{"title":"Prevalence and comparison of temporomandibular disorders according to axis I in RDC/TMD and DC/TMD: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Merve Çakir, Gül Merve Yalçin Ülker, Özgür Erdoğan","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5938256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) diagnoses according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and to compare the diagnoses according to both guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Clinical examinations of 218 patients with TMD complaints were conducted according to both guidelines. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the frequency of diagnoses and differences between the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with TMD were women and middle-aged. The number of patients in the myofascial pain class was significantly lower for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p=0.045). The number of patients in the disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) category was significantly higher for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p<0.001). Other categories did not exhibit differences between the classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women and middle-aged individuals are more affected by TMDs. Pain-related TMDs were the most common diagnosis, followed by DDWR according to DC/TMD. According to the RDC/TMD classification, myofascial pain, arthralgia, and DDWR were the most commonly observed diagnoses, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the pain-related TMD and DDWR groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5938256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) diagnoses according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and to compare the diagnoses according to both guidelines.
Method and materials: Clinical examinations of 218 patients with TMD complaints were conducted according to both guidelines. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the frequency of diagnoses and differences between the guidelines.
Results: Most patients diagnosed with TMD were women and middle-aged. The number of patients in the myofascial pain class was significantly lower for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p=0.045). The number of patients in the disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) category was significantly higher for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p<0.001). Other categories did not exhibit differences between the classifications.
Conclusion: Women and middle-aged individuals are more affected by TMDs. Pain-related TMDs were the most common diagnosis, followed by DDWR according to DC/TMD. According to the RDC/TMD classification, myofascial pain, arthralgia, and DDWR were the most commonly observed diagnoses, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the pain-related TMD and DDWR groups.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.