Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102657
Ning Tang, Yuanmei Luo, Mangui Li, Mingchao Zhu, Dengju Li
{"title":"Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value.","authors":"Ning Tang, Yuanmei Luo, Mangui Li, Mingchao Zhu, Dengju Li","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend application of the 99th percentile to determine the cut-off value on at least 120 healthy donors regardless of sex for lupus anticoagulant (LA) ratio of each step. However, a statistically significant difference between the sexes has been found for LA ratio recently.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To clarify whether this sex difference in dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) exists in various detection systems and the necessity of setting sex-specific cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from healthy donors were detected on 3 DRVVT detection systems, and the sex-specific cut-offs of DRVVT test were obtained based on the 99th or 97.5th centile of screen, confirm, and normalized ratios (NRs) grouped by sex in each system. One thousand one hundred twenty one female patients with suspected antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were retrospectively investigated, the APS-associated clinical and laboratory characteristics of female patients stratified by different cut-offs of DRVVT ratio were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DRVVT NRs of females were significantly lower than those of males on each system. The female patients with DRVVT NR between female-specific and regardless of sex cut-offs had higher positive rates of silica clotting time test and LA retest results after 12 weeks than those with DRVVT NRs lower than female-specific cut-off, there were also more patients who met the APS clinical criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sex difference of the cut-off value for DRVVT LA test is confirmed on multiple systems, the female-specific cut-off is lower than regardless of sex cut-off and may lead to more female patients being considered as high-risk population for APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 1","pages":"102657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend application of the 99th percentile to determine the cut-off value on at least 120 healthy donors regardless of sex for lupus anticoagulant (LA) ratio of each step. However, a statistically significant difference between the sexes has been found for LA ratio recently.

Objectives: To clarify whether this sex difference in dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) exists in various detection systems and the necessity of setting sex-specific cut-off values.

Methods: Blood samples from healthy donors were detected on 3 DRVVT detection systems, and the sex-specific cut-offs of DRVVT test were obtained based on the 99th or 97.5th centile of screen, confirm, and normalized ratios (NRs) grouped by sex in each system. One thousand one hundred twenty one female patients with suspected antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were retrospectively investigated, the APS-associated clinical and laboratory characteristics of female patients stratified by different cut-offs of DRVVT ratio were compared.

Results: The DRVVT NRs of females were significantly lower than those of males on each system. The female patients with DRVVT NR between female-specific and regardless of sex cut-offs had higher positive rates of silica clotting time test and LA retest results after 12 weeks than those with DRVVT NRs lower than female-specific cut-off, there were also more patients who met the APS clinical criteria.

Conclusion: The sex difference of the cut-off value for DRVVT LA test is confirmed on multiple systems, the female-specific cut-off is lower than regardless of sex cut-off and may lead to more female patients being considered as high-risk population for APS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别特异性切断稀释罗素毒蛇毒液时间狼疮抗凝试验可能是有价值的。
背景:目前的指南建议应用第99百分位来确定至少120名健康供者的每一步狼疮抗凝血(LA)比率的临界值,无论性别。然而,最近在性别之间发现了LA比率的显著差异。目的:阐明各种检测系统中稀罗素毒蛇毒液时间(DRVVT)是否存在这种性别差异,以及设置性别特异性临界值的必要性。方法:在3套DRVVT检测系统上检测健康献血者的血液样本,并根据每个系统按性别分组的筛选、确认和归一化比率(NRs)的第99或975百分位获得DRVVT检测的性别特异性截止值。对1121例疑似抗磷脂综合征(APS)女性患者进行回顾性调查,比较按不同DRVVT比截点分层的女性患者与APS相关的临床和实验室特征。结果:女性在各系统上的DRVVT NRs均显著低于男性。女性DRVVT NR介于女性特异性和不分性别临界值之间的患者在12周后硅胶凝血时间试验和LA重测结果的阳性率高于DRVVT NR低于女性特异性临界值的患者,符合APS临床标准的患者也更多。结论:DRVVT LA检测的截止值在多个系统上存在性别差异,女性特异性截止值低于不考虑性别的截止值,可能导致更多女性患者被认为是APS的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
No correlation between thrombin generation and emicizumab levels: implications for monitoring emicizumab therapy. Characterization of bleeding in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the precaplacizumab era: a retrospective nationwide analysis. Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value. Health literacy in pediatric thrombosis: a landscape analysis. Time trends of catheter-directed treatment in acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1