Clinical SANTI classification of arthrogenic muscle inhibition has an excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in preoperative and post-operative anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1002/ksa.12586
Alexandre Le Guen, Emilie Bérard, Hasnae Ben-Roummane, Kévin Lacaze, Thomas Richaud, Bertrand Sonnery Cottet, Etienne Cavaignac
{"title":"Clinical SANTI classification of arthrogenic muscle inhibition has an excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in preoperative and post-operative anterior cruciate ligament rupture.","authors":"Alexandre Le Guen, Emilie Bérard, Hasnae Ben-Roummane, Kévin Lacaze, Thomas Richaud, Bertrand Sonnery Cottet, Etienne Cavaignac","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a reflexive shutdown of the quadriceps muscles following a knee injury or surgery that presents with or without hamstring contracture. This complication can be classified according to the SANTI classification, but the reproducibility of this clinical classification has not yet been demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre longitudinal observational study included 140 patients who were within 6 weeks of an ACL rupture. The presence of AMI was assessed separately and blindly during the preoperative consultation and at 3 weeks post-operative by an Orthopaedic Surgeon, an Orthopaedic Resident, a Sports Medicine Physician and a Physiotherapist. AMI was also assessed a second time by the physiotherapist, 10 days after the first assessment, before and after reconstruction surgery, in order to measure intra-rater reliability. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the AMI classification was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement for the AMI classification between different examiners was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.99 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.99-0.99]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.98-0.99]). Agreement in the AMI classification, when determined repeatedly by the same assessor (physiotherapist), was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.94]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.99]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the AMI classification system was found in patients with recent ACL rupture and post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, diagnostic study prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a reflexive shutdown of the quadriceps muscles following a knee injury or surgery that presents with or without hamstring contracture. This complication can be classified according to the SANTI classification, but the reproducibility of this clinical classification has not yet been demonstrated.

Methods: This single-centre longitudinal observational study included 140 patients who were within 6 weeks of an ACL rupture. The presence of AMI was assessed separately and blindly during the preoperative consultation and at 3 weeks post-operative by an Orthopaedic Surgeon, an Orthopaedic Resident, a Sports Medicine Physician and a Physiotherapist. AMI was also assessed a second time by the physiotherapist, 10 days after the first assessment, before and after reconstruction surgery, in order to measure intra-rater reliability. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the AMI classification was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: Agreement for the AMI classification between different examiners was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.99 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.99-0.99]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.98-0.99]). Agreement in the AMI classification, when determined repeatedly by the same assessor (physiotherapist), was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.94]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.99]).

Conclusion: Excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the AMI classification system was found in patients with recent ACL rupture and post-operatively.

Level of evidence: Level II, diagnostic study prospective cohort study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节源性肌肉抑制的临床SANTI分类在术前和术后前交叉韧带断裂中具有良好的组间和组内可靠性。
目的:关节源性肌肉抑制(AMI)是膝关节损伤或手术后出现或不出现腘绳肌挛缩的股四头肌反射性关闭。这种并发症可以根据SANTI分类进行分类,但这种临床分类的可重复性尚未得到证实。方法:这项单中心纵向观察研究包括140例前交叉韧带破裂后6周内的患者。在术前咨询和术后3周由骨科医生、骨科住院医师、运动医学医师和物理治疗师分别盲目评估AMI的存在。在第一次评估后10天,重建手术前后,物理治疗师还对AMI进行了第二次评估,以测量评分内可靠性。通过计算类内相关系数(ICC)确定AMI分类的类间和类内信度。结果:术前(ICC = 0.99[95%可信区间,CI: 0.99-0.99])和术后(ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.98-0.99])不同检查人员对AMI分类的一致性非常好。当由同一评估者(物理治疗师)反复确定AMI分类时,术前(ICC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.94])和术后(ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.99]) AMI分类的一致性非常好。结论:AMI分类系统在近期前交叉韧带破裂患者及术后均具有良好的评分内和评分间可靠性。证据等级:II级,诊断性研究前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
418
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication. The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance. Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards. Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
期刊最新文献
Combined use of cleft and truncated triangle signs helps improve the preoperative MRI diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in patients with ACL injuries. Return to competition after ACL reconstruction: Factors influencing rates and timing in Swedish football players. Improved outcomes of proximal hamstring avulsion surgery in patients both under and over 50 years, with greater gains in the younger group: A matched comparative study of the PHAS cohort. No difference in ACL revision rates between hamstring and patellar tendon autograft in patients with ACL-R and a concurrent meniscal injury irrespective of meniscal treatment. In functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty, femoral component rotation follows the transepicondylar axis to achieve flexion balance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1