Intravenous thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke while receiving a direct oral anticoagulant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1002/phar.4644
Megan Z Roberts, Spencer H Durham, Nathan A Pinner, Jessica A Starr
{"title":"Intravenous thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke while receiving a direct oral anticoagulant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Megan Z Roberts, Spencer H Durham, Nathan A Pinner, Jessica A Starr","doi":"10.1002/phar.4644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent guidelines for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) indicate administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is not firmly established and may be harmful unless certain potential parameters are met. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores safety outcomes and other clinical parameters from the growing number of publications describing patients taking a DOAC who experience an AIS that is treated acutely with IVT alone. Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and PubMed were searched up to January 9, 2024 for studies including adult patients taking a DOAC who experienced an AIS treated with IVT and did not undergo endovascular therapy (EVT), regardless of the use of an anticoagulation reversal agent. Primary safety outcomes evaluated included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage, and in-hospital mortality. A total of 873 patients from 78 studies, primarily case reports or case series of patients receiving dabigatran with or without idarucizumab reversal (n = 340), were included in the review. The rate of sICH during the index hospitalization was 3.3%. Seven high-quality studies with low risk of bias included outcomes for patients on DOAC and comparator groups of either patients not taking an oral anticoagulant (no OAC) or patients taking a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with INR primarily <1.7 at the time of AIS. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of sICH among patients receiving DOAC vs. no OAC (odds ratio [OR] 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.33) or among patients receiving DOAC vs. VKA (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59-1.75). Similar findings of no difference were observed for other safety outcomes. Findings from this study suggest that utilization of IVT as sole recanalization therapy for AIS may be safe in patients taking a DOAC; however, further studies are needed to elucidate specific parameters that differentiate timepoints and variables to ensure safe, optimal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent guidelines for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) indicate administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is not firmly established and may be harmful unless certain potential parameters are met. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores safety outcomes and other clinical parameters from the growing number of publications describing patients taking a DOAC who experience an AIS that is treated acutely with IVT alone. Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and PubMed were searched up to January 9, 2024 for studies including adult patients taking a DOAC who experienced an AIS treated with IVT and did not undergo endovascular therapy (EVT), regardless of the use of an anticoagulation reversal agent. Primary safety outcomes evaluated included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage, and in-hospital mortality. A total of 873 patients from 78 studies, primarily case reports or case series of patients receiving dabigatran with or without idarucizumab reversal (n = 340), were included in the review. The rate of sICH during the index hospitalization was 3.3%. Seven high-quality studies with low risk of bias included outcomes for patients on DOAC and comparator groups of either patients not taking an oral anticoagulant (no OAC) or patients taking a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with INR primarily <1.7 at the time of AIS. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of sICH among patients receiving DOAC vs. no OAC (odds ratio [OR] 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.33) or among patients receiving DOAC vs. VKA (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59-1.75). Similar findings of no difference were observed for other safety outcomes. Findings from this study suggest that utilization of IVT as sole recanalization therapy for AIS may be safe in patients taking a DOAC; however, further studies are needed to elucidate specific parameters that differentiate timepoints and variables to ensure safe, optimal treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中患者同时接受直接口服抗凝剂:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
最近的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)指南指出,在接受直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的患者中静脉溶栓(IVT)的管理尚未牢固确立,除非满足某些潜在参数,否则可能有害。本系统综述和荟萃分析从越来越多的出版物中探讨了安全性结果和其他临床参数,这些出版物描述了服用DOAC的患者经历了急性AIS,仅用IVT治疗。Embase、《国际药物文摘》(International Pharmaceutical Abstracts)和PubMed检索了截至2024年1月9日的研究,包括服用DOAC的成年患者,他们经历了IVT治疗的AIS,而没有接受血管内治疗(EVT),无论是否使用抗凝逆转剂。评估的主要安全性结果包括症状性颅内出血(siich)、任何颅内出血和院内死亡率。来自78项研究的873名患者被纳入本综述,主要是接受达比加群治疗并伴有或不伴有依达鲁珠单抗逆转的患者的病例报告或病例系列(n = 340)。指数住院期间siich发生率为3.3%。7项低偏倚风险的高质量研究纳入了DOAC患者和对照组的结果,对照组包括不服用口服抗凝剂(无OAC)或主要服用INR的维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)的患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Cross-titration from risperidone to clozapine utilizing clozapine serum concentrations: A case report. Intravenous thrombolysis for patients with acute ischemic stroke while receiving a direct oral anticoagulant: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prevalence of prescription medication use that can exacerbate heart failure among US adults with heart failure. Creation and validation of an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) clinical risk scoring tool for select Enterobacterales in non-urinary isolates. Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1