Contribution of nebulized budesonide before bronchoscopy, a prospective clinical study.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae196
Guoxin Zhang, Hu Yu, Li Zhang, Xiaoyun Zhao
{"title":"Contribution of nebulized budesonide before bronchoscopy, a prospective clinical study.","authors":"Guoxin Zhang, Hu Yu, Li Zhang, Xiaoyun Zhao","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of adding budesonide to nebulized lidocaine in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FB) under topical anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years, scheduled for FB under topical anaesthesia were randomized into two groups: the combination group received a pre-treatment of 2 ml 1 mg budesonide with 5 ml 2% lidocaine, whilst the lidocaine group received 5 ml 2% lidocaine with 2 ml saline solution, both administered via nebulization. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and percutaneous oxygen saturation were recorded before, during, and 10 min after FB. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FPS-R) were used to evaluate cough severity, discomfort, willingness to accept reoperation, and the operator's satisfaction with patient cooperation. In addition, the duration of the procedure, total lidocaine dosage instilled through the bronchoscope during the procedure, and types of procedures performed were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the lidocaine group, the combination group showed lower maximum systolic and diastolic BP, higher minimum percutaneous oxygen saturation, and lower cough and discomfort severity scores. Operator's satisfaction, as measured via the VAS or FPS-R, was greater in the combination group, which also exhibited shorter procedure times and required lower lidocaine dosages. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of willingness to accept reoperation or types of procedures performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing FB with topical anaesthesia, pre-treatment with a combination of nebulized lidocaine and budesonide is more effective than nebulized lidocaine alone. Key message What is already known on this topic?  Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) with topical anaesthesia remains a common practice in many settings, although it can cause significant discomfort for patients. What this study adds?  Pre-treatment with a combination of nebulized budesonide and lidocaine was more effective and safer than nebulized lidocaine alone for improving patient tolerance during FB. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  In settings where conscious sedation is not feasible, the combined nebulization of lidocaine and budesonide may offer an optimized approach for FB, enhancing patient comfort and procedural efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy of adding budesonide to nebulized lidocaine in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FB) under topical anaesthesia.

Study design: Patients aged ≥18 years, scheduled for FB under topical anaesthesia were randomized into two groups: the combination group received a pre-treatment of 2 ml 1 mg budesonide with 5 ml 2% lidocaine, whilst the lidocaine group received 5 ml 2% lidocaine with 2 ml saline solution, both administered via nebulization. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and percutaneous oxygen saturation were recorded before, during, and 10 min after FB. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FPS-R) were used to evaluate cough severity, discomfort, willingness to accept reoperation, and the operator's satisfaction with patient cooperation. In addition, the duration of the procedure, total lidocaine dosage instilled through the bronchoscope during the procedure, and types of procedures performed were documented.

Results: Compared to the lidocaine group, the combination group showed lower maximum systolic and diastolic BP, higher minimum percutaneous oxygen saturation, and lower cough and discomfort severity scores. Operator's satisfaction, as measured via the VAS or FPS-R, was greater in the combination group, which also exhibited shorter procedure times and required lower lidocaine dosages. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of willingness to accept reoperation or types of procedures performed.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing FB with topical anaesthesia, pre-treatment with a combination of nebulized lidocaine and budesonide is more effective than nebulized lidocaine alone. Key message What is already known on this topic?  Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) with topical anaesthesia remains a common practice in many settings, although it can cause significant discomfort for patients. What this study adds?  Pre-treatment with a combination of nebulized budesonide and lidocaine was more effective and safer than nebulized lidocaine alone for improving patient tolerance during FB. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  In settings where conscious sedation is not feasible, the combined nebulization of lidocaine and budesonide may offer an optimized approach for FB, enhancing patient comfort and procedural efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布地奈德雾化在支气管镜检查前的作用,一项前瞻性临床研究。
目的:本研究评价布地奈德加雾化利多卡因在局部麻醉下行柔性支气管镜检查(FB)患者中的疗效。研究设计:年龄≥18岁,计划在局部麻醉下进行FB的患者随机分为两组:联合组接受2ml 1mg布地奈德+ 5ml 2%利多卡因预处理,而利多卡因组接受5ml 2%利多卡因+ 2ml生理盐水溶液,均通过雾化给药。分别记录FB前、FB中、FB后10min的血压、心率、经皮血氧饱和度。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Wong-Baker FACES疼痛评定量表(FPS-R)评估咳嗽严重程度、不适程度、接受再手术的意愿以及操作者对患者合作的满意度。此外,记录了手术的持续时间,手术期间通过支气管镜灌注的利多卡因总剂量,以及手术的类型。结果:与利多卡因组相比,联合用药组患者最大收缩压和舒张压较低,最小经皮氧饱和度较高,咳嗽和不适严重程度评分较低。通过VAS或FPS-R测量,操作者的满意度在联合组更高,也表现出更短的手术时间和更低的利多卡因剂量。两组患者接受再手术的意愿及手术方式均无显著差异。结论:在局部麻醉的FB患者中,联合雾化利多卡因和布地奈德治疗比单独雾化利多卡因更有效。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?局部麻醉下的柔性支气管镜检查(FB)在许多情况下仍然是一种常见的做法,尽管它会给患者带来明显的不适。这项研究补充了什么?布地奈德联合利多卡因雾化治疗比单独雾化利多卡因更有效、更安全地改善FB患者的耐受性。这项研究将如何影响研究、实践或政策?在意识镇静不可行的情况下,联合雾化利多卡因和布地奈德可能为FB提供优化的方法,提高患者的舒适度和手术效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
Association between sleep duration and depression in adolescents and young adults: a system review of observational studies and a genetic research of Mendelian randomization analysis. Genetically predicted basal metabolic rate and infectious diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. The reduction of medical resident duty hours for the benefit of patient safety. Insights into drug adverse reactions prediction through Mendelian randomization: a review. Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on plasma levels of EETs, arachidonic acids derived lipid mediators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1