Joseph Jon Yin Wan, Yong Yao Tan, Justin Rui Xin Ker, Shree Kumar Dinesh
{"title":"Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Joseph Jon Yin Wan, Yong Yao Tan, Justin Rui Xin Ker, Shree Kumar Dinesh","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 4","pages":"653-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.
Methods: Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.
Results: Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.
Conclusions: Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.