Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241304754
Lukas Jud, Alexander Berger, Martin Hartmann, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Jakob Ackermann, Sandro F Fucentese
{"title":"Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.","authors":"Lukas Jud, Alexander Berger, Martin Hartmann, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Jakob Ackermann, Sandro F Fucentese","doi":"10.1177/23259671241304754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibiofemoral rotation is an emerging parameter, especially in assessing patellofemoral instability. However, reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality and do not consider the effect of knee flexion during image acquisition.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the differences in tibiofemoral rotation measurements between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 78 knees in 72 patients were included. All patients underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability at our institution and preoperative CT and MRI were available. Tibiofemoral rotation was measured on axial CT and MRI, whereas the respective knee flexion angle (KFA) was measured on sagittal images. Tibiofemoral rotation values in which the tibia was externally rotated to the femur were handled as positive values. Differences between CT and MRI measurements were calculated and the association between KFA and tibiofemoral rotation was evaluated using Pearson correlation and the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tibiofemoral rotation was 8.7°± 5.5° in CT and 4.2°± 6.7° in MRI (<i>P</i> < .001). The mean KFA was 2.4°± 3.1° in CT and 14.9°± 6.4° in MRI (<i>P</i> < .001). The difference in the KFA between CT and MRI moderately correlated with the difference in tibiofemoral rotation between imaging modalities (<i>r</i> = 0.529; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tibiofemoral rotation measurements significantly differed between CT and MRI, with larger values observed in CT. The difference between imaging modalities correlated with the degree of knee flexion during image acquisition. This observation should be considered when assessing tibiofemoral rotation, as current reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23259671241304754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241304754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tibiofemoral rotation is an emerging parameter, especially in assessing patellofemoral instability. However, reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality and do not consider the effect of knee flexion during image acquisition.

Purpose: To analyze the differences in tibiofemoral rotation measurements between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 78 knees in 72 patients were included. All patients underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability at our institution and preoperative CT and MRI were available. Tibiofemoral rotation was measured on axial CT and MRI, whereas the respective knee flexion angle (KFA) was measured on sagittal images. Tibiofemoral rotation values in which the tibia was externally rotated to the femur were handled as positive values. Differences between CT and MRI measurements were calculated and the association between KFA and tibiofemoral rotation was evaluated using Pearson correlation and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The mean tibiofemoral rotation was 8.7°± 5.5° in CT and 4.2°± 6.7° in MRI (P < .001). The mean KFA was 2.4°± 3.1° in CT and 14.9°± 6.4° in MRI (P < .001). The difference in the KFA between CT and MRI moderately correlated with the difference in tibiofemoral rotation between imaging modalities (r = 0.529; P < .001).

Conclusion: Tibiofemoral rotation measurements significantly differed between CT and MRI, with larger values observed in CT. The difference between imaging modalities correlated with the degree of knee flexion during image acquisition. This observation should be considered when assessing tibiofemoral rotation, as current reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髌股不稳定患者的计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像测量胫股旋转的比较。
背景:胫股旋转是一个新兴的参数,尤其是在评估髌股不稳定性时。然而,文献中的参考值对于所使用的成像方式是不一致的,并且没有考虑在图像获取过程中膝关节屈曲的影响。目的:分析计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)测量胫骨股骨旋转的差异。研究设计:横断面研究;证据水平,3。方法:72例患者共78个膝关节。所有患者均在我院接受髌骨不稳手术,术前均行CT和MRI检查。在轴向CT和MRI上测量胫骨股骨旋转,而在矢状面图像上测量膝关节屈曲角(KFA)。将胫骨向外旋转至股骨的胫骨股骨旋转值作为正值处理。计算CT和MRI测量值之间的差异,并使用Pearson相关和Mann-Whitney U检验评估KFA与胫股旋转之间的关联。结果:CT表现为8.7°±5.5°,MRI表现为4.2°±6.7°(P < 0.001)。CT平均KFA为2.4°±3.1°,MRI平均KFA为14.9°±6.4°(P < 0.001)。CT和MRI之间KFA的差异与两种成像方式之间胫股旋转的差异有中度相关性(r = 0.529;P < 0.001)。结论:CT与MRI测量的胫骨股骨旋转值差异显著,CT测量值较大。成像方式的差异与图像采集时膝关节屈曲的程度有关。在评估胫股旋转时应考虑这一观察结果,因为目前文献中的参考值与所使用的成像方式不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Association Between Autograft Choice and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction. Evaluating the Mechanical Axis for Detection of Posterior Tibial Slope Malalignment in ACL-Deficient Knees on Lateral Radiographs. Evaluation of Thigh Muscle Strength in Adolescent Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction. Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Association of Preoperative Cartilage T1ρ Values With Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis 10 Years After Anatomical Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Follow-up of a Previous Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1