Huimin Zhang, Shuting Chai, Dawei Shan, Gang Liu, Yan Zhang
{"title":"Combining quantified EEG with clinical measures to better predict outcomes of acute disorders of consciousness.","authors":"Huimin Zhang, Shuting Chai, Dawei Shan, Gang Liu, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2025.103048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application of the neuronal recovery model (i.e., the ABCD model derived from EEG power spectral analysis) in forecasting outcomes for patients with acute disorders of consciousness (DOC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute DOC were enrolled, and clinical assessments, including the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR), and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores, along with electroencephalography (EEG), were documented on the first day post-enrollment. The ABCD model, derived from EEG power spectral data reflecting frequency bands, categorized brain activity into four distinct groups (A, B, C, D). Outcome prognoses were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) six months after enrollment. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the correlation between the ABCD model and clinical assessments, and to investigate the predictive value of EEG and clinical assessments for the long-term prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 patients with acute DOC were included; the median age was 64 years (interquartile range 52, 72), of which 52 patients had favorable outcomes. Significant correlations were observed between the ABCD model and both the FOUR and CRS-R scores. The CRS-R and ABCD model demonstrated relatively good predictive value for six-month prognoses, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.695 and 0.678, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of the CRS-R score and ABCD model exhibited the highest predictive value with an AUC of 0.746.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ABCD model effectively predicted the prognosis of patients with acute DOC in combination with CRS-R.</p>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"55 2","pages":"103048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2025.103048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application of the neuronal recovery model (i.e., the ABCD model derived from EEG power spectral analysis) in forecasting outcomes for patients with acute disorders of consciousness (DOC).
Methods: Patients with acute DOC were enrolled, and clinical assessments, including the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR), and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores, along with electroencephalography (EEG), were documented on the first day post-enrollment. The ABCD model, derived from EEG power spectral data reflecting frequency bands, categorized brain activity into four distinct groups (A, B, C, D). Outcome prognoses were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) six months after enrollment. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the correlation between the ABCD model and clinical assessments, and to investigate the predictive value of EEG and clinical assessments for the long-term prognosis.
Results: A total of 93 patients with acute DOC were included; the median age was 64 years (interquartile range 52, 72), of which 52 patients had favorable outcomes. Significant correlations were observed between the ABCD model and both the FOUR and CRS-R scores. The CRS-R and ABCD model demonstrated relatively good predictive value for six-month prognoses, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.695 and 0.678, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of the CRS-R score and ABCD model exhibited the highest predictive value with an AUC of 0.746.
Conclusions: The ABCD model effectively predicted the prognosis of patients with acute DOC in combination with CRS-R.
目的:探讨神经元恢复模型(即基于脑电功率谱分析的ABCD模型)在急性意识障碍(DOC)患者预后预测中的应用。方法:纳入急性DOC患者,并在入组后第一天记录临床评估,包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、无反应性全大纲(FOUR)和昏迷恢复量表-修订(CRS-R)评分以及脑电图(EEG)。ABCD模型来源于反映频带的脑电图功率谱数据,将脑活动分为四组(A、B、C、D)。入组后6个月,使用格拉斯哥结局量表扩展(GOSE)评估预后。通过统计学分析ABCD模型与临床评价的相关性,探讨脑电图和临床评价对远期预后的预测价值。结果:共纳入93例急性DOC患者;中位年龄为64岁(四分位数范围52,72),其中52例患者预后良好。ABCD模型与FOUR和CRS-R评分之间存在显著相关性。CRS-R和ABCD模型对6个月预后具有较好的预测价值,曲线下面积(Area Under The Curve, AUC)分别为0.695和0.678 (P < 0.05)。此外,CRS-R评分与ABCD模型的组合预测价值最高,AUC为0.746。结论:ABCD模型联合CRS-R可有效预测急性DOC患者的预后。
期刊介绍:
Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.