertise of the user.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.24.163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical clinical condition that requires immediate intervention. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model called PRIME Solution to predict AKI and evaluated its ability to enhance clinicians' predictions.
Methods: The PRIME Solution was developed using convolutional neural networks with residual blocks on 183,221 inpatient admissions from a tertiary hospital (2013-2017) and externally validated with 4,501 admissions at another tertiary hospital (2020-2021). To assess its application, we conducted a prospective evaluation using retrospectively collected data from 100 patients at the latter hospital, including 15 AKI cases. AKI prediction performance was compared among specialists, physicians, and medical students, both with and without AI assistance.
Results: Without assistance, specialists demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.797), followed by medical students (0.619) and the PRIME Solution (0.568). AI assistance improved overall recall (61.0% to 74.0%) and F1 scores (38.7% to 42.0%), while reducing average review time (73.8 to 65.4 seconds, p < 0.001). However, the impact varied across expertise levels. Specialists showed the greatest improvement (recall, 32.1% to 64.3%; F1, 36.4% to 48.6%), whereas medical students' performance improved but aligned more closely with the AI model. Additionally, the effect of AI assistance varied by prediction outcome, showing greater improvement in recall for cases predicted as AKI, and better precision, F1 score, and review time reduction (73.4 to 62.1 seconds, p < 0.001) for cases predicted as non-AKI.
Conclusion: AKI predictions were enhanced by AI assistance, but the improvements varied according to the expertise of the user.
期刊介绍:
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.