Neurocritical Care Rapid Response Team Providing Critical Care Support During Mechanical Thrombectomy of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02199-5
Pouya Tahsili-Fahadan, Jing Wang, Seajin Yi, Yun Fang, Crystal Tulloch, Jackie Leutbecker, Edward Greenberg, Dan Dinescu, Laith R Altaweel
{"title":"Neurocritical Care Rapid Response Team Providing Critical Care Support During Mechanical Thrombectomy of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.","authors":"Pouya Tahsili-Fahadan, Jing Wang, Seajin Yi, Yun Fang, Crystal Tulloch, Jackie Leutbecker, Edward Greenberg, Dan Dinescu, Laith R Altaweel","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02199-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Acute ischemic stroke with medium and large vessel occlusion is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in which timely intervention with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is crucial for restoring cerebral blood flow and improving patient outcomes. Effective analgosedation and hemodynamic management during MT are critical to patient outcomes and typically managed by anesthesia. Because of inconsistent anesthesia support at our institution, we implemented a dedicated neurocritical care rapid response team (NCC-RRT) to manage these aspects of care. The primary outcome of our study was door-to-groin puncture time, before and after the implementation of the NCC-RRT. Secondary outcomes included door-to-recanalization time, patient disposition status, and the need for emergent anesthesia support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We conducted a prospective analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing MT at a comprehensive stroke center between January 2021 and December 2023. The study compared two periods: era 1 (pre-NCC-RRT, January to October 2021) and era 2 (post-NCC-RRT, December 2021 to December 2023). We excluded inpatient stroke alerts and patients intubated at outside hospitals. The NCC-RRT was responsible for the expedited transfer, airway management, procedural analgosedation, and hemodynamic support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 373 patients were included in the study, with 86 patients in era 1 and 287 in era 2. The implementation of the NCC-RRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in median DGP and door-to-recanalization times by 11.7% and 12.6%, respectively. NCC-RRT was also associated with a 21.4% increase in general anesthesia utilization, and no patients required emergent anesthesia support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The introduction of a dedicated NCC-RRT led to substantial improvements in MT process efficiency, highlighting the critical role of neurocritical care in optimizing stroke treatment and enhancing patient outcomes. This model offers an effective alternative for centers where dedicated neuroanesthesia teams are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02199-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Acute ischemic stroke with medium and large vessel occlusion is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in which timely intervention with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is crucial for restoring cerebral blood flow and improving patient outcomes. Effective analgosedation and hemodynamic management during MT are critical to patient outcomes and typically managed by anesthesia. Because of inconsistent anesthesia support at our institution, we implemented a dedicated neurocritical care rapid response team (NCC-RRT) to manage these aspects of care. The primary outcome of our study was door-to-groin puncture time, before and after the implementation of the NCC-RRT. Secondary outcomes included door-to-recanalization time, patient disposition status, and the need for emergent anesthesia support.

Methods:  We conducted a prospective analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing MT at a comprehensive stroke center between January 2021 and December 2023. The study compared two periods: era 1 (pre-NCC-RRT, January to October 2021) and era 2 (post-NCC-RRT, December 2021 to December 2023). We excluded inpatient stroke alerts and patients intubated at outside hospitals. The NCC-RRT was responsible for the expedited transfer, airway management, procedural analgosedation, and hemodynamic support.

Results:  A total of 373 patients were included in the study, with 86 patients in era 1 and 287 in era 2. The implementation of the NCC-RRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in median DGP and door-to-recanalization times by 11.7% and 12.6%, respectively. NCC-RRT was also associated with a 21.4% increase in general anesthesia utilization, and no patients required emergent anesthesia support.

Conclusions:  The introduction of a dedicated NCC-RRT led to substantial improvements in MT process efficiency, highlighting the critical role of neurocritical care in optimizing stroke treatment and enhancing patient outcomes. This model offers an effective alternative for centers where dedicated neuroanesthesia teams are unavailable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经危重症护理快速反应小组在紧急大血管闭塞性卒中机械取栓期间提供危重症护理支持。
背景:急性缺血性卒中合并中、大血管闭塞是发病和死亡的主要原因,及时介入机械取栓(MT)对恢复脑血流和改善患者预后至关重要。MT期间有效的镇痛和血流动力学管理对患者预后至关重要,通常由麻醉管理。由于我们机构麻醉支持不一致,我们实施了一个专门的神经危重症护理快速反应小组(nc - rrt)来管理这些方面的护理。我们研究的主要结果是在实施NCC-RRT之前和之后,从门到腹股沟的穿刺时间。次要结果包括门到再通时间、患者情绪状态和紧急麻醉支持的需要。方法:我们对2021年1月至2023年12月在综合卒中中心接受MT治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者进行了前瞻性分析。该研究比较了两个时期:时代1 (ncc - rrt前,2021年1月至10月)和时代2 (ncc - rrt后,2021年12月至2023年12月)。我们排除了住院中风患者和在医院外插管的患者。NCC-RRT负责快速转移、气道管理、程序性分析镇静和血流动力学支持。结果:共有373例患者纳入研究,其中86例为1期,287例为2期。NCC-RRT的实施与中位DGP和门静脉再通时间分别减少11.7%和12.6%有统计学意义的显著相关。NCC-RRT还与全身麻醉使用率增加21.4%相关,并且没有患者需要紧急麻醉支持。结论:专门的NCC-RRT的引入大大提高了MT过程的效率,突出了神经危重症护理在优化卒中治疗和提高患者预后方面的关键作用。这种模式为没有专门的神经麻醉团队的中心提供了有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care Spiritual Assessment and Goals-of-Care Discussions in the Neurocritical Care Unit: Collaborating with Chaplains. States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination. Does Celecoxib Actually Reduce Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage? Hemoglobin Decrements are Associated with Ischemic Brain Lesions and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1