Perceived barriers and facilitators affecting utilisation of radiation therapy services: Scoping review findings - Patient and department level influences.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110725
Leah Cramp, Tracy Burrows, Yolanda Surjan
{"title":"Perceived barriers and facilitators affecting utilisation of radiation therapy services: Scoping review findings - Patient and department level influences.","authors":"Leah Cramp, Tracy Burrows, Yolanda Surjan","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing evidence supports the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer patients however, it is underutilised. This scoping review aims to synthesise the current literature investigating patient and department level barriers and facilitators influencing the utilisation trends of RT. A systematic search strategy was developed to identify articles dated from 1993 to 2023. Four online databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched using key words. Eligible studies needed to report outcomes related to barriers and facilitators influencing utilisation of RT. Data was extracted and categorised into health professional, patient, and department level influences. The review resulted in 340 included studies with 298 (88 %) studies reporting on patient influences. More than half of these studies (n = 164; 55 %) reported accessibility concerns including distance and travel burden. Patient acceptability was reported in 88 (30 %) studies, patient affordability in 138 (46 %) studies, patient knowledge, and education in 92 (31 %) studies and patient health and demographics in 235 (79 %) studies. Of the department level influence papers (n = 242, 71 %), department availability such as infrastructure, staffing and waitlists were reported in 167 (69 %) papers. Department adequacy, including the quality, reputation and technology suitability of departments was reported in 60 (25 %) papers. Clinical pathway use was reported in 107 (44 %) papers. This scoping review identifies the broad range of patient and department level influences and facilitators affecting the global utilisation of RT. Recognition of such influences reducing access to RT will inform proposed interventions or educational strategies to overcome and address such barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"204 ","pages":"110725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing evidence supports the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer patients however, it is underutilised. This scoping review aims to synthesise the current literature investigating patient and department level barriers and facilitators influencing the utilisation trends of RT. A systematic search strategy was developed to identify articles dated from 1993 to 2023. Four online databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched using key words. Eligible studies needed to report outcomes related to barriers and facilitators influencing utilisation of RT. Data was extracted and categorised into health professional, patient, and department level influences. The review resulted in 340 included studies with 298 (88 %) studies reporting on patient influences. More than half of these studies (n = 164; 55 %) reported accessibility concerns including distance and travel burden. Patient acceptability was reported in 88 (30 %) studies, patient affordability in 138 (46 %) studies, patient knowledge, and education in 92 (31 %) studies and patient health and demographics in 235 (79 %) studies. Of the department level influence papers (n = 242, 71 %), department availability such as infrastructure, staffing and waitlists were reported in 167 (69 %) papers. Department adequacy, including the quality, reputation and technology suitability of departments was reported in 60 (25 %) papers. Clinical pathway use was reported in 107 (44 %) papers. This scoping review identifies the broad range of patient and department level influences and facilitators affecting the global utilisation of RT. Recognition of such influences reducing access to RT will inform proposed interventions or educational strategies to overcome and address such barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响放射治疗服务利用的感知障碍和促进因素:范围审查结果-患者和科室层面的影响。
现有证据支持放射治疗(RT)对癌症患者的益处,然而,它没有得到充分利用。本综述的目的是综合目前的文献,调查影响rt利用趋势的患者和部门层面的障碍和促进因素。我们制定了一个系统的搜索策略,以确定1993年至2023年的文章。使用关键词检索Medline、Embase、Scopus和CINAHL 4个在线数据库。符合条件的研究需要报告与影响rt利用的障碍和促进因素相关的结果。提取数据并将其分为卫生专业人员、患者和部门层面的影响。该综述纳入了340项研究,其中298项(88%)研究报告了患者的影响。超过一半的研究(n = 164;55%)报告了可访问性问题,包括距离和旅行负担。88项(30%)研究报告了患者的可接受性,138项(46%)研究报告了患者的可负担性,92项(31%)研究报告了患者的知识和教育,235项(79%)研究报告了患者的健康和人口统计学。在系级影响论文(n = 242, 71%)中,167篇(69%)论文报告了系级可用性,如基础设施、人员配备和候补名单。60篇(25%)论文报告了部门的充分性,包括部门的质量、声誉和技术适用性。107篇(44%)论文报告了临床路径的使用。这一范围审查确定了影响全球RT利用的患者和科室层面的广泛影响和促进因素。认识到这些影响减少了RT的使用,将为拟议的干预措施或教育战略提供信息,以克服和解决这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Deglutition preservation after swallowing (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT in head and neck cancers: definitive results of a multicenter prospective study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Association of the time of day of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab with tumor control in lung cancer. Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study. Randomized trials: When scientific rigor meets field reality. A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1