Management of patients with venous thromboembolism and a high recurrence risk estimated by the Vienna Prediction Model: a prospective cohort study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649
Hana Šinkovec , Paul A. Kyrle , Lisbeth Eischer , Paul Gressenberger , Thomas Gary , Marianne Brodmann , Georg Heinze , Sabine Eichinger
{"title":"Management of patients with venous thromboembolism and a high recurrence risk estimated by the Vienna Prediction Model: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Hana Šinkovec ,&nbsp;Paul A. Kyrle ,&nbsp;Lisbeth Eischer ,&nbsp;Paul Gressenberger ,&nbsp;Thomas Gary ,&nbsp;Marianne Brodmann ,&nbsp;Georg Heinze ,&nbsp;Sabine Eichinger","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.5% at 1 year for a median of 13.5 months. Their median age was 56 years, and 96% were men. After the VPM risk assessment, 196 patients restarted anticoagulation. While on anticoagulation, none of the patients experienced recurrent VTE, whereas 4 patients had nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (absolute bleeding rate, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5] events per 100 patient-years). Seventy patients were left untreated after VPM risk assessment for various reasons. Among patients not using anticoagulation, 15 had recurrence (absolute recurrence rate, 18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9] events per 100 person-years). According to the extended Kaplan–Meier analysis, the probability of VTE recurrence in patients not on anticoagulation was 10.1% and 17.9% at 6 and 12 months after VPM risk assessment, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anticoagulant therapy is effective and safe in patients with an unprovoked VTE, in whom the VPM had predicted a high risk of recurrent VTE. If these patients are left untreated, the risk of recurrence is high.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 102649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods and Results

We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.5% at 1 year for a median of 13.5 months. Their median age was 56 years, and 96% were men. After the VPM risk assessment, 196 patients restarted anticoagulation. While on anticoagulation, none of the patients experienced recurrent VTE, whereas 4 patients had nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (absolute bleeding rate, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5] events per 100 patient-years). Seventy patients were left untreated after VPM risk assessment for various reasons. Among patients not using anticoagulation, 15 had recurrence (absolute recurrence rate, 18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9] events per 100 person-years). According to the extended Kaplan–Meier analysis, the probability of VTE recurrence in patients not on anticoagulation was 10.1% and 17.9% at 6 and 12 months after VPM risk assessment, respectively.

Conclusion

Anticoagulant therapy is effective and safe in patients with an unprovoked VTE, in whom the VPM had predicted a high risk of recurrent VTE. If these patients are left untreated, the risk of recurrence is high.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维也纳预测模型估计的静脉血栓栓塞和高复发风险患者的管理:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:维也纳预测模型(VPM)确定了首次无诱发性下肢深静脉血栓形成和/或肺栓塞的患者,这些患者复发风险较低,因此可能无法从延长期抗凝中获益。目的:本研究的目的是评估预测复发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)高风险的患者。方法和结果:我们前瞻性随访266例患者,其中VPM预测1年复发风险超过5.5%,中位时间为13.5个月。他们的中位年龄为56岁,96%为男性。在VPM风险评估后,196例患者重新开始抗凝治疗。在抗凝治疗期间,没有患者发生静脉血栓栓塞复发,而4例患者发生非重大临床相关出血(绝对出血率,1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5]事件/ 100患者年)。70例患者因各种原因进行VPM风险评估后未进行治疗。在未使用抗凝治疗的患者中,15例复发(绝对复发率,18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9]事件/ 100人年)。根据扩展Kaplan-Meier分析,未抗凝治疗的VTE患者在VPM风险评估后6个月和12个月的复发率分别为10.1%和17.9%。结论:对于非诱发性静脉血栓栓塞患者,抗凝治疗是有效和安全的,在这些患者中,VPM预测静脉血栓栓塞复发的风险很高。如果这些患者不及时治疗,复发的风险很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Duplication of the prothrombin gene is associated with a significant increase in thrombin generation Direct oral anticoagulants in thrombocytopenic patients with cancer Physiologic clot strength by thromboelastography at extremely low and normal platelet counts in thrombocytopenic pregnant patients Measurement uncertainty of ISO 17511:2020 compliant and globally standardized PT/INR test results Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived platelets kill multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via Toll-like receptor 2-MyD88 signaling and immunoglobulin G/FcγRIIA engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1