Incidental Findings Identified by Prenatal Microarray Analysis and Consensus Reporting Criteria of the Catalan Public Health Network XIGENICS.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1002/pd.6746
Irene Mademont-Soler, Neus Castells-Sarret, Adela Cisneros, Laura Foj, Clara Benavent-Bofill, Mar Xunclà, Marina Viñas-Jornet, Andrea Ros, Natalia Rey, Ignacio Blanco, Ricard López-Ortega, María Obón, Alberto Plaja
{"title":"Incidental Findings Identified by Prenatal Microarray Analysis and Consensus Reporting Criteria of the Catalan Public Health Network XIGENICS.","authors":"Irene Mademont-Soler, Neus Castells-Sarret, Adela Cisneros, Laura Foj, Clara Benavent-Bofill, Mar Xunclà, Marina Viñas-Jornet, Andrea Ros, Natalia Rey, Ignacio Blanco, Ricard López-Ortega, María Obón, Alberto Plaja","doi":"10.1002/pd.6746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) classified as incidental findings (IFs) in prenatal diagnosis and to develop consensus recommendations for standardizing their reporting across six centers within the Catalan public health system (XIGENICS network).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective review of 4219 consecutive prenatal microarrays performed within the network from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, including all referral reasons. To develop consensus recommendations, several discussion meetings were held along with an extensive review of the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 IFs were identified in 68 samples, revealing a detection rate of 1.6%. They included: 5 CNVs associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with complete penetrance, 41 CNVs for neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with incomplete penetrance, 4 disorders that can potentially be prevented or treated, 5 non-childhood onset neurological disorders, 13 X-linked disorders (mainly STS and DMD deletions), and 1 deletion of the SHOX gene. Long-term follow-up revealed that newborns with high penetrance neurosusceptibility CNVs exhibited clinical manifestations more frequently than those with low penetrance CNVs. At the time of reporting, 52 IFs were disclosed, while 17 were not. According to the new consensus criteria, 43 IFs would now be reported, 17 would not, and 9 would depend on parental decision. CNVs consistent with the referral reason were identified in 4% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study represents the largest series rigorously documenting all identified IFs in consecutive pregnancies evaluated by microarray, including both reported and unreported findings. IFs were found at a higher frequency than previously recognized, underscoring the need for specific clinical attention. Comprehensive consensus reporting recommendations were developed to ensure uniformity of criteria, and an ad hoc committee was established to manage complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the frequency of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) classified as incidental findings (IFs) in prenatal diagnosis and to develop consensus recommendations for standardizing their reporting across six centers within the Catalan public health system (XIGENICS network).

Method: A retrospective review of 4219 consecutive prenatal microarrays performed within the network from 2018 to 2023 was conducted, including all referral reasons. To develop consensus recommendations, several discussion meetings were held along with an extensive review of the existing literature.

Results: A total of 69 IFs were identified in 68 samples, revealing a detection rate of 1.6%. They included: 5 CNVs associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with complete penetrance, 41 CNVs for neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital defects with incomplete penetrance, 4 disorders that can potentially be prevented or treated, 5 non-childhood onset neurological disorders, 13 X-linked disorders (mainly STS and DMD deletions), and 1 deletion of the SHOX gene. Long-term follow-up revealed that newborns with high penetrance neurosusceptibility CNVs exhibited clinical manifestations more frequently than those with low penetrance CNVs. At the time of reporting, 52 IFs were disclosed, while 17 were not. According to the new consensus criteria, 43 IFs would now be reported, 17 would not, and 9 would depend on parental decision. CNVs consistent with the referral reason were identified in 4% of cases.

Conclusion: This study represents the largest series rigorously documenting all identified IFs in consecutive pregnancies evaluated by microarray, including both reported and unreported findings. IFs were found at a higher frequency than previously recognized, underscoring the need for specific clinical attention. Comprehensive consensus reporting recommendations were developed to ensure uniformity of criteria, and an ad hoc committee was established to manage complex cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由产前微阵列分析和加泰罗尼亚公共卫生网络XIGENICS的共识报告标准确定的偶然发现。
目的:该研究旨在评估在产前诊断中被归类为偶然发现(if)的致病性拷贝数变异(CNVs)的频率,并为加泰罗尼亚公共卫生系统(XIGENICS网络)内六个中心的报告标准化提出共识建议。方法:回顾性分析2018年至2023年在网络内连续进行的4219例产前微阵列检查,包括所有转诊原因。为了提出协商一致的建议,举行了几次讨论会议,并对现有文献进行了广泛审查。结果:68份样品共检出69个干扰素,检出率为1.6%。它们包括:5个与完全外显率的神经发育障碍和/或先天性缺陷相关的CNVs, 41个与不完全外显率的神经发育障碍和/或先天性缺陷相关的CNVs, 4个可能被预防或治疗的疾病,5个非儿童期发病的神经疾病,13个x连锁疾病(主要是STS和DMD缺失),1个SHOX基因缺失。长期随访发现,高外显率神经易感性CNVs的新生儿比低外显率CNVs的新生儿更容易出现临床表现。截至发稿时,共有52家财务报表被披露,17家未披露。根据新的协商一致标准,现在将报告43个IFs, 17个不报告,9个取决于父母的决定。在4%的病例中发现了与转诊原因一致的CNVs。结论:这项研究代表了最大的系列严格记录所有确定的连续妊娠的微阵列评估的IFs,包括报道和未报道的发现。IFs的发现频率比以前认识到的要高,强调需要特别的临床注意。制定了全面的协商一致报告建议,以确保标准的统一,并设立了一个特设委员会来管理复杂的案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Chromosomal Aberrations in Fetuses With Isolated Persistent Right Umbilical Vein-A Nationwide Study. Advances in Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening for Dominant Monogenic Conditions: A Review of Current Progress and Future Directions in Clinical Implementation. Making Sense of a Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 16 Mosaicism in the Placenta: A Qualitative Study of Pregnant Women's Decision Making. Outcomes of Intrauterine Interventions in Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) Sequence: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 35 Years. Prenatal Diagnosis of Caroli's Disease by Ultrasound and MRI Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1